Top Speed(er)
#76
Re: (Nvious R)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nvious R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The car was pretty stable with the USDM front end but it felt more stable with the Jap Spec on there. </TD></TR></TABLE>
That's interesting because I've heard that the USDM fronts are more aerodynamic than the JDM fronts, but I haven't seen any proof to back this up.
That's interesting because I've heard that the USDM fronts are more aerodynamic than the JDM fronts, but I haven't seen any proof to back this up.
#77
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Top Speed(er) (RedR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RedR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Pretend R were u running stock pads on that video? it look like u had some brake fade and thats typical with the stock pads </TD></TR></TABLE>
I would guess it is the stock pads,the video was taken 1 year before i got it,by the guy who imported it to norway...
[QOUTE=ITR5874]What`s up dude ? No more power upon 240km/h ?[/QUOTE]
As i said,it was before i got it,maybe the guy driving didn't floor it propably? But since i live in norway and almost never reach speeds above 200km/h i don't realy care if the power drops above 240 in 5. gear... But there was real heavy and fugly rims on the car,maybe that has something to do with it?
I would guess it is the stock pads,the video was taken 1 year before i got it,by the guy who imported it to norway...
[QOUTE=ITR5874]What`s up dude ? No more power upon 240km/h ?[/QUOTE]
As i said,it was before i got it,maybe the guy driving didn't floor it propably? But since i live in norway and almost never reach speeds above 200km/h i don't realy care if the power drops above 240 in 5. gear... But there was real heavy and fugly rims on the car,maybe that has something to do with it?
#78
Re: Top Speed(er) (genuine)
now that's a long time at redline....lol
top speed is useless, but the fastest ive ever taken my ITR to was 145
i still had about 1k to go unto cut, i was at 7500
i have an AEM CAI and just some springs and shocks
top speed is useless, but the fastest ive ever taken my ITR to was 145
i still had about 1k to go unto cut, i was at 7500
i have an AEM CAI and just some springs and shocks
#79
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: CSB, CA, USA
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Top Speed(er) (liquidscor00)
Actually now days people drive like 80+ on the freeways now. I stumbled across this last year when I lost my 94 RS, I had to drive a 86 Voyager. (let me tell you that had to be the worst time of my life, going from a fixed up Integra to a voyager with a cd player) Well, People were pasting me left and right, and i was drive the car to its limits 75 maybe 78 mph. but, those videos were outrageous, I never new the car could do that much speed. Now that I think about it, that would be scary, Especially on US (S.CAL) hwys. Too many dumbass drivers, but to you guys with the top speeds, and Be Cafeful. Maybe when i go to the track i can feel the rush of going speed of 150 mph.
#82
Re: (SoCal ITR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SoCal ITR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">That's interesting because I've heard that the USDM fronts are more aerodynamic than the JDM fronts, but I haven't seen any proof to back this up.</TD></TR></TABLE>
It's true, and documented on here and elsewhere. CoD is better for the US front.
It's true, and documented on here and elsewhere. CoD is better for the US front.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hangoncaroline
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
44
11-05-2004 09:39 PM