Acura Integra All Integra Except ITR

4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2007 | 08:06 PM
  #1  
beastman@'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: BOSSton, MA, usa
Default 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers

AEM's website: "DC Sports 4-2-1 one-piece header systems deliver incredible low- to mid-range power gains,"

I know that's probably just advertising BS, but is there any validity behind it? If anything is lacking in my GSR I feel that it's low end power (especially in 1st gear). Would a 4-2-1 be a good choice as opposed to a 4-1 header?
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2007 | 08:09 PM
  #2  
94VTEC2TONE's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 1
Default Re: 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers (beastman@)

the 4-2-1 supposidly helps it but find a graph to prove it. im on a dc 4-1 header and would love to sell it actually. gsrs make more power up top anyway doubt ull feel what 1-2whp or something diff mid range but alotta people use the 4-1, im happy with it so id say go that way and research whos got the best 4-1
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 12:47 AM
  #3  
dc2Li's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Default Re: 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers (94VTEC2TONE)

4-1 headers are the way to go. Im going that way when i get the money
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 03:42 AM
  #4  
Dogginator's Avatar
Daisy... Daisy...
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,580
Likes: 4
From: 24601
Default Re: 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers (beastman@)

I will always enphasize this point, 4-1 headers greatly reduce ground clearance. They can easily be damaged on the street, especially on a lowered vehicle.

The ITR FAQ has some input.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread/766629
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 07:43 AM
  #5  
Type_RS_59's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Default Re: 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers (Dogginator)

4-1 headers increase the top end peak power more.

4-2-1 headers increase the low to mid range power more.

You need to ask yourself how you use your car and wether you spend more time above 6,000 RPM or more time between 2,000 and 6,000 RPM.

If it is a street car and you are looking for better response at lower RPM, definately go with a 4-2-1.

If it is a race car and peak HP at high RPM is important to you, go with the 4-1.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 07:50 AM
  #6  
Exeed's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 417
Likes: 1
Default Re: 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers (Type_RS_59)

http://tprmag.com/issue/10/10_b16_headers.shtml

Albeit those were taken on a B16, the gains should be quite similar to a B18. Good luck, hope you find what you were looking for
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 08:35 AM
  #7  
cloudsreason's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Default

nice link, a good read in between boring accounting classes...*sigh*
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #8  
Padawan's Avatar
Darth ModerVader
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,539
Likes: 1
From: Mustafar
Default Re: 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers (beastman@)

You honestly can't decide on a header, can you?

If you don't need to worry about being C.A.R.B compliant, I'd pass on the DC 4-2-1.

What you need to do is set a budget for the header, and then select the best one that fits within that budget. I'll gladly provide suggestions, but I can tell you in advance that the DC 4-2-1 won't be one of them.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 12:26 PM
  #9  
SleeperGSR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 1
From: Binghamton, NY, US
Default Re: 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers (Padawan)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Padawan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You honestly can't decide on a header, can you?

If you don't need to worry about being C.A.R.B compliant, I'd pass on the DC 4-2-1.

What you need to do is set a budget for the header, and then select the best one that fits within that budget. I'll gladly provide suggestions, but I can tell you in advance that the DC 4-2-1 won't be one of them. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Why not, after reading that article i thought it looked like it made good gains. Is it because it so expensive. I just bought a megan header 4-1 and im thinking i should have gotten a 4-2-1. Car is a daily driver for now, and i'm a little worried about ground clearance. I searched alot on here before i got it though and it seemed like was the best, especially cuz that's what the type-r has. Now i'm thinking that unless it's a race car, 4-2-1 is better cuz you will wind up with more torque. I guess that is also depending on other mods to the car tho also, so who knows...lol
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 12:50 PM
  #10  
Padawan's Avatar
Darth ModerVader
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,539
Likes: 1
From: Mustafar
Default Re: 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers (SleeperGSR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SleeperGSR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why not, after reading that article i thought it looked like it made good gains. Is it because it so expensive.</TD></TR></TABLE>

No, it's because there are better performing options for around the same price, or perhaps a bit more. I'd rather spend more money on a good header the first time around, rather than spend even more by deciding that I want a better header after first purchasing something like the DC 4-2-1.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SleeperGSR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Now i'm thinking that unless it's a race car, 4-2-1 is better cuz you will wind up with more torque. I guess that is also depending on other mods to the car tho also, so who knows...lol</TD></TR></TABLE>

Much depends upon the quality and design of the header, not just the tubing configuration. Your Megan 4-1 should be a decent performer (assuming it has the 2.5" collector), though ground clearance will obviously be less than with a 4-2-1.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 01:09 PM
  #11  
401tuner's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
From: somewhere in, RI, US
Default Re: 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers (Padawan)

jdm itr 4-1 header. I own one personally and i love it.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 01:24 PM
  #12  
SleeperGSR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 1
From: Binghamton, NY, US
Default Re: 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers (Padawan)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Padawan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Much depends upon the quality and design of the header, not just the tubing configuration. Your Megan 4-1 should be a decent performer (assuming it has the 2.5" collector), though ground clearance will obviously be less than with a 4-2-1. </TD></TR></TABLE>

it does have a 2.5 collector. But looking at the dyno graphs, it seems like i would be gaining more torque with a 4-2-1.? does that sound right? I'm would rather more midrange power than peak hp. I should probably put my car on a dyno to get a baseline.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 02:05 PM
  #13  
B18 Piston's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,881
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
Default Re: 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers (Type_RS_59)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Type_RS_59 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If it is a street car and you are looking for better response at lower RPM, definately go with a 4-2-1.

If it is a race car and peak HP at high RPM is important to you, go with the 4-1.</TD></TR></TABLE>

agree
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 06:12 PM
  #14  
beastman@'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: BOSSton, MA, usa
Default Re: 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers (TYPERRER)

Thanks for adding all your input everyone, I really can't decide.

Tonight I was talking to my buddy who works at a brake/muffler/etc shop, he went to UTI and definitely knows his stuff. He said that in reality, no matter how much flow your header allows, the engine is still sending the same amount of exhaust through it. So at a certain point, there is no longer a need for more flow. He said he would be suprised if I notice the difference between a DC 4-2-1, and any 4-1, or tri-Y header.

Obvioulsy if you are going to upgrade your bottom end, this would be a different story, but I'm not planning on doing that anytime soon. So I'm still undecided.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 06:18 PM
  #15  
Padawan's Avatar
Darth ModerVader
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,539
Likes: 1
From: Mustafar
Default Re: 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers (beastman@)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by beastman@ &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">He said he would be suprised if I notice the difference between a DC 4-2-1, and any 4-1, or tri-Y header.</TD></TR></TABLE>

He may be knowledgeable, but he's incorrect in telling you that there will not be a performance difference between a bolt-on DC 4-2-1, and a quality long-tube "tri-Y" header.

I think in this situation and the price range you appear to be shopping in, I'd select the replica Tri-Y being sold in the Sponsors Marketplace.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 12:02 AM
  #16  
dc2Li's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Default Re: 4-2-1 vs. 4-1 headers (Type_RS_59)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Type_RS_59 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">4-1 headers increase the top end peak power more.

4-2-1 headers increase the low to mid range power more.

You need to ask yourself how you use your car and wether you spend more time above 6,000 RPM or more time between 2,000 and 6,000 RPM.

If it is a street car and you are looking for better response at lower RPM, definately go with a 4-2-1.

If it is a race car and peak HP at high RPM is important to you, go with the 4-1.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dc4teg95
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
3
Jun 22, 2007 02:12 PM
Steezn4NOReason
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
8
Dec 25, 2004 07:39 PM
Fidelio25
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
4
Jul 27, 2004 10:15 AM
RussHondaCRXVtec
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
21
Sep 25, 2003 10:25 AM
jt-sport
Tech / Misc
12
Aug 26, 2003 03:57 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:35 PM.