205/40/16 vs 205/45/16 -- Why?
#1
HT White Ops
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: I see what you did there.
Posts: 16,222
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
205/40/16 vs 205/45/16 -- Why?
Pretty simple question with a not-so-simple answer:
Why is it that a 205/40/16 tire is safe (according to the manufacturer) on an 8" wide wheel -- but a 205/45/16 is not? Why is an 82mm sidewall ok to stretch, but a 93mm sidewall is beyond the scope of safety?
Is there any science to this? Or am I just going to receive the answer of "You need to follow the manufacturer's safety recommendation"?
Why is it that a 205/40/16 tire is safe (according to the manufacturer) on an 8" wide wheel -- but a 205/45/16 is not? Why is an 82mm sidewall ok to stretch, but a 93mm sidewall is beyond the scope of safety?
Is there any science to this? Or am I just going to receive the answer of "You need to follow the manufacturer's safety recommendation"?
#3
Sanji
iTrader: (1)
Re: 205/40/16 vs 205/45/16 -- Why?
I do not know the exact reasoning myself, to be honest. It has cropped up in my research, as well. I would assume that it has something to do with the construction of the tire, and how the sidewall height has a certain amount of elasticity that can either make or break the tire's durability.
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 205/40/16 vs 205/45/16 -- Why?
It doesn't make sense, at first look at least.
From what I know 7.5" is the max. wheel width for 205 tire.
Maybe the manufacturer's concern is more with incorrect speedometer reading than stretching.
When sidewall thickness is the same the bigger sidewall will be more flexible,
which means that will stretch easily, I don't know how much this will affect the cornering stability of the tire, though.
From what I know 7.5" is the max. wheel width for 205 tire.
Maybe the manufacturer's concern is more with incorrect speedometer reading than stretching.
When sidewall thickness is the same the bigger sidewall will be more flexible,
which means that will stretch easily, I don't know how much this will affect the cornering stability of the tire, though.
#7
HT White Ops
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: I see what you did there.
Posts: 16,222
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: 205/40/16 vs 205/45/16 -- Why?
The wheel and tire setup I'm proposing (size for size) is not unheard of either. I know this forum does not advise or condone anything beyond the manufacturer's setting -- but I think this is a grey area.
Not stretched -- but not recommended.
Not stretched -- but not recommended.
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA, United States
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: 205/40/16 vs 205/45/16 -- Why?
The first number in the size of a tire is the section width, not the tread width. The section width is the widest part of the sidewall.
Given the same section width, the tire with the larger aspect ratio will generally have more curve to the sidewall, reducing the width of the wheel mounting area. The smaller aspect ratio tire will generally be "more square", allowing wider wheels to be used.
Then there's also the intended use portion of the design. Lower profile tires are generally reserved for more performance oriented use, and thus tend to be designed for wider wheels.
#9
HT White Ops
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: I see what you did there.
Posts: 16,222
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: 205/40/16 vs 205/45/16 -- Why?
I bolded the incorrect portion.
The first number in the size of a tire is the section width, not the tread width. The section width is the widest part of the sidewall.
Given the same section width, the tire with the larger aspect ratio will generally have more curve to the sidewall, reducing the width of the wheel mounting area. The smaller aspect ratio tire will generally be "more square", allowing wider wheels to be used.
Then there's also the intended use portion of the design. Lower profile tires are generally reserved for more performance oriented use, and thus tend to be designed for wider wheels.
The first number in the size of a tire is the section width, not the tread width. The section width is the widest part of the sidewall.
Given the same section width, the tire with the larger aspect ratio will generally have more curve to the sidewall, reducing the width of the wheel mounting area. The smaller aspect ratio tire will generally be "more square", allowing wider wheels to be used.
Then there's also the intended use portion of the design. Lower profile tires are generally reserved for more performance oriented use, and thus tend to be designed for wider wheels.
Seems odd though to have section width as a static number ... wouldn't the section width change depending on the width of the wheel it's mounted on? I understand that the measurement is originally taken without load, but it changes dramatically once mounted. A tread width, on the other hand, should stay relatively constant unless you're doing some ungodly stretch.
Not saying this is wrong -- just that I am now perplexed by something that used to be a pretty cut and dry bit of info before.
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 205/40/16 vs 205/45/16 -- Why?
Seems odd though to have section width as a static number ... wouldn't the section width change depending on the width of the wheel it's mounted on? I understand that the measurement is originally taken without load, but it changes dramatically once mounted. A tread width, on the other hand, should stay relatively constant unless you're doing some ungodly stretch.
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA, United States
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: 205/40/16 vs 205/45/16 -- Why?
My mistake then.
Seems odd though to have section width as a static number ... wouldn't the section width change depending on the width of the wheel it's mounted on? I understand that the measurement is originally taken without load, but it changes dramatically once mounted. A tread width, on the other hand, should stay relatively constant unless you're doing some ungodly stretch.
Not saying this is wrong -- just that I am now perplexed by something that used to be a pretty cut and dry bit of info before.
Seems odd though to have section width as a static number ... wouldn't the section width change depending on the width of the wheel it's mounted on? I understand that the measurement is originally taken without load, but it changes dramatically once mounted. A tread width, on the other hand, should stay relatively constant unless you're doing some ungodly stretch.
Not saying this is wrong -- just that I am now perplexed by something that used to be a pretty cut and dry bit of info before.
Section width in millimeters / aspect ratio / wheel diameter in inches
mm / % of mm / in
Yeah, that completely makes sense to me...
Once upon a time, there was no aspect ratio. All tires used to come with an aspect ratio of 82 (such an absurd choice imo).
And that's not even getting into the reality of just how inaccurate the posted section widths of tires are. I currently have a set of 205/45-16s on my Integra that measure wider (tread and section widths) than the set of 225/45-17s on my wife's car...
#12
Re: 205/40/16 vs 205/45/16 -- Why?
I ran this past our resident Tire Guru, and he felt the shorter sidewall provides greater lateral stability (in terms of the tire’s ability to stay properly seated when it encounters a side force) that could push the bead of the tire off the bead seat of the wheel (very bad when it happens). The taller sidewall can mechanically move (hinge) further under the side force, raising the risk of coming unseated if mounted on a wide(er) base width.
in other words, sometimes the shorter sidewall fits a wide wheel better than the taller sidewall .....
who knew ?
in other words, sometimes the shorter sidewall fits a wide wheel better than the taller sidewall .....
who knew ?
#13
HT White Ops
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: I see what you did there.
Posts: 16,222
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: 205/40/16 vs 205/45/16 -- Why?
I ran this past our resident Tire Guru, and he felt the shorter sidewall provides greater lateral stability (in terms of the tire’s ability to stay properly seated when it encounters a side force) that could push the bead of the tire off the bead seat of the wheel (very bad when it happens). The taller sidewall can mechanically move (hinge) further under the side force, raising the risk of coming unseated if mounted on a wide(er) base width.
in other words, sometimes the shorter sidewall fits a wide wheel better than the taller sidewall .....
who knew ?
in other words, sometimes the shorter sidewall fits a wide wheel better than the taller sidewall .....
who knew ?
#14
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CLICC916
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
7
02-13-2002 01:38 PM