STROKER KIT
B*a*n*n*e*d
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,783
Likes: 47
From: Greenville, South Carolina
Re: (Enzo Speed)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Enzo Speed »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I hear people who say they've done it, but according to wikipedia.org, D17 cranks will not fit in D16's for one main reason:
So I'm kind of confused on that.
Modified by Enzo Speed at 3:29 AM 9/6/2006</TD></TR></TABLE>
wikipedia is wrong.
d15 have smaller mains (45mm i think)
d16/d16 have larger mains (48mm i think)
So I'm kind of confused on that.
Modified by Enzo Speed at 3:29 AM 9/6/2006</TD></TR></TABLE>
wikipedia is wrong.
d15 have smaller mains (45mm i think)
d16/d16 have larger mains (48mm i think)
B*a*n*n*e*d
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,783
Likes: 47
From: Greenville, South Carolina
Re: (Enzo Speed)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Enzo Speed »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Aside from my other ramblings, here's another good reason why you should NOT stroke your D16: side-loading.
Ever wonder why D16's are always blowing headgaskets? It's because they have problems with sleeve movement (again, R/S is too low). Now go ahead and stroke that motor and increase the side-loading; sleeve distortion is only going to worsen.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I didn't know that that was why they were blowing headgaskets. I wonder if the d15b 1.62 r/s ratio is good enough
Ever wonder why D16's are always blowing headgaskets? It's because they have problems with sleeve movement (again, R/S is too low). Now go ahead and stroke that motor and increase the side-loading; sleeve distortion is only going to worsen.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I didn't know that that was why they were blowing headgaskets. I wonder if the d15b 1.62 r/s ratio is good enough
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Simi Valley, CA, USA
Re: (Bense)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bense »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
wikipedia is wrong.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I came to the same conclusion
They still have some good information though. I didn't see any other mistakes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_D_engine
wikipedia is wrong.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I came to the same conclusion
They still have some good information though. I didn't see any other mistakes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_D_engine
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Simi Valley, CA, USA
Re: (Bense)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bense »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> I wonder if the d15b 1.62 r/s ratio is good enough </TD></TR></TABLE>
It's certainly better than 1.52. "Theoretically" the ideal R/S is 1.75, but it's seldom seen because a slightly higher or slightly lower R/S will have pros/cons. It's really a toss up.
Personally, I think 1.75 is too high. I'd like to have about a 1.65.
It's certainly better than 1.52. "Theoretically" the ideal R/S is 1.75, but it's seldom seen because a slightly higher or slightly lower R/S will have pros/cons. It's really a toss up.
Personally, I think 1.75 is too high. I'd like to have about a 1.65.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,411
Likes: 0
From: nowere, usa
Re: (Enzo Speed)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Enzo Speed »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
It's certainly better than 1.52. "Theoretically" the ideal R/S is 1.75, but it's seldom seen because a slightly higher or slightly lower R/S will have pros/cons. It's really a toss up.
Personally, I think 1.75 is too high. I'd like to have about a 1.65.</TD></TR></TABLE>
when breaking down the physics of a engine (R:S) the otto engine is so flawed. It works but... I hate thinking about because it just seems so wrong!
It's certainly better than 1.52. "Theoretically" the ideal R/S is 1.75, but it's seldom seen because a slightly higher or slightly lower R/S will have pros/cons. It's really a toss up.
Personally, I think 1.75 is too high. I'd like to have about a 1.65.</TD></TR></TABLE>
when breaking down the physics of a engine (R:S) the otto engine is so flawed. It works but... I hate thinking about because it just seems so wrong!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
speed1
Forced Induction
10
Aug 31, 2012 11:49 AM
