OCTANE boost comparo
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ, United States
out of everything i had seen here
has anyone ever done a true comparison on the octane boosters out there
ie- which actually bumps octane ratings as advertised
which does its job better
is the NOS race version with nitromethane worth it
stuff like that
Im not a chemist but its something that piqued my interest
has anyone ever done a true comparison on the octane boosters out there
ie- which actually bumps octane ratings as advertised
which does its job better
is the NOS race version with nitromethane worth it
stuff like that
Im not a chemist but its something that piqued my interest
I don't know what anyone else thinks but personally I don't like octane boosters. I've seen that they usually leave deposits and generally aren't going to boost the octane much anyways...
My suggestion is, add toluene
My suggestion is, add toluene
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ, United States
well the reason I ask is my motor barely runs on 94 pump gas
12.5 compression maybe slightly higher
it likes 100
hence the octane booster question
12.5 compression maybe slightly higher
it likes 100
hence the octane booster question
Try toluene
Search the net for mixing tables...I'll see if I can dig up a link for you
If you've got a nice built motor the last thing I'd put in it is crap octane booster
Here ya go man....for my fellow NJ'r
http://www.elektro.com/~audi/audi/toluene.html
[Modified by Prod, 7:24 PM 10/29/2002]
[Modified by Prod, 7:25 PM 10/29/2002]
Search the net for mixing tables...I'll see if I can dig up a link for you
If you've got a nice built motor the last thing I'd put in it is crap octane booster
Here ya go man....for my fellow NJ'r
http://www.elektro.com/~audi/audi/toluene.html
[Modified by Prod, 7:24 PM 10/29/2002]
[Modified by Prod, 7:25 PM 10/29/2002]
Trending Topics
Reffering to my good old maximum boost book for a technical definition...it's a distillate of oil and a cousin of gasoline, it's a hydrocarbon. Toluene is also known as methyl-benzene.
The closest test to me was my friends supercharged civic, that car could definetly make power with it. He always ran different octane boosters and said that the red stp octane booster was the best one. It also happened to be the cheapest.
Ditto, toluene (or another suitable aromatic) is the only really downside free octane booster. If you look on any of the octane booster cans you are comparing, choose the one who's main ingredient is toluene. If none of them contain it, forget about it and just retard your timing until it's not hellish hot wherever you are.
EDIT: Just noticed, you're in HELL, NJ. MOVE.
[Modified by texan, 1:34 AM 10/30/2002]
EDIT: Just noticed, you're in HELL, NJ. MOVE.
[Modified by texan, 1:34 AM 10/30/2002]
no actually just put it in and go, it's just going to raise the octane and speed the burn rate tremedously
[Modified by Prod, 6:56 PM 10/30/2002]
[Modified by Prod, 6:56 PM 10/30/2002]
Austin
Actually higher octane slows down the combustion process and gives you a more controlled burn, and less prone to detonation, allowing you to run a more advanced timing curve.
Austin
Austin
Octane rating and burn rate are two different properties of a fuel, one doesn't necessarily affect the other. Many racing fuels are both very high octane and very fast burn rate, specifically tailored for high RPM duties.
Octane Myth #1 - Higher octane fuel is "more powerful" and "burns hotter"
The difference in total energy between high octane and regular gas is insignificant. In fact, race gas often has slightly less energy by weight than pump gas! High octane fuels are generally harder to ignite, and burn more slowly than ones with low octane. In some cases, an engine optimized to run on 87 octane gas will produce less power when fed racing gasoline due to the slower ignition and combustion characteristics of the high octane fuel.
The difference in total energy between high octane and regular gas is insignificant. In fact, race gas often has slightly less energy by weight than pump gas! High octane fuels are generally harder to ignite, and burn more slowly than ones with low octane. In some cases, an engine optimized to run on 87 octane gas will produce less power when fed racing gasoline due to the slower ignition and combustion characteristics of the high octane fuel.
ctane
In internal combustion engines, the compressed gasoline-air mixtures have a tendency to ignite prematurely rather than burning smoothly. This creates engine knock, a characteristic rattling or pinging sound in one or more cylinders. The octane number of gasoline is a measure of its resistance to knock.
http://chemistry.about.com/gi/dynami.../gasoline.html
I still believe my information to be correct...but if I'm wrong please tell me....
Thank you,
Austin
Hey Austin
I'm always one for new information but I beleive the links you've posted are related to gasoline...toluene has it's own unique properties which it brings into the combustion process and everythign I've read about it says it speeds up burns rate alot. This is one of the few reasons it was so popular on those small displacement insane turbo motors back in the turbo Formula One Days.
I'm always one for new information but I beleive the links you've posted are related to gasoline...toluene has it's own unique properties which it brings into the combustion process and everythign I've read about it says it speeds up burns rate alot. This is one of the few reasons it was so popular on those small displacement insane turbo motors back in the turbo Formula One Days.
I think your both correct just locked up in your terminology and what specifically your talking about.
*Toluene is denser than ordinary gasoline (0.87 g/mL vs. 0.72-0.74) and contains more energy per unit volume. Thus combustion of toluene leads to more energy being liberated and thus more power generated.
Taken from http://www.elektro.com/~audi/audi/toluene.html
Austin is correct about Octane and pre-ignition, while Prod is correct about Toluene and the energy released.
*Toluene is denser than ordinary gasoline (0.87 g/mL vs. 0.72-0.74) and contains more energy per unit volume. Thus combustion of toluene leads to more energy being liberated and thus more power generated.
Taken from http://www.elektro.com/~audi/audi/toluene.html
Austin is correct about Octane and pre-ignition, while Prod is correct about Toluene and the energy released.
Austin- The FAQ gasoline link is the best resource you'll find online concerning the physics of fuel. And I qoute...
The antiknock ability is related to the "autoignition temperature" of the hydrocarbons. Antiknock ability is _not_ substantially related to:-
1. The energy content of fuel, this should be obvious, as oxygenates have lower energy contents, but high octanes.
2. The flame speed of the conventionally ignited mixture, this should be evident from the similarities of the two reference hydrocarbons. Although flame speed does play a minor part, there are many other factors that are far more important. ( such as compression ratio, stoichiometry, combustion chamber shape, chemical structure of the fuel, presence of antiknock additives, number and position of spark plugs, turbulence etc.) Flame speed does not correlate with octane.
That's what I was speaking of. Burn rate and octane rating are two different properties of fuel, and gasoline now being the witch's brew it is, you can't infer anything about one property from the other these days. Once upon a time there weren't 20 different compounds in pump gas, and then you could make a few more generalizations concerning it's properties.
Ps- If you're really concerned about energy content per gallon, just get a diesel engine.
Pps- While oxygenated gasolines do carry less energy per gallon, you can usually make more power with them once you richen up the mixture a bit. The hardest thing with an engine is getting 02 into the chamber, and it's always nice when the fuel takes a good bit along with it. Nitromethane is a good example: it takes a TON of nitro in the chamber to burn, but the power output from this fuel and it's large oxygen content makes incredible power.
[Modified by texan, 5:40 PM 10/30/2002]
The antiknock ability is related to the "autoignition temperature" of the hydrocarbons. Antiknock ability is _not_ substantially related to:-
1. The energy content of fuel, this should be obvious, as oxygenates have lower energy contents, but high octanes.
2. The flame speed of the conventionally ignited mixture, this should be evident from the similarities of the two reference hydrocarbons. Although flame speed does play a minor part, there are many other factors that are far more important. ( such as compression ratio, stoichiometry, combustion chamber shape, chemical structure of the fuel, presence of antiknock additives, number and position of spark plugs, turbulence etc.) Flame speed does not correlate with octane.
That's what I was speaking of. Burn rate and octane rating are two different properties of fuel, and gasoline now being the witch's brew it is, you can't infer anything about one property from the other these days. Once upon a time there weren't 20 different compounds in pump gas, and then you could make a few more generalizations concerning it's properties.
Ps- If you're really concerned about energy content per gallon, just get a diesel engine.
Pps- While oxygenated gasolines do carry less energy per gallon, you can usually make more power with them once you richen up the mixture a bit. The hardest thing with an engine is getting 02 into the chamber, and it's always nice when the fuel takes a good bit along with it. Nitromethane is a good example: it takes a TON of nitro in the chamber to burn, but the power output from this fuel and it's large oxygen content makes incredible power.
[Modified by texan, 5:40 PM 10/30/2002]
hey, just wanted to say i remember your name and your crazy good explanations of everything from some other forum, i think automotiveforums.com! Sometimes you lose me, but i know you know your ****! Glad to have your knowledge on HT! Just one thing i'm not sure about, is your explanation about the standing strut bar test!! chow!
people sure are friendly around here
Rybrid- About the strut bar tech, I could make some graphics explaining myself better, but they'd still just illustrate my opinion and not necessarily the truth of it. Bottom line though, if a chassis brace can't withstand my weight applied to it without significant flexing, I hesitate to call it a brace.
Rybrid- About the strut bar tech, I could make some graphics explaining myself better, but they'd still just illustrate my opinion and not necessarily the truth of it. Bottom line though, if a chassis brace can't withstand my weight applied to it without significant flexing, I hesitate to call it a brace.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ, United States
i love all this cos it reaffirms what i learned working with so many race engine builders
there is however this gasoline out there which does help produce a bit more power that a few circle track guys use and one that a consistent winner uses
and its slightly oxygenated
i will find out waht it is called again and repost it
they make a bit more power than their competitors and they are trying to illegalize its use
there is however this gasoline out there which does help produce a bit more power that a few circle track guys use and one that a consistent winner uses
and its slightly oxygenated
i will find out waht it is called again and repost it
they make a bit more power than their competitors and they are trying to illegalize its use


