I dunno if this is the right thread...but how much of a difference is there between a Civic Si and a GSR when it comes to insurance. I've found a nice milano red civic Si, and a GSR, just wanna see if any of you know if a Civic Si is any cheaper to insure than a GSR. thanks

 

GSR will be more, especially since the GSR is the #1 stolen car in America...

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Vap133 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">GSR will be more, especially since the GSR is the #1 stolen car in America...</TD></TR></TABLE>

its the most thefts per 1000 cars, not most stolen car

 

the SI is way cheaper....my friends is a lot cheapre than mine.

 

Late 80's corollas are the most stolen car in america :/

 

Well, i have owned both, and the difference was like $7 a month for me when I switched from a 2000 Si to a 2000 GS-R..... The only reason Liquidgsr pays way more for his Gs-R than his friends' Si is ebcause he probably has a shitty driving record.. Otherwise, the price difference between the two is not really anything..

 

i work for AAA insurance.
the difference is not that much at all.
Comprehensive...which covers theft...is one of the cheapest
parts of your insurance policy. Collision is waaay more and so is liability...
so the fact that integra's are by ratio the most stolen car...it won't matter
much...civics and especially civic si's are stolen alot too..

 

i pay almost the same since i drive a 4 door, and yes i do have a bad driving record. My friend is studing for a insurance license so im just telling u what he has told me. He wanted a gsr but the civic had less insurance so he bought the civic. He said its almost the same as a normal ex. I don't know.