b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 06:24 PM
  #1  
hondaeg5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
From: westchester, ny, usa
Default b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost?

just as topic says. any input appreciated.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 06:51 PM
  #2  
93LSivic's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,608
Likes: 1
From: All around, De/Pa
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (hondaeg5)

Not to be cocky or anything, but does it matter. From the looks of your sig you cant drive anyways.

Sorry man.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 07:14 PM
  #3  
racerxadam's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 0
From: Filthadelphia Area, PA, USA
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (93LSivic)

damn dan thats harsh. sorry i don't know about the trans


[Modified by racerxadam, 11:14 PM 2/12/2003]
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 07:32 PM
  #4  
95c1v1cs1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: US
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (racerxadam)

GSR tranny would be better for boost than the b16 tranny. LS tranny would be even better for boost.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 07:33 PM
  #5  
maxpsi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL, United States
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (racerxadam)

That is harsh. IMO, he is trapping pretty good for that time.

ANYWAYS, to get back on topic, I have a turbo B16 with a GSR tranny. With my stockies, I am right in the sweet spot of fourth gear when I pass the 1/4 mile marker pulling hard. I couldn't imagine what it would be like with short gears of a B16 or longer gears of an LS. The GSR is a very valuable and strong tranny. GSR TRANNY
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 09:02 PM
  #6  
boosted hybrid's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 2
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (maxpsi)

First figure out what your projected trap speed will be, then pick your tire or slick size, then figure out your redline so you can go through the traps without shifting into 5th.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 09:31 PM
  #7  
MotorMatrix.com's Avatar
I am a bad person
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (93LSivic)

Not to be cocky or anything, but does it matter. From the looks of your sig you cant drive anyways.

Sorry man.
dont be dick. your 2.0 60ft is not anything to write home about either. i ran 2.5 60 ft in my car except i ran 12.4 @ 126 mph which means i cant drive either but i still would have beat you. also notice the kid ran a 2.2 60ft in a 15 second car. its harder to get a 2.0-2.1 in a slower car.


[Modified by MotorMatrix.com, 2:13 AM 2/13/2003]
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 09:38 PM
  #8  
b16ahybrid's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
From: W.A
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (95c1v1cs1)

GSR tranny would be better for boost than the b16 tranny. LS tranny would be even better for boost.
Not entirely true.
Shortest gearing always wins when it comes to acceleration.
For a street car the gs-r tranny works perfect. how do I know? because i'm runing one on my b16a.
A buddy of mine has the b16 tranny on his, and I like driving mine more, it feels better, to me at least, both cars pull hard under boost. He has to shift into 5th gear as where I can stay in 4th gear (runing the same size tires) before hitting the traps.
The ls tranny has long gearing, so you top speed is higher but it's slower in acceleration
B16 tranny has shortest gearing
and the gs-r is a perfect medium....
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2003 | 03:19 AM
  #9  
hondaeg5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
From: westchester, ny, usa
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (b16ahybrid)

ok just to clear that time up. thats my only run ever! but thanks for all the info.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2003 | 04:44 AM
  #10  
SiRkid's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,391
Likes: 0
From: Canada City
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (hondaeg5)

ive run faster in my 2800+ lbs Si with i/e, on stock rubber ,but thats not the point of this thread.

b16 would be the best...but as someone said, figure out your traps and go from there..if your looking for something that wont rev to high while cruising on the highway(Even though i reallly dont think the b16 tranny revs that high while cruising) then go with the gsr. stay away from the ls.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2003 | 06:10 AM
  #11  
Smashback's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, TX
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (95c1v1cs1)

GSR tranny would be better for boost than the b16 tranny. LS tranny would be even better for boost.
Is that supposed to be a joke? You'd still be in 2nd trying to hit VTEC and make full boost with an LS tranny.

Here we go again though, haven't we argued this enough?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2003 | 06:50 AM
  #12  
Dancing is Forbidden's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,737
Likes: 0
From: Chucktown, SC
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (Hatchblack)

...BUT isn't the LS tranny the best option for running boost (high boost) on an LS engine?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2003 | 07:14 AM
  #13  
StageIIIhb98's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: All over, MD., US.
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (EF9_SiR)

Give me an ls with lsd anyday the b16 works good the gsr is better but to have top end gears and a nice long 3rd to get you through the quarter is perfect.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2003 | 09:04 AM
  #14  
ITR981002's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (hondaeg5)

ok just to clear that time up. thats my only run ever! but thanks for all the info.
Don't worry about these ********, Drag racing a FWD car takes lots of practice. Just keep at it
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2003 | 09:15 AM
  #15  
Smashback's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, TX
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (EF9_SiR)

NO.

But I give up. I'm going to quit talking about trannys altogether. This LS LETS YOU STAY IN BOOST LONGER idiocy is spreading like a disease.

I don't understand why people ask questions and then get pissed when they don't get the answer they think is right, or don't hear what they want to.

I guess if you want less tire spin (and a slower 1/4 time) use the LS tranny. If anybody has GSR or B16 trannys, I will start buying up LS trannys for straight trades.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2003 | 09:20 AM
  #16  
b16ahybrid's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
From: W.A
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (EF9_SiR)

...BUT isn't the LS tranny the best option for running boost (high boost) on an LS engine?
Sure if it's on an ls but were talking about a b16a. Still though shorter gearing = faster acceleration
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2003 | 09:29 AM
  #17  
MotorMatrix.com's Avatar
I am a bad person
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (StageIIIhb98)

Give me an ls with lsd anyday the b16 works good the gsr is better but to have top end gears and a nice long 3rd to get you through the quarter is perfect.
this topic has been worn out. a high boost car has lag and therfore will not work well with a long geared ls tranny. the quicker you get thru the gears the quicker you finish.I guess you have never driven a boost car with a big turbo that diest make full boost until past 6k.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2003 | 09:36 AM
  #18  
avividmemory's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,209
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere, IN
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (Hatchblack)

I guess if you want less tire spin (and a slower 1/4 time) use the LS tranny. If anybody has GSR or B16 trannys, I will start buying up LS trannys for straight trades.
heh, anybody want to trade for my LS tranny?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2003 | 01:33 PM
  #19  
93LSivic's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,608
Likes: 1
From: All around, De/Pa
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (MotorMatrix.com)

dont be dick. your 2.0 60ft is not anything to write home about either. i ran 2.5 60 ft in my car except i ran 12.4 @ 126 mph which means i cant drive either but i still would have beat you. also notice the kid ran a 2.2 60ft in a 15 second car. its harder to get a 2.0-2.1 in a slower car.
Sorry, guess I should have added to that.
I ran the same setup in my Si (2500+ lbs) and my best was 14.6 @ 93.
But I see that was his only run. Maybe I was a bit harsh--sorry. Keep practicing, with that car and setup w/ a low 60 you should hit 14.3-4's.

Who says its hard to get 2.0 - 2.1 60's in a slower car? Ive ran them since I had my single cam with only i/e.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2003 | 09:22 PM
  #20  
MotorMatrix.com's Avatar
I am a bad person
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (93LSivic)

Who says its hard to get 2.0 - 2.1 60's in a slower car? Ive ran them since I had my single cam with only i/e.
I never said it was hard. i said it was "harder" then a car with a little more tq. I get lower 60's "easier" in my 1.8 jetta then in an all motor hatchback.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2003 | 09:49 PM
  #21  
CRX-RX's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
From: Crystal Lake, IL, USA
Default Re: b16 w/gsr trans,better for boost? (Hatchblack)

I'm going to quit talking about trannys altogether. This LS LETS YOU STAY IN BOOST LONGER idiocy is spreading like a disease.
Hey, I heard that everyone with a B18 head should throw it out and get a B16 cause it flows better...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tomlinson619
Forced Induction
12
Jun 2, 2006 01:58 PM
ShaDoWbOi
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
4
Jul 15, 2005 04:04 PM
boredracer408
Forced Induction
16
Dec 16, 2004 12:07 PM
bboylito
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
9
Oct 30, 2004 02:34 PM
DD_JonnyLee
Forced Induction
7
Sep 28, 2004 02:47 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:43 PM.