Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

turbo sleeper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2003 | 02:40 PM
  #1  
smooz EK's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: West Coast, CA, USA
Default turbo sleeper

it's a dumb question but... i was thinking about getting turbo on my stock 96 dx hatch and i want it to be a sleeper. is there a way i could lower the sound of the bov? i know the sound is coming from the air being forced out, but is there a way i could do this without the *putsssss* sound being so loud?
thanks.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #2  
emr88's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in, SoCal
Default Re: turbo sleeper (smooz EK)

Post this question in the Forced Induction forum, I think there is a way of routing the BOV air back into the intake, that might reduce the sound of the BOV, not sure though.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2003 | 02:45 PM
  #3  
Happyman's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
Default Re: turbo sleeper (smooz EK)

There are BOVs that don't make much sound. Like from stock Eclipse GS-Ts. You can't even hear it.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2003 | 02:46 PM
  #4  
IM ALL BOB's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,292
Likes: 0
From: SO.CALI
Default Re: turbo sleeper (emr88)

actually you are correct emr.. it's just like a stock OEM turbo setup.. where they re route the air that exits the BOV to a place after the BOV and before the intake manifold ...just like a wastegate closed loop system works.. where you route the wastegate piping to a later part of the exhaust system thus minimizing sound
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2003 | 03:02 PM
  #5  
smooz EK's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: West Coast, CA, USA
Default Re: turbo sleeper (IM ALL BOB)

is this setup difficult to do? and would i get the same performance?
thanks.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2003 | 03:05 PM
  #6  
IM ALL BOB's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,292
Likes: 0
From: SO.CALI
Default Re: turbo sleeper (smooz EK)

hard to say I say ask the forced induction boys.. but usually there is no loss in performance what so ever
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2003 | 03:32 PM
  #7  
CivicSoul's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, fl, usa
Default Re: turbo sleeper (IM ALL BOB)

Well, the dsm bov are loud when you disconect the recycling part. It is possible to recirculate with some bov's but they will need custom welding for a pipe. Queit Sleepers are nice but would you rather have a slow or fast car. Without an intercooler and large exhaust you will be really hurting yourself and their is no way to stop the turbo wine. Besides if your BOV is blazin then you already are racing. Doesn't matter then.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2003 | 04:24 PM
  #8  
slammed_93_hatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,483
Likes: 0
From: cali
Default Re: turbo sleeper (CivicSoul)

thats why you go with a black intercooler or get it painted black and with the exhaust just get a DL muffler don't get like a greddy with a tip that is 5 inchs long and 4 inch's wide
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2003 | 04:38 PM
  #9  
Evs-One's Avatar
Solbros Owns Me
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 14,462
Likes: 6
From: Vancouver, WA, USA
Default Re: turbo sleeper (slammed_93_hatch)

get a filter for the BOV. My friend has a Blitz BOV and you can mount a little silver filter- which quiets it down A LOT, or have the little horn which sound good. I doubt you'd fool anyone because the exhaust with a turbo is way different and you can also hear it spool. The BOV is just an added bonus.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
teg_95
Forced Induction
11
Jun 3, 2010 04:20 PM
draxxus07
Forced Induction
19
May 20, 2005 11:08 AM
ZhaGg
Forced Induction
2
Jul 1, 2004 04:53 PM
ddua
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002)
7
Oct 1, 2003 06:59 AM
smooz EK
Forced Induction
12
Jan 18, 2003 11:09 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:40 AM.