Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 05:47 PM
  #1  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

Going to do a review here on the front upper adjustable control arms made by skunk2.

These are the Pro Series Plus line, or the top of the line model.

Over all at first glance they look to be a solid product with free floating bushings which differentiates them from the other models in the line up.

Before I (to be frank) put them on blast. I have contacted them and notified them of the problems to which their response was "these problems do not warrant warranty claims." I got neither an apology or even a recognition of a problem. YOU DECIDE...

problems:

1. Gap between boot and stud that will allow dirt and water into joint. about 5/32nds of an inch.

2. Extremely weak looking boot with mold realease residue left all over the boot.

3. Barely any grease compared to an brand new OEM joint. I would estimate 1/10 the amount of grease the OEM Honda BJ would have
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 05:49 PM
  #2  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

The Gap.
Attached Images   
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 05:50 PM
  #3  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

Weak boot with mold release residue and hardly enough grease.
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 05:51 PM
  #4  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

The solution, is oem ball joint boot which Skunk2 said would fit differently because its made for oem ball joint and not skunk2 ball joint, but wait Skunk2 your telling me the stud size and taper angle are different? I sure hope not or else this ball joint stud wont be fitting into the knuckle properly at all lol.
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 05:54 PM
  #5  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

Also filled ball joint with oem outboard axle grease which seemed to be a dead nuts match to what was in there.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 05:55 PM
  #6  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

Any one else with a review on these arms feel free...
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 06:18 PM
  #7  
JDM_teh_WIN!!'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 0
From: Paper Street
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

My only concern would be that now that you have filled the boot up with grease and its at the very top of the taper, that when you go to tighten it down andthe taper gets pulled into the knuckle the grease will either squish out or there will be a lot of pressure and the boot will eventually split.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 06:56 PM
  #8  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

no worries , next time you replace a ball joint with a new one you will see how much grease is in there. this is good as it forces grease into the joint, oem boots are made for this.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 07:04 PM
  #9  
JDM_teh_WIN!!'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 0
From: Paper Street
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

Well Im running the same UCA's and I haven't noticed any problems with them yet. I did however reboot some axles with redline lube and I didn't think I over packed them but in less than a week they split open. I doubt you'll have any problems with yours and good for you actually taking it apart and looking at it.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 07:27 PM
  #10  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

Thanks , perks of being a perfectionist.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 08:04 AM
  #11  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

Not a bad product at all beside these minor issues.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 10:12 AM
  #12  
Mashimaro's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

i find their ball joints to be pretty weaksauce.

i've gone through 3 on each side over the past 4 years now. my car not extremely low (i have 1 finger gap all around).

the last 2 'pro-series' ball joints i have bought also needed grease to be added as well.

i bought these camber arms a very long time ago and i had to shave them a bit as they were digging in the body of the car where those 2 bushings are located.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2012 | 07:03 PM
  #13  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

bump needs to be seen
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 07:44 PM
  #14  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

bump it up.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ej6sir-t
Suspension & Brakes
40
May 7, 2014 07:40 AM
civichb98
Suspension & Brakes
20
Aug 29, 2010 10:25 AM
tomek5x
Suspension & Brakes
2
Mar 13, 2008 05:38 PM
Vitt1
Tech / Misc
6
Dec 23, 2003 11:44 AM
4drRacer
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
Oct 12, 2003 09:55 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:23 PM.