what do u think on my choosen tranny ratio?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,567
Likes: 0
From: official euro R hospital, AUSTRIA
Okay..... I have stock a JDM tranny with
1st: 3.23
2nd: 2.105
3rd: 1.458
4th: 1.034
5th 0.787
FD: 4.785
traction sux but I like the second gear (on 0.45 Bar boost) for autoX, but it still could be a bit longer, cause I run out of revs sometimes.
My thoughts are to put in a 4.400 fd and the 1.107 4th gear to have a nice pulling gear for the 1/4 mile. I want to keep the 0.787 5th for autobahn top speed or perhaps switch to LS 5th sometimes.
I think it is a good deal on getting a bit better traction while having a nice AutoX tranny too. What do YOU think?
PS: I know GSR 2nd (1.9) would be better for traction too, but it would kinda suck at AutoX.
[Modified by austrian type-R, 12:48 PM 9/29/2002]
1st: 3.23
2nd: 2.105
3rd: 1.458
4th: 1.034
5th 0.787
FD: 4.785
traction sux but I like the second gear (on 0.45 Bar boost) for autoX, but it still could be a bit longer, cause I run out of revs sometimes.
My thoughts are to put in a 4.400 fd and the 1.107 4th gear to have a nice pulling gear for the 1/4 mile. I want to keep the 0.787 5th for autobahn top speed or perhaps switch to LS 5th sometimes.
I think it is a good deal on getting a bit better traction while having a nice AutoX tranny too. What do YOU think?
PS: I know GSR 2nd (1.9) would be better for traction too, but it would kinda suck at AutoX.
[Modified by austrian type-R, 12:48 PM 9/29/2002]
Stock at redline on GSR (in MPH):
40.80
69.37
96.91
127.46
167.47
Your JDM tranny at redline (in MPH):
37.52
57.57
83.12
117.21
153.99
Your modified setup (in MPH):
40.80
62.61
90.40
119.06
167.47
Keep In mind I did these calculations using my gear ratio calculator which is set up to calculate with my 215/40/17 tires.
[Modified by integra-modder, 10:13 AM 9/29/2002]
40.80
69.37
96.91
127.46
167.47
Your JDM tranny at redline (in MPH):
37.52
57.57
83.12
117.21
153.99
Your modified setup (in MPH):
40.80
62.61
90.40
119.06
167.47
Keep In mind I did these calculations using my gear ratio calculator which is set up to calculate with my 215/40/17 tires.
[Modified by integra-modder, 10:13 AM 9/29/2002]
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,567
Likes: 0
From: official euro R hospital, AUSTRIA
thx dude, but I own myself a calc programm 
My redline is at 9000
and my tire is 225/45/16
, that means equal to yours
[Modified by austrian type-R, 4:34 PM 9/29/2002]

My redline is at 9000
and my tire is 225/45/16
, that means equal to yours[Modified by austrian type-R, 4:34 PM 9/29/2002]
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,567
Likes: 0
From: official euro R hospital, AUSTRIA
What the hell, I thought this is an all out tech board dedicated to Hondas. My question is by far better than usual supercharger vs turbo or how to turbocharge this or that, or what compression for how much boost QUESTIONS!
This thread has
Which Turbo Upgrade for WRX? has 28 replies and 434 views and has absolutly nothing to do with Hondas
MY thread only has 2 replies, which are not informative for me.
This thread has
Which Turbo Upgrade for WRX? has 28 replies and 434 views and has absolutly nothing to do with Hondas
MY thread only has 2 replies, which are not informative for me.
download this excel file....
http://www.hondaswap.com/files/netmph.xls
its a better version (IMO) of a net mile per hour based on tire size and gear ratios.
give speed based on RPM from 700- 10000

As for your rant about no one replying... what exactly are you asking???
to me, it was more of a long comment than a question.
are you asking what is better for autox while still keeping some acceleration? I'm not quite sure, and others probably aren't either. so please, don't be jumpy like that. Thanks
[Modified by delvtecsol, 4:36 AM 9/30/2002]
http://www.hondaswap.com/files/netmph.xls
its a better version (IMO) of a net mile per hour based on tire size and gear ratios.
give speed based on RPM from 700- 10000

As for your rant about no one replying... what exactly are you asking???
to me, it was more of a long comment than a question.
are you asking what is better for autox while still keeping some acceleration? I'm not quite sure, and others probably aren't either. so please, don't be jumpy like that. Thanks
[Modified by delvtecsol, 4:36 AM 9/30/2002]
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
austrian type-R
Forced Induction
1
Dec 28, 2002 06:28 AM





