99 jdm itr compression test numbers..03-22-2011
like title says its 99 jdm itr, i got numbers 265across the board. I'm very happy with the results also thinking about taking it to dyno any suggestions. Comments are welcome enjoy...
I dont really understand what you're trying to get out of this thread. Clue me in. All I see is higher than average compression numbers for an itr swap. Am I missing something?
Congrats on having a very healthy motor? Sorry dude, I dont really know what your getting at.
Congrats on having a very healthy motor? Sorry dude, I dont really know what your getting at.
I just wanted it to share, if you dont like it my thread I can't convince you.
Thanks that's what I think it an healthy motor for 12 years old. Should I dyno tune it or leave it stock with an Itr ecu, I'm running p73-003.
Thanks that's what I think it an healthy motor for 12 years old. Should I dyno tune it or leave it stock with an Itr ecu, I'm running p73-003.
Now I understand why you posted it. Thats damn good for a 12 year old motor. I kinda figured it was freshly rebuilt or something. Now thats impressive. That motor must have been very well taken care of. Good stuff 
Sorry if I came off like a douche at first, I see so many useless threads I just kinda figured this one was par for the course. Good stuff though.

Sorry if I came off like a douche at first, I see so many useless threads I just kinda figured this one was par for the course. Good stuff though.
Trending Topics
1) Compression testers are all different, that's great that you have similar #'s across the board, but the number is pretty irrelevant. You can have a brand new motor with no miles with a different compression tester that shows lower compression. Why everyone jumps all over compression test #'s is beyond me.
2) Leakdown would do a much better job of telling you the health of the motor.
3) If you are going to the dyno, it's only useful to compare it to other cars on the same dyno. Again, different dynos read different, yahda yahda. Not good for comparing to other internet compression tests or dyno #'s.
2) Leakdown would do a much better job of telling you the health of the motor.
3) If you are going to the dyno, it's only useful to compare it to other cars on the same dyno. Again, different dynos read different, yahda yahda. Not good for comparing to other internet compression tests or dyno #'s.
Now I understand why you posted it. Thats damn good for a 12 year old motor. I kinda figured it was freshly rebuilt or something. Now thats impressive. That motor must have been very well taken care of. Good stuff 
Sorry if I came off like a douche at first, I see so many useless threads I just kinda figured this one was par for the course. Good stuff though.

Sorry if I came off like a douche at first, I see so many useless threads I just kinda figured this one was par for the course. Good stuff though.

1) Compression testers are all different, that's great that you have similar #'s across the board, but the number is pretty irrelevant. You can have a brand new motor with no miles with a different compression tester that shows lower compression. Why everyone jumps all over compression test #'s is beyond me.
2) Leakdown would do a much better job of telling you the health of the motor.
3) If you are going to the dyno, it's only useful to compare it to other cars on the same dyno. Again, different dynos read different, yahda yahda. Not good for comparing to other internet compression tests or dyno #'s.
2) Leakdown would do a much better job of telling you the health of the motor.
3) If you are going to the dyno, it's only useful to compare it to other cars on the same dyno. Again, different dynos read different, yahda yahda. Not good for comparing to other internet compression tests or dyno #'s.
1) Compression testers are all different, that's great that you have similar #'s across the board, but the number is pretty irrelevant. You can have a brand new motor with no miles with a different compression tester that shows lower compression. Why everyone jumps all over compression test #'s is beyond me.
2) Leakdown would do a much better job of telling you the health of the motor.
3) If you are going to the dyno, it's only useful to compare it to other cars on the same dyno. Again, different dynos read different, yahda yahda. Not good for comparing to other internet compression tests or dyno #'s.
2) Leakdown would do a much better job of telling you the health of the motor.
3) If you are going to the dyno, it's only useful to compare it to other cars on the same dyno. Again, different dynos read different, yahda yahda. Not good for comparing to other internet compression tests or dyno #'s.
BTW, higher than normal compression numbers (if the reading is in fact accurate) *could* be the result of something like carbon buildup. Also, as sort of a reference point, my extremely low mileage 97 jdm ITR engine read 240 +- 2 psi across the board using your exact same gauge.
As said above, if the gauge is indeed accurate, would indicate buildup of carbon on the tops of pistons and in the combustion chamber in head and filling the dishes on the valve faces. If I were you, I would borrow another tester from auto zone etc. And do another test. I would also run a couple of bottles of redline fuel system cleaner to get the carbon cleaned out.
If it is indeed carbon buildup, then a tune is a must as you must be running very rich to generate that type of buildup.
If it is indeed carbon buildup, then a tune is a must as you must be running very rich to generate that type of buildup.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fly_high_gsr
Hybrid / Engine Swaps
6
Jan 21, 2011 04:37 PM
TEAM562racing
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
1
Oct 15, 2003 01:55 PM




