**catch can?? is it neccesary?**

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 09:24 PM
  #1  
ELUD THS's Avatar
Thread Starter
New User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,126
Likes: 0
From: RICHMOND, VA, UNITED STATES
Default **catch can?? is it neccesary?**

is the catch can neccesary at all to utilize? how many people that are boosted use one??
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 09:34 PM
  #2  
Ri5e's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 0
From: Northern, VA
Default Re: **catch can?? is it neccesary?** (ELUD THS)

i had one. got rid of it.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 10:10 PM
  #3  
PrecisionH23a's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 14,296
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Default Re: **catch can?? is it neccesary?** (ELUD THS)

its not neccessary, but it helps keep my engine from oil being sprayed all over the manifold as well as fire wall. i dont spray oil a lot, but after time it adds up. some engines differ when it comes to crankcase ventilation problems.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 10:49 PM
  #4  
shadowdawn's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere, NJ, USA
Default Re: **catch can?? is it neccesary?** (GudeH23a)

I simply attached a hose to mine and pointed it downwards.... it hasn't spray much of anything ever.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 10:52 PM
  #5  
sutrusu's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,000
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY, usa
Default Re: **catch can?? is it neccesary?** (shadowdawn)

i'm rocking the APC beather filter. and yes, i know this is bad for it. and no, i dont care.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 11:07 PM
  #6  
rjardy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
From: Prescott Arizona
Default Re: **catch can?? is it neccesary?** (sutrusu)

i'm rocking the APC beather filter. and yes, i know this is bad for it. and no, i dont care.
how is this bad?


Rob
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 02:32 AM
  #7  
sutrusu's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,000
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY, usa
Default Re: **catch can?? is it neccesary?** (rjardy)

the system needs pressure in order to work proporly, or something.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 02:59 AM
  #8  
BLKCRX's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Vic, Australia
Default Re: **catch can?? is it neccesary?** (sutrusu)

ok seems like iv been doin it wrong my self.. then...
when i was running low boost 7psi i was running a filter off my valve cover.. just a small one..which used have a pipe going from the valve cover back into the intake piping...

now im planing on running from the valve cover a oil catch can.. and also from the back of the block off some valve.. forgot what its called..and then run a filter off the catch can....

but if i understand this... im better to run the value cover breather back into the intake system ? yeah ? or do i go.. valve clover.. catch can... intake system.. ?
PS now im plani on runnin 20 - 30psi


Regards James
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 07:03 AM
  #9  
downpipe's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: a galaxy far, far, away..., USA
Default Re: **catch can?? is it neccesary?** (BLKCRX)

the valve cover intake is supposed to function as a fresh-air intake for the pcv system. the crankcase vapors are vented out the back of the block via the pcv valve, which opens when it senses vacuum from the manifold. the problem here is that all of that oily crap gets sucked into your intake manifold and into your motor, increasing the likelyhood for detonation to occur.

under boost it's a slightly different story...the pcv valve needs vacuum to open, so when the engine is boosting it closes. that means there is nowhere for the blow-by to go except out the valve cover intake. that it why peoeple find oil on their valve cover breathers, and also why you don't want to run a hose from the valve cover intake to the intake piping (pre-turbo). you could be sucking oily-vapor-blowby right through your whole system under boost when the pcv valve closes and forces the gases out the intake - certainly the worst time to be injesting oil!

some people have told me that you need vacuum to help suck out the crankcase vapors properly, some say they'll come out fine on their own anyway. as we see, that all changes under boost anyway since boost will force the pcv valve closed.

considering all these factors, the best application for FI is proabably:

valve cover breather---->(crankcase)-->stock accumulator----->no pcv valve----->catchcan----->breather (on end of catchcan, not connected the the intake at all)

the closed loop option woud be:

valve cover breather tube connected pre-turbo------> (crankcase)--->stock accumulator----->catchcan----->pcv valve------>intake manifold

the second option will still allow oily vapors back in, just less. (be sure to use a baffled catchcan, or fill an unbaffeled can w/ steel wool). but remember, under boost the pcv valve will still be closed, and unless you are using the valve cover breather you could still wind up with oily vapor in the intkae charge.

anyways, good luck with whatever option you choose.

greg
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 09:46 AM
  #10  
psileepR's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 0
From: Cypress, CA, USA
Default Re: **catch can?? is it neccesary?** (downpipe)

so thats what that third line going into my intake was... thanks for the informative breakdown
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
THEDirtyDseriesWOOT
Forced Induction
2
Aug 31, 2006 01:23 PM
bigstatik
Forced Induction
9
Jul 18, 2003 02:04 PM
uneekcrx
Forced Induction
14
May 18, 2002 07:53 AM
1fstevo
Forced Induction
17
Jan 27, 2002 02:08 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:15 PM.