Is anyone here running the ATP divided GT30?...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2007 | 12:46 PM
  #1  
*Boostwerks*'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,455
Likes: 3
From: I heart tool, US
Default Is anyone here running the ATP divided GT30?...

I'm going to be getting the housing for my 3082R unless I can find a divided housing with a larger A/R. ATP only offers a .78ar, and I'd prefer to use a housing with at least 1.0 to really take advantage of the twin scrowl. If anyone knows of another option out there, please let me know!

I'm curious though if anyone is currently running the .78 ATP housing, and what they think of it?

Thanks!
Bryson
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2007 | 05:34 PM
  #2  
boostismycrack's Avatar
E-thug
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans, La, USA
Default Re: Is anyone here running the ATP divided GT30?... (Boostwerks.com)

I have this housing on my 35r. made 450ish at 14psi, my tuner thinks it may be a restriction at higher boost levels though...
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #3  
HiProfile's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 7
From: b00sting my D16s, SoWis, USA
Default Re: Is anyone here running the ATP divided GT30?... (Boostwerks.com)

Well the GT30 technically uses a T3-comprable turbine, and you also have the supposed benifit of the engineering behind the GT turbine wheel. If people can manage 500+ whp out of a stg5 .82 T3 tubine with an aged turbine fin design, I would imagine you wont find the GT30's limit as easy as you might think.

But please continue to dig, this is the turbo I want eventually for a monster daily driver.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #4  
*Boostwerks*'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,455
Likes: 3
From: I heart tool, US
Default Re: Is anyone here running the ATP divided GT30?... (boostismycrack)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boostismycrack &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I have this housing on my 35r. made 450ish at 14psi, my tuner thinks it may be a restriction at higher boost levels though...</TD></TR></TABLE>

Any graphs, and more info on your setup? I'm curious how the spool compares to other 35r setups, and if there are signs the torque starts to fall off. How do you like the response of the turbo? Have you had anything else to compare it too?

Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 06:24 AM
  #5  
JDogg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,072
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
Default Re: Is anyone here running the ATP divided GT30?... (Boostwerks.com)

the atp housing works really good

we replaced a stock manifold/gt28rs setup on a 240/sr20 with a full race divided t3/divided atp gt3071 a little while ago... the 3071 setup spooled a good 1000 rpms faster than the 28rs setup and made about 45 more hp at the same boost.

500hp is deffinatly capable with a gt3071
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 08:46 AM
  #6  
Topdawgg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, NS Canada
Default

wow.. i didnt realise the divided housing works that good
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 09:24 AM
  #7  
*Boostwerks*'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,455
Likes: 3
From: I heart tool, US
Default Re: Is anyone here running the ATP divided GT30?... (JDogg)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDogg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the atp housing works really good

we replaced a stock manifold/gt28rs setup on a 240/sr20 with a full race divided t3/divided atp gt3071 a little while ago... the 3071 setup spooled a good 1000 rpms faster than the 28rs setup and made about 45 more hp at the same boost.

500hp is deffinatly capable with a gt3071</TD></TR></TABLE>

NICE! Any graphs? Did the top end fall off at all? Thats exactly what I'm looking from my setup. Very quick spool, and a nice 400whp on E85. All that on a stock internal B16.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #8  
mymeatb18
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
From: miramar, fl, USA
Default Re: Is anyone here running the ATP divided GT30?... (Boostwerks.com)

i'd like to see some graphs as well. should look interesting.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 10:02 AM
  #9  
JDogg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,072
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
Default Re: Is anyone here running the ATP divided GT30?... (Boostwerks.com)

not sure if we still have the dyno graphs, it has been a while.

the tq carried out very very well. i wouldnt say it choked it up on top end, the graph was consistent up top with what i have seen with similar setups w/the 0.82ar undivided turbine housings.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 10:16 AM
  #10  
*Boostwerks*'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,455
Likes: 3
From: I heart tool, US
Default Re: Is anyone here running the ATP divided GT30?... (JDogg)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDogg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">not sure if we still have the dyno graphs, it has been a while.

the tq carried out very very well. i wouldnt say it choked it up on top end, the graph was consistent up top with what i have seen with similar setups w/the 0.82ar undivided turbine housings.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Excellent! The reason I asked about the torque falling off, is that my buddy switched to a divided housing/manifold on his 40R and at the same boost the torque started falling off compared to the undivided housing. The spool was indeed a lot better, but for some reason the torque seemed to be falling off.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 02:41 PM
  #11  
boostismycrack's Avatar
E-thug
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans, La, USA
Default Re: Is anyone here running the ATP divided GT30?... (Boostwerks.com)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Boostwerks.com &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Any graphs, and more info on your setup? I'm curious how the spool compares to other 35r setups, and if there are signs the torque starts to fall off. How do you like the response of the turbo? Have you had anything else to compare it too?

</TD></TR></TABLE>

Here is the dyno graph at 14psi. 84.5 mm gsr, type r cams, ported head, ramhorn, etc... Its a pretty basic setup unfortunately I can't give u any feedback because I never got to drive it. My sleeves sank and it blew the headgasket b4 I went to pick it up from my tuner. It should be back up and new dyno results soon though...
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 05:23 PM
  #12  
*Boostwerks*'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,455
Likes: 3
From: I heart tool, US
Default

So is the manifold divided then? I havn't seen any 4-1 2-3 paired ramhorns. Either way, that is definetly a very nice curve. Over 350ft/lbs of torque before 5 grand...can't beat that.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 05:46 PM
  #13  
boostismycrack's Avatar
E-thug
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans, La, USA
Default Re: (Boostwerks.com)

its actually 250 hp 250 trq b4 5k, but either way should b a beast on the street... Manifold is NOT divided. This turbine housing was chosen because it was the only one I could find to clear the 3" dp with a/c. We will see what the exhaust housing's limits are soon enough.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 05:54 PM
  #14  
*Boostwerks*'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,455
Likes: 3
From: I heart tool, US
Default Re: (boostismycrack)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boostismycrack &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">its actually 250 hp 250 trq b4 5k, but either way should b a beast on the street... Manifold is NOT divided. This turbine housing was chosen because it was the only one I could find to clear the 3" dp with a/c. We will see what the exhaust housing's limits are soon enough.</TD></TR></TABLE>

lol... I can't beleive I misread the graph.

But I think the divided housing will actually hurt performance, unless it's used with a divided manifold. Although the power your making is still impressive, the benefits of the housing isn't shown.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 06:06 PM
  #15  
boostismycrack's Avatar
E-thug
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans, La, USA
Default Re: (Boostwerks.com)

no it isn't u are right. U wana make me a divided manifold that is a/c compatible for comparison? LOL!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
550whpcivic
Forced Induction
3
Jan 31, 2011 02:59 PM
IGotVTECyo
Forced Induction
8
Oct 2, 2007 07:51 AM
Turbocivic94
Forced Induction
11
Sep 27, 2005 09:45 AM
acuracy r
Forced Induction
11
Feb 21, 2005 10:36 PM
d98clturbo
Forced Induction
7
May 26, 2003 08:54 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:46 AM.