GT 35/40R vs T3/T67

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 03:50 AM
  #1  
itr_18's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Warsaw, Poland, POLAND
Default GT 35/40R vs T3/T67

I used all this season GT 35/40R .70 in my Civic.
This turbocharger is good, Ive reached on it 600HP. But im thinking about changing on other, maybe T3/T67.
Any ideas which will be better?
Why im thinking about change? Im racing in Poland and there is no drag strip, most of races are on airport's without vht, so the traction is bad. T3/T67 which is without BB might be better for this conditions than 35/40R (BB) or im wrong?

Car info:
B16A
Benson sleeves 84mm
9.1 pistons
Autronic standalone ecu
Track only car
Score 600HP
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 06:17 AM
  #2  
TheShodan's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24,555
Likes: 241
From: City of Wind, IL, USA
Default Re: GT 35/40R vs T3/T67 (itr_18)

See my comments

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread/1760132
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 06:23 AM
  #3  
itr_18's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Warsaw, Poland, POLAND
Default

Thanks but no answers on my questions
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 09:31 AM
  #4  
boostedcivicsir's Avatar
Mr. Badwrench
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 14,146
Likes: 2
From: stranger in a strange land
Default Re: (itr_18)

if you are making 600 now, the t3t67 isnt gonna get you that much higher. f-r geoff has told me that since i have the p trim option on mine, a t4 divided housing will net a bigger gain later. but a straight t3t67 i dont think will give you your goal.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Destructive-
Forced Induction
1
Jul 5, 2010 08:23 PM
Mugencrxsir1
Forced Induction
5
Feb 26, 2006 04:17 PM
peiku
Forced Induction
2
Feb 7, 2005 12:11 PM
COLORPROS
Forced Induction
2
Jan 27, 2005 10:29 AM
Pat
Forced Induction
1
Oct 13, 2002 03:12 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:25 PM.