what do you guys think if you had 2 of the exhaust header pieces come into one pipe and thesame on the other side(yes im talking about a 4 cyl.)for a true dual exhaust from the headers bask,just an idea.

 

this one is almost as good as your other posts

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by delguy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what do you guys think if you had 2 of the exhaust header pieces come into one pipe and thesame on the other side(yes im talking about a 4 cyl.)for a true dual exhaust from the headers bask,just an idea.</TD></TR></TABLE>

...those salmon eggs must be getting to your head



Modified by Autoworks at 12:27 AM 10/17/2005

 

why not just go the distance and do the quad exhaust!

if not that, maybe some diesel stacks or side pipes like old muscle cars!

 

like i said it was just an idea,you guys complain and nag about anything.

why wouldnt it work?

 

It would work,just not as well as a four into one or a four into two into one.You would give up half of the scavenging pulses.
Glenn

 

thanks for real answer

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Autoworks &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

...those salmon eggs must be getting to your head

Modified by Autoworks at 12:27 AM 10/17/2005</TD></TR></TABLE>

its either that or the butt s3x

 

i think your back pressure would be messed up like this ?

 

needing backpressure is a myth. you don't need it.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JdmB16Eg6 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i think your back pressure would be messed up like this ?</TD></TR></TABLE>

thats why when you run your 4 individual pipe "quad header" you make each one of them out of 1/4" tubing, so you'll have efficient back pressure

 

ok i beleive ths same as flight50 that you dont need backpressure, so explain and give me examples of why you need back pressure.

 

You do need a certain amount of backpressure on a driveable street car

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Autoworks &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You do need a certain amount of backpressure on a driveable street car</TD></TR></TABLE>

Nope.

 

just to clarify, i was being sarcastic. the whole 'backpressure" issue has been discussed to death, so if you really still belive that your engine needs backpressure, please do a search or google exhaust gas velocity vs. backpressure

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by delguy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what do you guys think if you had 2 of the exhaust header pieces come into one pipe and thesame on the other side(yes im talking about a 4 cyl.)for a true dual exhaust from the headers bask,just an idea.</TD></TR></TABLE>

so there would be no issues and it would be okay to do this exhaust setup?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by delguy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

so there would be no issues and it would be okay to do this exhaust setup?</TD></TR></TABLE>

not likely. if it yeilded gains there would be people running simular setups. there are reasons for the pairing of the primaries. some light reading for yah compliments of burns stainless....http://www.burnsstainless.com/....html

 

I quit at life.

 

back pressure and velocity are 2 different things ,
you DO NOT need back pressure , velocity on the other hand is a good thinkg to have . back pressure is a restriction and doesnt allow for the best flow . a properly design header with the right size of piping will not only be efficient but will have good velocity for good scavenging .


if im wrong please correct me

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NJIN BUILDR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It would work,just not as well as a four into one or a four into two into one.You would give up half of the scavenging pulses.
Glenn</TD></TR></TABLE>

I think I used the key word,yup I'm sure I did.It had something to due with pulling the spent gasses out of the port and helping pull the air/fuel in.Yup that was the word.
Glenn