Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 12:19 PM
  #1  
Steri's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az, USA
Default Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78

Like the title says I'm in Arizona and my B16a1 failed emissions with a CO level of 2.78.
I've got one shop saying that the problems are probably with ecu and wiring. One of my o2 sensors is disconnected with a jumper at the ecu. My idle is really lopey and my gas mileage is in the 22mpg range.
The shop that did the swap is saying its probably the cat and I should just replace that. Does anyone have diagnostic suggestions?
Does either theory sound more likely?
I need to pass emissions because I already got one ticket and I don't want more. Please help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Also what do you guys think of the jumpered o2 sensor what is the point of that? why not just wire up the second o2 sensor?


Modified by 89EF_Sleeper Si at 3:48 PM 10/7/2005
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 12:24 PM
  #2  
Bee17hatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, il, US
Default Re: Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78 (89EF_Sleeper Si)

what ecu are you using right now?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 12:30 PM
  #3  
Steri's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az, USA
Default Re: Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78 (Bee17hatch)

Good question my car is at the shop and I actually haven't checked. Is there a big difference, and how might different ecus effect performance?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 01:01 PM
  #4  
Steri's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az, USA
Default Re: Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78 (89EF_Sleeper Si)

Please anyone!?!!! I know I may sound like a noob and maybe I shouldn't even have my car at a shop but I am really busy! I run a custom computer buisness as well as being a double major in csc and math and I need help working this out!
Any ideas would be helpful!
Thank you ahead of time for any ideas you may have!
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 01:08 PM
  #5  
fourthgenhatchB17's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 2
From: 60ft garage, CA, USA
Default Re: Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78 (89EF_Sleeper Si)

Wire up the O2's properly...thats a given.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 01:20 PM
  #6  
Losrocket_'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, Az
Default Re: Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78 (fourthgenhatchB17)

I'd replace the cat before messing with any wiring. Anybody i have ever known thats failed emissions has replaced the cat and passed no problem. A high flow cat can be had for less than $100, a stock one probably even cheaper. Try that first and if it doesnt work then look at the wiring. Good luck
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 01:29 PM
  #7  
OverCorrupt's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

most definetly try a new cat.. i failed emissions with ALL the numbers high really really high, if i find my slip i'll post it.. the shop told me i needed so much **** done and i told them no.. i went and got a new cat made them put it on and i pased with no problems... Gutted cat= failed immisions instant
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 01:32 PM
  #8  
fernruffryders's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: 619, CALIFORNIA, US
Default Re: Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78 (89EF_Sleeper Si)

ure lucky, 2.78 CO... Mine was 10.8, getting 11 mpg, sucks major ***. good luck though. try the cat, sounds reasonable, ill try it too.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 01:42 PM
  #9  
Steri's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az, USA
Default Re: Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78 (fernruffryders)

Thanks everyone! The cat sounds like a good start! Man I'm glad my mileage isn't as bad as yours fernruffryders. I have an appt. with the shop that did my swap for a new cat, is there anything else I should replace as a precaution? I'll also wire up the secondary o2 sensor since its not much of an effort anyway!
I really appreciate the ideas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 03:18 PM
  #10  
drussell4801's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Northern, VA, USA
Default Re: Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78 (89EF_Sleeper Si)

like was said above, a new cat will almost guarantee you to pass.

Take of the old one, gut it. Put a new one on for the test. Go back home and put back on the gutted one. Save the new one until you're due for emissions again. That's what I did.

I would still fix the wiring though..
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 03:19 PM
  #11  
doublethink's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 2
From: long island, ny, usa
Default Re: Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78 (89EF_Sleeper Si)

make sure both o2's are wired up, and going to the correct pins on the ecu.



this will increase gas milage and help with emmisions, and make the car run properly at WOT especially between 3,000 and 5,000 rpm. just do a search here on the crx section for "bogging" if you want to see what you're in for if you try to cheat.

you should then have no check engine lights for any sensors. you should make sure your vaccum lines are all hooked up to OEM spec so the units on the firewall are all hooked up.

basically any corner cutting or little horsepower tricks are going to hurt you here if you trying to be 100% legit with this.

you could replace: the cat, both o2's and even the fuel filter....

you could LIGHTLY seafoam the engine and blow a lot of the carbon buildup out of the exhaust.

if all else fails find someone who likes to get creative if you know what i mean. if you dont, forget that last sentance or ill have to kill you.

seriously tho, good luck to you.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 03:50 PM
  #12  
Steri's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az, USA
Default Re: Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78 (doublethink)

Thanks doublethink I'll hook up both o2 sensors. There are no codes however because the shop that did the swap split the line from one o2 into both recieving spots on the ecu. Vacuum lines sound like a likely cause for the lopeing idle so I'll go over those as well.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 04:41 PM
  #13  
ham's Avatar
ham
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,829
Likes: 2
From: Detroit
Default Re: Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78 (89EF_Sleeper Si)

i wonder if that would work if you used a diode, so there was no interference. the ecu would think you had 2 o2s?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 05:30 PM
  #14  
doublethink's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 2
From: long island, ny, usa
Default Re: Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78 (ham)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ham &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i wonder if that would work if you used a diode, so there was no interference. the ecu would think you had 2 o2s?</TD></TR></TABLE>

PRE OBD b16a ecus (pr3 and pw0) require two seperate o2 sensor signals. one collects cylinders 1 and 3, the other does 2 and 4.

you really cant fake it, its best to do what the ecu wants to ensure a clean running engine.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 09:09 PM
  #15  
89HatchSI's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Topeka, KS, USA
Default Re: Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78 (89EF_Sleeper Si)

thank god i dont ahve emissions or any registrations to worry about after a motor swap!
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 10:23 PM
  #16  
ham's Avatar
ham
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,829
Likes: 2
From: Detroit
Default Re: Arizona B16a1 failed emissions CO level 2.78 (89HatchSI)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 89HatchSI &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thank god i dont ahve emissions or any registrations to worry about after a motor swap! </TD></TR></TABLE>

word. im happy but at the same time im pissed when i get smoked out by 80s caravan that burns more oil than gas.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 04:37 AM
  #17  
SETI20's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,159
Likes: 1
From: GTA Canada
Default

Holy crap....

Don't listen to anyone who tries to tell you it's the cat. I passed emissions WITHOUT cat at 0.42 co.
Clean running engine and decent gas is the key.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 09:14 AM
  #18  
ham's Avatar
ham
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,829
Likes: 2
From: Detroit
Default Re: (SETI20)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SETI20 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Holy crap....

Don't listen to anyone who tries to tell you it's the cat. I passed emissions WITHOUT cat at 0.42 co.
Clean running engine and decent gas is the key.</TD></TR></TABLE>

yes i agree, it seems like he is just running rich. The cat does help control HC, co2 and nox but its not going to work if you are running too rich.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 05:33 PM
  #19  
Steri's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az, USA
Default Re: (ham)

Hey ham just for your reference you wouldn't use a diode you would use a resistor to trick the ecu. It absolutely works I did it with an obdII d16 and passed emissions no prob. The ecu just looks for a specific range of resistance coming from the o2 sensor so a resistor that falls within that range looks exactly the same to the ecu.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 05:43 PM
  #20  
ham's Avatar
ham
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,829
Likes: 2
From: Detroit
Default Re: (89EF_Sleeper Si)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 89EF_Sleeper Si &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hey ham just for your reference you wouldn't use a diode you would use a resistor to trick the ecu. It absolutely works I did it with an obdII d16 and passed emissions no prob. The ecu just looks for a specific range of resistance coming from the o2 sensor so a resistor that falls within that range looks exactly the same to the ecu.</TD></TR></TABLE>

the ecu looks for voltage not resistance, you gave it a trick voltage. good idea for a cheap loop hole!

my idea with the diode was to provide two mV signals to the ECU with one o2 sensor. The ECU would think it was receiving the 2 signals. The purpose of the diode is to possibly help with interference, it would only let the current flow the forward direction. so one o2 to c8, then a diode from c8 to c16.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 02:49 PM
  #21  
Steri's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az, USA
Default Re: (ham)

You're absolutly right ham, I had a couples beers last night and my brain subsequently farted. What I meant was the o2 sensor creates different amounts of resistance based on the composition of the exhaust gasses. If anything is wrong the ECU reads a voltage that is outside of the "safe" voltage range and throws a code just like you said. All I meant was that the desired resistance that produces the proper voltage reading was not there so the ecu doesn't "see" the desired result. You're right the ecu doesn't look for resistance there's no need for it to, its implied.

You're idea about a diode is a great one I'm going out to the electronics store right now to buy one. The shop that did my swap just put a jumper wire between c8 and c16 and a diode would be an easy way to keep that setup safe untill I have time to wire up the second o2. My car is a testament that your idea works.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 03:36 PM
  #22  
Steri's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az, USA
Default Re: (89EF_Sleeper Si)

On the subject of my car problems I cleaned the IACV following the instructions here
http://www.g2ic.com/forums/sho...35534

Then I set the Idle to factory specs and she runs beautifully. To diagnose my idle problem I used this page
http://www.ef-honda.com/ben/ under the tech section.

I'll take her to smog testing tomorrow and see if that cleared it up or if I should still try a new cat.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 06:35 PM
  #23  
ham's Avatar
ham
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,829
Likes: 2
From: Detroit
Default Re: (89EF_Sleeper Si)

good luck
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ReSpade
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
25
Mar 23, 2014 09:22 PM
cs1985
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
4
Mar 5, 2008 11:21 AM
Turbo_Mike
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
5
Jul 1, 2007 06:38 PM
dstring20
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
6
Jun 2, 2004 05:08 PM
Night_Minx
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
1
Jul 20, 2002 11:40 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:15 PM.