Whats a better comp ratio?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 04:01 PM
  #1  
95turbogsr's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Eielson AFB, ak, 99702
Default Whats a better comp ratio?

My stock ratio is 10.0:1 but i want to go to 9.0:1 or 8.8:1 for my turbo setup anyone have any suggestions on which is better or if i should just keep my stock ratio?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #2  
s2kdre's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
From: Skmotoring.com
Default Re: Whats a better comp ratio? (95turbogsr)

10:0 is perfect on a gsr cause the stroke isnt the same as an ls so you wanna make a little more tourque, i think 9:0 is too low in my opinion, if you sleeve it you can still run 30+ psi in any compression.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 04:29 PM
  #3  
s2kdre's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
From: Skmotoring.com
Default Re: Whats a better comp ratio? (jdmhonda)

tony the tiger on here is runnin 11:5 on his gsr with no probs, its all in the tunning
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 05:08 PM
  #4  
beerbongskickass's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 1
From: WA
Default Re: Whats a better comp ratio? (jdmhonda)

Is this a daily driver on pump gas? If it is then 9:1 is the norm...
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 05:40 PM
  #5  
non-VTEC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 2
From: Toronto, Canada
Default Re: Whats a better comp ratio? (95turbogsr)

i would keep it under 10:1........but above 9:1......CP sells nice 9.7:1 pistons which would be perfect!
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 05:42 PM
  #6  
s2kdre's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
From: Skmotoring.com
Default Re: Whats a better comp ratio? (non-VTEC)

yup, thats what i have 9:7, the only reason everybody used to run 9:0 back in the day is because they were using fmu's and afc's thats why, now we got better ems's
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 05:53 PM
  #7  
Chip's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Default Re: Whats a better comp ratio? (jdmhonda)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jdmhonda &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">10:0 is perfect on a gsr cause the stroke isnt the same as an ls so you wanna make a little more tourque, i think 9:0 is too low in my opinion, if you sleeve it you can still run 30+ psi in any compression.</TD></TR></TABLE>

WHY do you think 9:1 is too low? Is it because you have real data and knowledge, or is it just going by some stuff you heard on Honda-Tech? I just went from 10.5:1 compression to 8.5:1 compression, and my car still drives perfectly fine even without a turbo on it, thank you kindly. Jeff proved that 10:1 to 9:1 was worth barely any power off boost, and even not a very substantial difference on boost.

Here's a nice dyno overlay. One motor is 10.4:1 compression, one motor is 9.0:1 compression. Turbo sizes are fairly similar. You tell me which one is which. I mean, if 9:1 compression is just too low, shouldn't you be able to see a huge difference off boost from the low compression?

Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #8  
Muckman's Avatar
Moderator in Chief
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,506
Likes: 7
From: Buffalo, NY
Default Re: Whats a better comp ratio? (Chip)

You are absolutely right. Plus you can push out more power on pump gas!


Modified by Muckman at 10:39 PM 6/23/2005
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 06:10 PM
  #9  
s2kdre's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
From: Skmotoring.com
Default Re: Whats a better comp ratio? (Muckman)

i guess i got smoked on this one. lol
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 06:15 PM
  #10  
adseguy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,992
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN, U.S.A
Default Re: Whats a better comp ratio? (jdmhonda)

the GSR makes it's power by revving a lot higher and the VTEC head, not the compression contrary to popular belief.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 06:38 PM
  #11  
Muckman's Avatar
Moderator in Chief
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,506
Likes: 7
From: Buffalo, NY
Default Re: Whats a better comp ratio? (jdmhonda)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jdmhonda &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i guess i got smoked on this one. lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
Hey dont feel bad. I used to be a firm believer in high compression and boost too. It can be done, like Tony the Tiger has shown us but low compression is so much easier and safer to make big power with.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 06:47 PM
  #12  
95turbogsr's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Eielson AFB, ak, 99702
Default Re: Whats a better comp ratio? (Muckman)

The car will be my daily driver for now and pump gas as well. I asked becuase mt on friend said to keep my stock ratio but my other friend said if i dont lower it i will blow my motor apart so looks like 9.7:1 you guys were a great help im trying to run 10psi out my to4e with stock injectors and ecu i dont know if it can be done though either
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 06:58 PM
  #13  
beerbongskickass's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 1
From: WA
Default Re: Whats a better comp ratio? (95turbogsr)

Don't turbo your car with stock injectors. I would worry about fuel management before compression ratios anyways.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 07:10 PM
  #14  
Turbocivic94's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,002
Likes: 0
From: CT, USA
Default Re: Whats a better comp ratio? (Muckman)

Last year I was on 10:1 and this year I'm on 9:1
I want to make same #'s on pump that people make on race gas.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GSRkevTec
Forced Induction
4
Jul 4, 2016 08:12 PM
EJ8 GSR-T
Forced Induction
4
Oct 7, 2008 04:17 PM
jdmgsr94
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
10
Mar 30, 2007 02:29 PM
Nerologic
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
9
Apr 22, 2006 07:15 AM
Maxboost00
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
7
Oct 1, 2004 10:42 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:58 PM.