Whats a better comp ratio?
My stock ratio is 10.0:1 but i want to go to 9.0:1 or 8.8:1 for my turbo setup anyone have any suggestions on which is better or if i should just keep my stock ratio?
10:0 is perfect on a gsr cause the stroke isnt the same as an ls so you wanna make a little more tourque, i think 9:0 is too low in my opinion, if you sleeve it you can still run 30+ psi in any compression.
yup, thats what i have 9:7, the only reason everybody used to run 9:0 back in the day is because they were using fmu's and afc's thats why, now we got better ems's
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jdmhonda »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">10:0 is perfect on a gsr cause the stroke isnt the same as an ls so you wanna make a little more tourque, i think 9:0 is too low in my opinion, if you sleeve it you can still run 30+ psi in any compression.</TD></TR></TABLE>
WHY do you think 9:1 is too low? Is it because you have real data and knowledge, or is it just going by some stuff you heard on Honda-Tech? I just went from 10.5:1 compression to 8.5:1 compression, and my car still drives perfectly fine even without a turbo on it, thank you kindly. Jeff proved that 10:1 to 9:1 was worth barely any power off boost, and even not a very substantial difference on boost.
Here's a nice dyno overlay. One motor is 10.4:1 compression, one motor is 9.0:1 compression. Turbo sizes are fairly similar. You tell me which one is which. I mean, if 9:1 compression is just too low, shouldn't you be able to see a huge difference off boost from the low compression?
WHY do you think 9:1 is too low? Is it because you have real data and knowledge, or is it just going by some stuff you heard on Honda-Tech? I just went from 10.5:1 compression to 8.5:1 compression, and my car still drives perfectly fine even without a turbo on it, thank you kindly. Jeff proved that 10:1 to 9:1 was worth barely any power off boost, and even not a very substantial difference on boost.
Here's a nice dyno overlay. One motor is 10.4:1 compression, one motor is 9.0:1 compression. Turbo sizes are fairly similar. You tell me which one is which. I mean, if 9:1 compression is just too low, shouldn't you be able to see a huge difference off boost from the low compression?
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jdmhonda »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i guess i got smoked on this one. lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
Hey dont feel bad. I used to be a firm believer in high compression and boost too. It can be done, like Tony the Tiger has shown us but low compression is so much easier and safer to make big power with.
Hey dont feel bad. I used to be a firm believer in high compression and boost too. It can be done, like Tony the Tiger has shown us but low compression is so much easier and safer to make big power with.
The car will be my daily driver for now and pump gas as well. I asked becuase mt on friend said to keep my stock ratio but my other friend said if i dont lower it i will blow my motor apart so looks like 9.7:1 you guys were a great help im trying to run 10psi out my to4e with stock injectors and ecu i dont know if it can be done though either
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nerologic
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
9
Apr 22, 2006 07:15 AM




