ATTN (arturbo).48 or .63 AR, what are the suplemental reasons??????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 08:56 AM
  #1  
mrbsponge's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,103
Likes: 1
From: TDCperformance.net
Default ATTN (arturbo).48 or .63 AR, what are the suplemental reasons??????

as i have been switching thru a few different turbos, i have started to wonder

what is more for my set up a .63 or a .48 AR????

its an 8.5:1 B16 fully built, the head is mildly built, meaning i DONT rev to 10,xxx rpms, my cams wont make much power above 8500 anyways.

the problem im running into is i dont seem to be getting onto the turbo sweet spot of efficiency,

the turbo is a t3t4B .60cold, and .63 hot(turbonetics) machine and modified to accept the new super "V" trim wheel. it makes great boost and i am running 18psi on it but.........

now seeing that most D16-sohc's run .48 would there be any benefit to me doing the same???

i mean what amount of exahust volume or HP determines the AR you should use??

the guy who built my turbo now says i need a .48 and NOT the .63 that i have now, but is in fear that i will run into "turbine choke"


so what are the options i have?

i have made over 300hp on the same set up and turbo, but boost comes in so late(like 5100) and i really dont want to make power that late, would it kill me to run a .48?? or should i stay with the .63 and get something with more sompressor flow???

help me out please!

Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 09:05 AM
  #2  
Seraph0's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 0
From: TX, USA
Default Re: ATTN (arturbo).48 or .63 AR, what are the suplemental reasons?????? (mrbsponge)

Not Arturbo, but yeah I hate the Super-V.

I REALLY don't think you will like the .48 A/R tho. Power drops off dramatically in the upper RPM range.

The best thing you can do is change compressor wheels. Get a E .46 wheel or something.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 09:08 AM
  #3  
mrbsponge's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,103
Likes: 1
From: TDCperformance.net
Default

thats what i asked for when i got the dang thing done and this guy (and turbonetics) says that the "B" is more efficient and im like "WTF mate!"

i just think i would need to be near the 11,xxx rpm range to get in the area i need to be, and i drive this thing on the street and dont plan on going that high.


thanks much bro!
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 01:48 PM
  #4  
mrbsponge's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,103
Likes: 1
From: TDCperformance.net
Default

ttt
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 07:21 PM
  #5  
mrbsponge's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,103
Likes: 1
From: TDCperformance.net
Default

need some insight here please!
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 06:46 AM
  #6  
Aracheon's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Broomfield, Colorado, USA
Default

I'm assuming you want to make power higher up in your powerband, right? Like the other guy said, I think you'll be sorely disappointed with the .48 exhaust side. It doesn't flow enough air above ~6,000rpm to really see gains from it. A .63 is going to flow better for you in the top end, but it won't spool as fast.

There's a guy here locally who's running a 60 trim T3/T04e with a .48a/r and he's making a little over 400whp @ 22psi on a stock B18B1. It's all about what you plan on doing with it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
93first1
Forced Induction
5
Apr 5, 2006 05:12 AM
TheBobFather
Forced Induction
4
May 31, 2005 03:06 PM
wade
Forced Induction
10
Sep 15, 2004 03:20 PM
jfoster
Forced Induction
6
Mar 19, 2004 07:14 PM
BLKCRX
Forced Induction
35
Apr 23, 2003 01:13 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 AM.