Aluminum or conventional radiators?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 05:35 PM
  #1  
ex voto's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
From: Speedometer Durability Technician
Default Aluminum or conventional radiators?

I have a line on a aluminum radiator for my 91 EX for $250 shipped. Seeing as how the motor in the car will be mostly stock (no engine work... just add-ons and computer work... it will be a JDM DOHC ZC, tho) will I really need an aluminum radiator? The conventional ones go for about $90 shipped.

When/if you vote, please list pros and/or cons. Thankee-sai.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 05:44 PM
  #2  
drdisco69's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,914
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Default Re: Aluminum or conventional radiators? (ex voto)

Yay for vote #1.

Just to point out, aluminum is a shitty condutor of heat compared to copper. One of the main reasons some radiators are made of aluminum is that they bend when hit with tire walls and other cars, instead of cracking. They can also be welded very easily if they do break.

The stock radiator is so overkill for these cars, I love it. Unless you plan on beating the **** out of your car (physically, and I don't mean the motor ) stick with the regular one.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 06:06 PM
  #3  
Aragorn's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: In the woods of, NH, USA
Default Re: Aluminum or conventional radiators? (drdisco69)

To me it was simple when I had to replace my CRX's radiator..... That extra $160 helped by me an Exedy race clutch...... which is to say I think that moneys best spent somewhere other than a radiator (although a polished aluminum radiator does have more bling....)
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 06:14 PM
  #4  
GreenBean's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: WNC
Default Re: Aluminum or conventional radiators? (drdisco69)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by drdisco69 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yay for vote #1.

Just to point out, aluminum is a shitty condutor of heat compared to copper. One of the main reasons some radiators are made of aluminum is that they bend when hit with tire walls and other cars, instead of cracking. They can also be welded very easily if they do break.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 06:27 PM
  #5  
Rostr02's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: Glassport, Pa, US
Default Re: Aluminum or conventional radiators? (GreenBean)

#1
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 06:35 PM
  #6  
DieMaster's Avatar
Needs to be About 20% Cooler
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 1
From: San Bernardino, CA, USA
Default Re: Aluminum or conventional radiators? (Rostr02)

#1 2
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 09:01 PM
  #7  
M-doc yo!'s Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: SoCal, CA, USA
Default Re: Aluminum or conventional radiators? (DieMaster)

I say go buy an aluminum half radiator ('eg') off of eBay brand new for like 50 bucks shipped. The coppers ones are a dollar or 2 less.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 03:26 AM
  #8  
ex voto's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
From: Speedometer Durability Technician
Default Re: Aluminum or conventional radiators? (ex voto)

My my... conventional it is, I guess. I don't plan on doing much more than a swap and bolt ons, so I guess it would be just overkill... thanks for the input, all.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 05:21 AM
  #9  
StorminMatt's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,303
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA, USA
Default Re: Aluminum or conventional radiators? (drdisco69)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by drdisco69 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Just to point out, aluminum is a shitty condutor of heat compared to copper.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Aluminum may not conduct heat as well as copper. But conventional radiators are not made of copper. They are made of brass. Brass, as you may know, is a copper-zinc alloy. And alloying degrades thermal conductivity. Painting the fins (as is the case on a brass radiator) degrades heat transfer further. So bare aluminum is MUCH better than painted brass. On the other hand, a conventional radiator is probably good enough.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 07:11 AM
  #10  
doubleA's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities
Default Re: Aluminum or conventional radiators? (StorminMatt)

I use a stock aluminum half radiator in my crx I bought off of ebay, ITs worked great even under boost, never had a problem. spend your money elsewhere, I agree with Aragorn. To me it was simple when I had to replace my CRX's radiator..... That extra $160 helped by me an Exedy race clutch...... which is to say I think that moneys best spent somewhere other than a radiator
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 07:15 AM
  #11  
Surewin's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, WI
Default Re: Aluminum or conventional radiators? (StorminMatt)

Coefficient of heat transmission:

Aluminum .00203 BTU/Sec

Copper .00404 BTU/Sec

Brass yellow/red .00142/.00157 BTU/Sec

Heat transmitted in British thermal units, per second, through metal 1" thick, per square inch of surface, for a temperature difference of 1 degree F.

I like my cheap Auto Zone aluminum and plastic 90-93 Integra radiator.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AllMotorLudeSi
Honda Prelude
13
May 17, 2012 06:12 AM
91redteg
Acura Integra
10
Jul 3, 2007 04:42 PM
stickeyfingaz
Acura Integra
13
Dec 21, 2004 11:26 AM
joeg26er
Acura Integra
23
Jan 23, 2002 11:54 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:00 AM.