9.8:1 vs 9:1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 07:21 PM
  #1  
highboostb18c1's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Default 9.8:1 vs 9:1

i need opinions and maybe even dyno charts if you have them, i want to build my motor and don't know what compression i should do. its a daily driver so i was thinking 9.8:1 would be fine, i want to be able to run more then 8 psi safely. at 7 psi with drag kit and stock internals w/ vafc i only made...


i know
drag kit
boost
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #2  
Chip's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (highboostb18c1)

You will be happier being able to run more boost with the lower compression on pump gas. 9.8:1 is all fine and dandy for people running mammoth turbos that will make 400-450 WHP at like 12-14 pounds of boost, but for a typical T3/TO4E guy 9:1 + more boost is the way to go.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 08:13 PM
  #3  
justagsr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (Chip)

Just run 9:1 pistons with a cometic gasket and that will give you about 8.8:1 compression. You will be happy.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 08:24 PM
  #4  
mchuang's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: Dirty 3rd, Tx, USA
Default

I say 9:8:1 because with tuning capabilities and equipment these days you should safely be able to.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 08:54 PM
  #5  
b16sedan's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Default Re: (mchuang)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mchuang &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I say 9:8:1 because with tuning capabilities and equipment these days you should safely be able to. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Who gives a **** if you can run 9.8:1 and boost when you can make more pump gas power with 9:1 and boost. I am running 7.8:1 compression on my B16, and after having driven this I can say that everyone's interpretation on honda-tech of the huge loss in power and throttle reponse and turbo spool is far far exaggerated.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 09:39 PM
  #6  
.::Lee::.'s Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
From: Here in, Texas
Default Re: (b16coupe)

Just a suggestion. Ditch that VAFC before you build your motor. A good friend of mine destroyed a perfectly good built block (JE, Eagle) because of the overadvanced timing that the VAFC creates. After putting in a fresh B18, with stock internals, and switching to a standalone fuel management he has made in excess of 300 hp and ran a 12.1.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 09:48 PM
  #7  
earl's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,120
Likes: 3
From: Irvine, CA, usa
Default Re: (Ibiza)

If you run pump gas, 9-1 max. Spooling speed is tied to exhaust size, not c/r.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 11:09 PM
  #8  
DRIVENRacing's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC, USA
Default

im ruing 9.8.1... loving the low end power...
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 12:48 AM
  #9  
FOrSfEd's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 0
From: TurBlowVille, SC, USA
Default Re: (TurboHybridEG6)

I'm running 10.5.1 and I'm really loving it. IMP great for a daily driver.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 02:43 AM
  #10  
swlabhot's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 1
From: Planet BOOOST
Default Re: (FOrSfEd)

I ran 11:1 cr on stock block for about a year and now I've dropped it to 9:1 with built block. From my own experience and not going by HT hear-say, I can honestly say that I can't really notice much loss in low end spool or power having dropped 2 cr points.

So I don't really think you will feal a great deal of difference between 9:1 and 9:8, so I'll go 9:1 at least you get the extra safety margin.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 04:06 AM
  #11  
highboostb18c1's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Ibiza)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ibiza &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Just a suggestion. Ditch that VAFC before you build your motor. A good friend of mine destroyed a perfectly good built block (JE, Eagle) because of the overadvanced timing that the VAFC creates. After putting in a fresh B18, with stock internals, and switching to a standalone fuel management he has made in excess of 300 hp and ran a 12.1.</TD></TR></TABLE>

yeah going with hondata s200

i want to be able to run between 10-15 psi but not lose too much low end power.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 05:59 AM
  #12  
ek9turbo's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (highboostb18c1)

running 8.9:1 in my ls vtec, feels nice in low rpms, i dont think ull notice any difference


<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by highboostb18c1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
drag kit
</TD></TR></TABLE>

please dont say that
i made 296hp at 9psi with my drag kit
look at my signature at 20psi dropping to 18psi
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 07:43 AM
  #13  
JDM_Risa's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (ek9turbo)

9.8:1 c/r gsr block 60trim t3/t4 at 12psi...made 332whp i like the mild compression as long as you have a good tuner and a good fuel mangement i had a hondata s200......
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 08:03 AM
  #14  
BME1986's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, New York, USA
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (GunMETAL_TEgRa)

I agree ditch the afc. I will be getting uberdata once I am built.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 08:06 AM
  #15  
highboostb18c1's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (ek9turbo)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek9turbo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">running 8.9:1 in my ls vtec, feels nice in low rpms, i dont think ull notice any difference


please dont say that
i made 296hp at 9psi with my drag kit
look at my signature at 20psi dropping to 18psi</TD></TR></TABLE>

i'm not saying a drag kit is garbage, i just wish i listened to everyone and did a custom kit. i'm keeping the kit just getting a bigger turbo. t3/to4e 57 trim
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 08:08 AM
  #16  
highboostb18c1's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (highboostb18c1)

while i'm on the topic, whats everyone opinion on cp pistons? with eagle rods? and who makes the best block gaurd?
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 02:38 PM
  #17  
highboostb18c1's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (highboostb18c1)

Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 03:04 PM
  #18  
Killer_B's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Sunrise, FL
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (highboostb18c1)

&lt;&lt; daily driven for over 1 year. about 8.8:1 compression altho i know its lower. made 301 @ 9lbs with a basic T3/T4. stock sleeves. i run on 89 octane the majority of the time. i recently tried 87 octane altho i didn't go into boost often. i didn't hear nor feel any detonation.

at low rpms the car is fine. i chose low compression so that the Turbo does most of the work. i think its part of reason why my motor has lasted so long.

my next motor will have the same compression except that it will be sleeved.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 03:30 PM
  #19  
kleefton's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: queens village, ny, usa
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (Killer_B)

Yea this high compressin bandwagon is the biggest joke on honda-tech it seems.

Peeps keep mentioning how you'll make more power blah blah blah with lest boost blah blah blah...

Driving back to back 9.1 and 10.2 b16s I couldn't feel any difference.

I think the only thing you can guarantee by running higher compression is to kill your motor faster. Even if the tune is majorly conservative you WILL be more susceptible to knock than someone running lower comp. Weird and unpredictable things happen all the time, like a bad tank of gas, faulty fuel pump...to name a few.

Taking that in consideration why would you not want your motor to run on the lowest octane as possible, instead of having to run c16 every time you get on it?
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2004 | 01:35 AM
  #20  
1SlowSi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (ek9turbo)

Hey ek9turbo... was this all on pump gas? nice freakin numbers dude!
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2004 | 02:09 AM
  #21  
BadWay's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: OR, USA
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (highboostb18c1)

normal street turbo motors i build are 9.5-10:1. i have run 10.8:1 up to 16lbs on pump gas (92 octane) i have a buddy who dropped his compression on his b16 to 9:1 and it barely gets his del sol to start rolling, granted 21psi on pump gas is cool, but torque is more the issue than horsepower. i have big opinions on high compression turbo motors(honda) because i trust the combustion chamber design of the honda engines..i've tried it and i like it. i will say that actual spool rpms don't change much with compression but i did lose about 70 ft lbs of torque lowering compression from 10.8 to 9.0. it just moves the horsepower higher in the rpm range
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2004 | 03:00 AM
  #22  
1SlowSi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (BadWay)

Im gonna go with a 9.5:1 cr when i rebuild. Its right in the middle! haha. hopefully ill make some good number with that.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2004 | 08:18 AM
  #23  
accord387's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL, United States
Default

alcohol and whatever compression you want
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bseriescivic5
Forced Induction
14
Nov 24, 2006 12:26 PM
Aeka GSR
Forced Induction
8
Sep 26, 2003 09:25 AM
QCKGSR
Forced Induction
5
Jun 28, 2003 08:34 AM
meanteg
Forced Induction
3
Nov 23, 2001 10:30 AM
BLaCKWiDoWSi
Forced Induction
6
Nov 2, 2001 03:12 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:22 AM.