Notices

9.8:1 vs 9:1

Old 11-04-2004, 07:21 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
highboostb18c1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 9.8:1 vs 9:1

i need opinions and maybe even dyno charts if you have them, i want to build my motor and don't know what compression i should do. its a daily driver so i was thinking 9.8:1 would be fine, i want to be able to run more then 8 psi safely. at 7 psi with drag kit and stock internals w/ vafc i only made...


i know
drag kit
boost
Old 11-04-2004, 08:05 PM
  #2  
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (highboostb18c1)

You will be happier being able to run more boost with the lower compression on pump gas. 9.8:1 is all fine and dandy for people running mammoth turbos that will make 400-450 WHP at like 12-14 pounds of boost, but for a typical T3/TO4E guy 9:1 + more boost is the way to go.
Old 11-04-2004, 08:13 PM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
justagsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (Chip)

Just run 9:1 pistons with a cometic gasket and that will give you about 8.8:1 compression. You will be happy.
Old 11-04-2004, 08:24 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
mchuang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dirty 3rd, Tx, USA
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I say 9:8:1 because with tuning capabilities and equipment these days you should safely be able to.
Old 11-04-2004, 08:54 PM
  #5  
 
b16sedan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (mchuang)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mchuang &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I say 9:8:1 because with tuning capabilities and equipment these days you should safely be able to. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Who gives a **** if you can run 9.8:1 and boost when you can make more pump gas power with 9:1 and boost. I am running 7.8:1 compression on my B16, and after having driven this I can say that everyone's interpretation on honda-tech of the huge loss in power and throttle reponse and turbo spool is far far exaggerated.
Old 11-04-2004, 09:39 PM
  #6  
Member
 
.::Lee::.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Here in, Texas
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (b16coupe)

Just a suggestion. Ditch that VAFC before you build your motor. A good friend of mine destroyed a perfectly good built block (JE, Eagle) because of the overadvanced timing that the VAFC creates. After putting in a fresh B18, with stock internals, and switching to a standalone fuel management he has made in excess of 300 hp and ran a 12.1.
Old 11-04-2004, 09:48 PM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Irvine, CA, usa
Posts: 8,120
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: (Ibiza)

If you run pump gas, 9-1 max. Spooling speed is tied to exhaust size, not c/r.
Old 11-04-2004, 11:09 PM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
 
DRIVENRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im ruing 9.8.1... loving the low end power...
Old 11-05-2004, 12:48 AM
  #9  
Member
 
FOrSfEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: TurBlowVille, SC, USA
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (TurboHybridEG6)

I'm running 10.5.1 and I'm really loving it. IMP great for a daily driver.
Old 11-05-2004, 02:43 AM
  #10  
 
swlabhot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Planet BOOOST
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (FOrSfEd)

I ran 11:1 cr on stock block for about a year and now I've dropped it to 9:1 with built block. From my own experience and not going by HT hear-say, I can honestly say that I can't really notice much loss in low end spool or power having dropped 2 cr points.

So I don't really think you will feal a great deal of difference between 9:1 and 9:8, so I'll go 9:1 at least you get the extra safety margin.
Old 11-05-2004, 04:06 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
 
highboostb18c1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Ibiza)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ibiza &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Just a suggestion. Ditch that VAFC before you build your motor. A good friend of mine destroyed a perfectly good built block (JE, Eagle) because of the overadvanced timing that the VAFC creates. After putting in a fresh B18, with stock internals, and switching to a standalone fuel management he has made in excess of 300 hp and ran a 12.1.</TD></TR></TABLE>

yeah going with hondata s200

i want to be able to run between 10-15 psi but not lose too much low end power.
Old 11-05-2004, 05:59 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
ek9turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (highboostb18c1)

running 8.9:1 in my ls vtec, feels nice in low rpms, i dont think ull notice any difference


<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by highboostb18c1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
drag kit
</TD></TR></TABLE>

please dont say that
i made 296hp at 9psi with my drag kit
look at my signature at 20psi dropping to 18psi
Old 11-05-2004, 07:43 AM
  #13  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
JDM_Risa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Jose, CA, USA
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (ek9turbo)

9.8:1 c/r gsr block 60trim t3/t4 at 12psi...made 332whp i like the mild compression as long as you have a good tuner and a good fuel mangement i had a hondata s200......
Old 11-05-2004, 08:03 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
BME1986's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (GunMETAL_TEgRa)

I agree ditch the afc. I will be getting uberdata once I am built.
Old 11-05-2004, 08:06 AM
  #15  
Thread Starter
 
highboostb18c1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (ek9turbo)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek9turbo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">running 8.9:1 in my ls vtec, feels nice in low rpms, i dont think ull notice any difference


please dont say that
i made 296hp at 9psi with my drag kit
look at my signature at 20psi dropping to 18psi</TD></TR></TABLE>

i'm not saying a drag kit is garbage, i just wish i listened to everyone and did a custom kit. i'm keeping the kit just getting a bigger turbo. t3/to4e 57 trim
Old 11-05-2004, 08:08 AM
  #16  
Thread Starter
 
highboostb18c1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (highboostb18c1)

while i'm on the topic, whats everyone opinion on cp pistons? with eagle rods? and who makes the best block gaurd?
Old 11-05-2004, 02:38 PM
  #17  
Thread Starter
 
highboostb18c1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (highboostb18c1)

Old 11-05-2004, 03:04 PM
  #18  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Killer_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sunrise, FL
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (highboostb18c1)

&lt;&lt; daily driven for over 1 year. about 8.8:1 compression altho i know its lower. made 301 @ 9lbs with a basic T3/T4. stock sleeves. i run on 89 octane the majority of the time. i recently tried 87 octane altho i didn't go into boost often. i didn't hear nor feel any detonation.

at low rpms the car is fine. i chose low compression so that the Turbo does most of the work. i think its part of reason why my motor has lasted so long.

my next motor will have the same compression except that it will be sleeved.
Old 11-05-2004, 03:30 PM
  #19  
 
kleefton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: queens village, ny, usa
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (Killer_B)

Yea this high compressin bandwagon is the biggest joke on honda-tech it seems.

Peeps keep mentioning how you'll make more power blah blah blah with lest boost blah blah blah...

Driving back to back 9.1 and 10.2 b16s I couldn't feel any difference.

I think the only thing you can guarantee by running higher compression is to kill your motor faster. Even if the tune is majorly conservative you WILL be more susceptible to knock than someone running lower comp. Weird and unpredictable things happen all the time, like a bad tank of gas, faulty fuel pump...to name a few.

Taking that in consideration why would you not want your motor to run on the lowest octane as possible, instead of having to run c16 every time you get on it?
Old 11-07-2004, 01:35 AM
  #20  
Honda-Tech Member
 
1SlowSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (ek9turbo)

Hey ek9turbo... was this all on pump gas? nice freakin numbers dude!
Old 11-07-2004, 02:09 AM
  #21  
Honda-Tech Member
 
BadWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OR, USA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (highboostb18c1)

normal street turbo motors i build are 9.5-10:1. i have run 10.8:1 up to 16lbs on pump gas (92 octane) i have a buddy who dropped his compression on his b16 to 9:1 and it barely gets his del sol to start rolling, granted 21psi on pump gas is cool, but torque is more the issue than horsepower. i have big opinions on high compression turbo motors(honda) because i trust the combustion chamber design of the honda engines..i've tried it and i like it. i will say that actual spool rpms don't change much with compression but i did lose about 70 ft lbs of torque lowering compression from 10.8 to 9.0. it just moves the horsepower higher in the rpm range
Old 11-07-2004, 03:00 AM
  #22  
Honda-Tech Member
 
1SlowSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 9.8:1 vs 9:1 (BadWay)

Im gonna go with a 9.5:1 cr when i rebuild. Its right in the middle! haha. hopefully ill make some good number with that.
Old 11-07-2004, 08:18 AM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
accord387's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Orlando, FL, United States
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

alcohol and whatever compression you want
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bseriescivic5
Forced Induction
14
11-24-2006 12:26 PM
Aeka GSR
Forced Induction
8
09-26-2003 09:25 AM
QCKGSR
Forced Induction
5
06-28-2003 08:34 AM
meanteg
Forced Induction
3
11-23-2001 10:30 AM
BLaCKWiDoWSi
Forced Induction
6
11-02-2001 03:12 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 9.8:1 vs 9:1



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:44 PM.