Motor compression: High or low for boost???????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 08:40 PM
  #1  
Bseriescivic5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 0
From: Mid atlantic
Default Motor compression: High or low for boost???????

Ok guys I really want to know who is right in this topic:

Booosh wrote:
after seeing this,

why run 9:1 cr when you could run say 9:5.1 or 9:8.1 ...still lowering compression, but

you can make the same power as 9:1 w/ lower boost on a higher compression motor.

just for an example: (not real)

9:1 @18psi 400whp
9:8.1 @18psi 450whp...

make sense or am i missing something...

so on the 9:8.1 you could run 16psi...having it spool faster...and still get to your 400whp mark

so what im asking is...

WHY DOES EVERYONE GO 9:1 , how come you RARELY see a higher cr motor built ?


You're missing something because the power difference isn't going to be nearly as massive as you're tryin to illustrate. The difference between 9.0:1 and 9.8:1 might be made up with a half of a pound of extra boost, not 2 or more psi. The 9.0:1 motor provides you with a much larger safety net when you're running pump gas, so it makes sense to run a slightly lower compresion ratio for safety. Trying to make power using the engine's compression is silly when you can do it with the turbocharger and have a motor that is less likely to detonate on pump gas at any given power level.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 08:42 AM
  #2  
Bseriescivic5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 0
From: Mid atlantic
Default

bump need answer
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 02:53 PM
  #3  
JDogg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,072
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
Default Re: (Bseriescivic5)

do a search, this has been beaten to death, pump gas = as low as you can get the compression, race gas... compression needs to be chosen with your specific power goals/turbo setup in mind.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #4  
B18 CYA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 0
From: Nowhere, in, Canada
Default

Lower compression leaves you more room for error. A car on pump gas with 9:1 pistons, running 18lbs of boost making 400whp will have a lesser chance to detonate than a car with 9.8:1 running the same amount of boost and almost the same power level.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 07:41 PM
  #5  
Bseriescivic5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 0
From: Mid atlantic
Default

See i did search it, and im not sure i agree with it. I know you have more room for error with low compression, but i thought u could make alot more power with a highercompression motor on boost
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 07:45 PM
  #6  
JDMTurboEG6's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Bseriescivic5)

basically a motor thats running 9:1 comp is generally going to be more reliable and easier on the wallet than a motor running 9.8:1 comp
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 08:06 PM
  #7  
Bseriescivic5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 0
From: Mid atlantic
Default

well mine is running 10:6:1.....hehehe and its gonna see 15+psi
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 08:50 PM
  #8  
BoostedJeff's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 38,620
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default Re: (Bseriescivic5)

im running 10.2:1 compression and plan on running 35psi or more in the future

Its all in the tuning.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 09:16 PM
  #9  
Bseriescivic5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 0
From: Mid atlantic
Default

I agree, my setup will be tuned by jeff evans. However my car is a street car so thats the only thing im worried about (daily driver)
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 07:33 AM
  #10  
nasteboyii's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,665
Likes: 0
From: felton, de, usa
Default Re: (Bseriescivic5)

Your a silly boy

Basically these guys have hit it right on the head, SAFER WINDOW, in other words lower compression has more chance for error in tuning or fuel quality, were higher compression does not, along with the higher compression engine can get away with a smaller turbo like a .48 .63 like someone we know did,

TUNING TUNING TUNING is always the key
and ur not going to run 400 hp every day on the street not to mention u not goin to make the power on PUMP gas

d
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 08:07 AM
  #11  
Bseriescivic5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 0
From: Mid atlantic
Default

I understand. so basically long story short, a low compression motor needs to be supplemented by lots of air from the turbo, whereas a high compression motor doesnt need as much boost to make the same power at a given boost level
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 09:01 AM
  #12  
adseguy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,992
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN, U.S.A
Default Re: (Bseriescivic5)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bseriescivic5 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I understand. so basically long story short, a low compression motor needs to be supplemented by lots of air from the turbo, whereas a high compression motor doesnt need as much boost to make the same power at a given boost level</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yep, because the high compression engine is more efficient then the lower compession. Jeff Evans did a dyno comparrison of an engine with 9.0:1 compression then changed it to a 10.0:1 he saw about (I think if I remember correctly) 10-20whp difference on a 300whp motor. It's not that much of a gain, you'd be better off making the head flow better at high RPMs ie:cams, severe porting, and all that good stuff.

I would have thought that race cars use high compression (at least in the honda worls), but I just learned that Tony1's 9second car is using 9.0:1......just food for thought .
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 10:02 AM
  #13  
Bseriescivic5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 0
From: Mid atlantic
Default

yeah makes sense. But on a side note, my builder (nasteboyii) decided to go with 10.6:1 primarilly becuase we wernt sure when it would be ready for the turbokit and its going to be a daily driver, so even without boost it will still have good power to get around. And again when it does see boost it will be tuned properly, and be making about 275wheel on the street daily driven.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 12:18 PM
  #14  
nasteboyii's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,665
Likes: 0
From: felton, de, usa
Default Re: (Bseriescivic5)

and because i have NO FEAR

this guy cant stay outta the pedal, so a small turbo on small boost will be plenty

d
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 12:26 PM
  #15  
Bseriescivic5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 0
From: Mid atlantic
Default

Lol thats not true............I let out when im ahead......hehehehe
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
capmcatastrophy
Forced Induction
102
Jun 2, 2010 07:06 PM
peakboosth22
Forced Induction
4
Jun 20, 2006 08:55 AM
1SIKCRX
Forced Induction
13
Oct 13, 2003 10:04 PM
rb08
Forced Induction
14
Aug 26, 2003 07:52 AM
philo
Forced Induction
47
Nov 29, 2002 11:31 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:58 PM.