Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack Road Racing / AUTOX, HPDE, Time Attack

turbo, or not, for road course.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2006, 10:53 AM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
kb58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default turbo, or not, for road course.

The following is only my preception, I've never driven a turbo car on a road course.

If there are two identical cars, both with, oh, 220hp, and lets say identical weight. One makes it via NA, the other with a low pressure turbo. And before the arguing starts, lets say our two fictional cars are equally reliable. Oh and both have the same driver.

Okay, take both out on a road couse and run 50 laps... who has the faster lap time at the end of the day?

My gut says the NA will, due to (my perception) of better throttle control. When I'm mid-corner, in a slight four-wheel drift, throttle control is extremely important. Pushing on the gas pedal for >.< this much more power, will move the back end out >.< this much (in my RWD Mini.) But if two seconds later (as the turbo spins up) I get >...< this much more, the back end's going to come around on me. Having what amounts to a rubber band between the gas pedal and engine isn't a good thing on a road course, where fast lap times = riding the edge of adhesion.

Alright, that's my take on it, but I admit I just don't know. Who here has done trackdays in their turbo car? How did it handle mid-corner?
Old 11-23-2006, 11:04 AM
  #2  
Member
 
Todd Reid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Elkton, MD, 21921
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: turbo, or not, for road course. (kb58)

hi kb!

you only forgot one thing; thats TORQUE. the low pressure turbo is gonna have a TON of torque at low rpms. gonna rip that car out of the corners and onto the straights.

turbo car will be quicker around the course, i think, given that it has sufficient traction, and good reliability as stated above.

later

PS i have a nice 2003 EVO that i street drive, and that thing has tons of tq that comes on between 3k and 3.5k. and its a mostly stock 2 liter engine!!!!
Old 11-23-2006, 11:15 AM
  #3  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
kb58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: turbo, or not, for road course. (Todd Reid)

I understand, but my concern is mid-corner, where, when you push the gas pedal just a little, two seconds later this ton of torque turns the wheels to smoke and puts you off the road. It's that delay I'm concerned about.

I have a suspicion that turbo drivers actually go around corners slower than NA cars, to stay away from that "torque rush." They then make up what they lost in the straights... just my impression though.
Old 11-23-2006, 11:28 AM
  #4  
Member
 
Todd Reid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Elkton, MD, 21921
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: turbo, or not, for road course. (kb58)

hi again.

i had the EVO out for "fun" for 4 track days in the last two years. i never dropped below about 4k rpm out there. didn't really experience any lag. very very easy to drive. very easy.

of course, that car is awd.

but, i believe, given a couple days to get used to it, that i could drive a fwd, properly set up turbo car really fast. just would take some good, smooth driving....

Old 11-23-2006, 03:08 PM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
 
clemsonhatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: turbo, or not, for road course. (Todd Reid)

Twin-charge FTW! Lots of torque with no lag
Old 11-23-2006, 09:03 PM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Weston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CO, USA
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The turbo will have more torque and a fatter powerband. It can also help make up some of the difference when additional load is placed on the engine (ie up hills, shifting short, etc). So, with the same peak HP and torque numbers, I would put my money on the turbo engine, assuming it's properly cooled (turbo heat soak sucks). As for throttle control, it's definately different from NA and is a skill that you'll have to learn, but it is quite controllable.

As I approach corner exit, I just give it a lot of gas to get the turbo going, and then immediately ease back on the throttle <u>before</u> the power hits. The key is anticipation, because if you just keep your foot in it and let it come, it's a pretty frustrating experience to try to modulate it, since it's very non-linear and on a slight delay too. It takes practice to get the timing and amount of throttle right, but it works really well and has become second nature for me. And this is with a small turbo that spools up really fast, which is harder to control, but awesome when you get it right. Some people left-foot brake to keep their turbo spooled up, but I find that I really don't need the extra heat in the brakes or the turbo.
Old 11-24-2006, 06:29 AM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
rmcdaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: (Weston)

Weston, can you post a pic of your torque curve? I pretty much had to do this
:

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kb58 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I have a suspicion that turbo drivers actually go around corners slower than NA cars, to stay away from that "torque rush." They then make up what they lost in the straights... just my impression though.</TD></TR></TABLE>

But my setup had an insane torque ramp:




I've talked to Cody Loveland, and his turbo setup seemed very good for the track:



But his setup was just 7 PSI from a big turbo (GT35R), where mine was 20+ PSI from a GT28RS.
Old 11-24-2006, 03:11 PM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
 
EMod Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Findlay, Oh, USA
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (rmcdaniels)

When I was running a turbo on my Civic in Street Mod, I spent a lot of time working on the drivability, particularly the mid-corner part throttle aspects. With the turbo making 12psi, the car was very difficult to drive in corners - throttle response just wasn't linear. At 5-6psi it drove like an N/A motor. My solution was a simple two stage boost controller with a switch located below the throttle pedal. At part throttle, it opened the wastegate completely, resulting in around 5psi and good drivability. At full throttle with the switch engaged, it jumped up to 12psi and made crazy torque.

-Chris
Old 11-24-2006, 03:49 PM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
 
STN_Pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: (EMod Civic)

This must be sweet...
Old 11-25-2006, 10:17 AM
  #10  
Honda-Tech Member
 
coneheadsracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Right Here, MI, world
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (STN_Pat)

I realize rwd is different the fwd. First, a couple seconds of throttle, even full throttle which is more to make the turbo spool, wouldn't make much boost, unless your running a really small turbo. I have a single cam turbo in a hatch, 15 psi. I ran it at gratton three times this summer, and once at gingerman. I never had any problems with mid corner traction, that was on street tires. I have a .48 / .60 which is a fairly large turbo for that engine. You learn very quickly how to modulate your throttle and get out of a corner in a hurry. As for controling your drift, i don't see that being an issue, i just don't think your going to hit much boost, plus look at all the proffessional drifters, there all turbo'd. I say boost it, you will definelty be quicker out of the corner, then the NA car in your example, and in my opinion, you should have equal corner speeds.
Old 11-25-2006, 10:33 AM
  #11  
New User
 
WWDTrackRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SoCali, CA, USA
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: turbo, or not, for road course. (kb58)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kb58 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I understand, but my concern is mid-corner, where, when you push the gas pedal just a little, two seconds later this ton of torque turns the wheels to smoke and puts you off the road. It's that delay I'm concerned about.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Well turbo selection is going to determine its behavior. I think you can choose a broad range turbo and be very happy. If you pick a peaky turbo, you'll probably experience a lot of the issues you're worried about.

I never thought my MR2 Turbo was a handful because of the turbo mid corner. Of course, I never put on a peaky 400hp turbo.

Any car with big gobs of torque on tap will be a handful, turbo (lag) or not.
Old 11-25-2006, 11:59 AM
  #12  
Def
Honda-Tech Member
 
Def's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: turbo, or not, for road course. (WWDTrackRacer)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by WWDTrackRacer &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Any car with big gobs of torque on tap will be a handful, turbo (lag) or not.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Completely agree.

You guys are comparing low torque motors to high torque motors. If you aren't used to fine throttle control, then no matter how you get your power will be a problem. A very laggy turbo setup is another issue entirely, but looking at stuff like P2 prototypes in ALMS or late 80's F1 cars(that had pretty much no driver aids from our perspective), they obviously have a large amount of lag and seem to drive around just fine.

A moderately sized turbo making ~250-300whp on a ~1.8L engine is more than tractable enough from a lag standpoint, and only makes enough torque to a problem for those that just like to blindly stab the throttle.
Old 11-25-2006, 09:09 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
turboteener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: AL
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was talking to a CART driver a couple of years ago about this. I ask him to compare driving a turbo car and an NA car. He said he could go just as fast with either car, he just had to "plan for the boost". His driving style was adjusted for the turbo.

Since most of my driving is oriented towards road racing having a laggy turbo setup is not my idea of a fast car. I am running a small T3 right now and find that it is just fast everywhere. It pulls like a freight train at any point. I can go hard into a corner and modulate the throttle to drive through it. I can feel the boost fall off when I easy out of the gas mid turn, but it seems to come back on when I need it. When I roll back into the throttle on corner exit, I am usually at enough RPM boost comes back on in a pretty linear fashion.

I wouldn't have a 220hp turbo motor, if you have the turbo use it to generate an even 300. That is a reliable drivable setup that spools quickly.
Old 11-26-2006, 11:35 PM
  #14  
Honda-Tech Member
 
slammed_93_hatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: cali
Posts: 13,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (turboteener)

honestly are you ever going to be below 4 thousand rpms ???


Thats one thing to think about on a road course you are always in the high rpms, i relize you do have a h22 so it doesn't rev that much, but it still revs.
Old 11-27-2006, 12:48 AM
  #15  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Outrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rancho Relacso, CA, USA
Posts: 9,648
Likes: 0
Received 88 Likes on 75 Posts
Default Re: (slammed_93_hatch)

I remember something about Champ Car drivers having to adjust their style to anticipate the turbo "coming on".

Parker Johnstone (former Honda Champ Car driver and Champ Car commentator) explained that even though Champ Cars have sequential shifters, the drivers would still blip the throttle during downshifts. Racers don't do this in normally aspirated race cars with sequential trannies. But in a Champ Car, the blip of the throttle is used to keep the turbo's RPM from dropping too low.

I've always wondered how a D16Z6 Civic with a Jackson Racing Super Charger would compare to another Civic with a GReddy turbocharger in terms of laptime and ontrack behaviour (all else being equal).
Old 11-27-2006, 07:15 AM
  #16  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Bakeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I do auto-x, some events sponsored by an Austin-Healey group that sets up the course extremely tight. I also do some road course events. I'm running 14psi out of a t3/t04e on a d16z6. Mid corner is no problem. All you have to watch is throttle. Obviously it takes a few seconds to spool up 14psi. With small amounts of throttle you will only build 1-2 psi. Heck, you can get that with ITBs and a scoop at the right speed.
Now, adding in an LSD and traction bars tamed my car down a lot and made it gobs more predictable. But I have no problem in my del sol mid corner. It's smooth and predictable as long as you're not driving like a throttle happy 16 year old.
Again, properly sorted suspension will make or break any car mid corner. An LSD can certainly tame it as well. But really, that will affect any car.
I guess my point is that once you are truly driving the car, it doesn't matter if it's turbo or NA. It will respond to your inputs and you will have to adjust to the cars output. I know that I need to tip in on the throttle a hair earlier if I was off the gas and need to get back into it exiting a corner. Adjust and there will be no problems.
Old 11-27-2006, 07:27 AM
  #17  
Honda-Tech Member
 
nonsense's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: turbo, or not, for road course. (kb58)

What about option #3, Jackson Racing Supercharger? No turbo lag, always has boost. Less under-hood (uh rear engine compartment) temps.

Old 11-27-2006, 08:30 AM
  #18  
Rainman
 
SIred91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kills, Utah
Posts: 6,979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Outrun)

The SC'd car would crush the Turbo'd car, all other things equal......
Old 11-27-2006, 09:03 AM
  #19  
Member
 
RacerXI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dothan, AL
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (SIred91)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SIred91 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The SC'd car would crush the Turbo'd car, all other things equal......</TD></TR></TABLE>
That is absolutely incorrect.
Old 11-27-2006, 03:06 PM
  #20  
Honda-Tech Member
 
rmcdaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: turbo, or not, for road course. (nonsense)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nonsense &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What about option #3, Jackson Racing Supercharger? No turbo lag, always has boost. Less under-hood (uh rear engine compartment) temps.

</TD></TR></TABLE>


I'll post how my SC setup turns out, the pistons just came in last week and it should all be going together in the next month or so. 300+ WHP in an EG hatch with a flat torque curve should be interesting at the track.
Old 11-28-2006, 05:15 PM
  #21  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Weston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CO, USA
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (SIred91)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SIred91 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The SC'd car would crush the Turbo'd car, all other things equal......</TD></TR></TABLE>

Nope... not even close, especially when it's a JRSC.
Old 11-28-2006, 05:19 PM
  #22  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Weston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CO, USA
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (rmcdaniels)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Weston, can you post a pic of your torque curve?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Here is a somewhat old dyno, with the VAFC setup on 9 psi... it's a little fatter with slightly higher numbers now, but the shape is mostly the same.

Old 11-28-2006, 07:31 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
turboteener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: AL
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'll be happy to put my turbocharged street car against a similar supercharged street car on the track. I will drive both cars to rule out driver differences or we can find someone that will do it for us.

I thoroughly believe I will walk all of any supercharged car.
Old 11-28-2006, 07:56 PM
  #24  
Honda-Tech Member
 
rmcdaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: (turboteener)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turboteener &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'll be happy to put my turbocharged street car against a similar supercharged street car on the track. I will drive both cars to rule out driver differences or we can find someone that will do it for us.

I thoroughly believe I will walk all of any supercharged car.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Come to Road Atlanta for the BMW CCA event next year, I'll bring my JRSC'd Civic and we can compare lap times.
Old 11-29-2006, 05:14 AM
  #25  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
kb58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (rmcdaniels)

That would be a good comparision, but only if they have the same boost, tires, shocks, springs.... etc.


Quick Reply: turbo, or not, for road course.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:35 AM.