skateboard_ej8

iTrader: (4)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EG2_KING &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">check to see if u still have your ecu its probably not there sounds dumb but just check </TD></TR></TABLE>

Are u implying someone stole her ecu?

mustang5.slow

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by esco562 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Are u implying someone stole her ecu?</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah it could happen with ex p28's

HellerDopeEK4

1st thing 1st check your battery voltages... and the water in it, non fill it up...don't expletive with ur dizzy first , could just be your battery or sps

forcefedferio

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Syndacate &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You mean other than at least 2/4 pistons ***-raping your valves?</TD></TR></TABLE>

hey, just for the record you failed to reduce that fraction...it would be 1/2 of your pistons *** raping your valves, not 2/4.

haha

dallas306

So i replaced the ingnition coil in the dizzy but it still won't start. I now have a good spark but it wont start, whats the deal??

instructor74

did youu put the plug wires on in the correct firing order?

Edit firing order 1,3,4,2 on the distributor from driverside to pass on engine 1,2,3,4

dividedas1

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by instructor74 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">did youu put the plug wires on in the correct firing order?

Edit firing order 1,3,4,2 on the distributor from driverside to pass on engine 1,2,3,4</TD></TR></TABLE>
hopefully he didnt even take the wires off the distributor cap. There really isnt a need to. What i would do now is test the starter. If you have fuel and spark the car should start. Could of possibly been two issues at once

dallas306

can you explain the plug order to me

draw a diagram or something please

Hittnthebz

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by forcefedferio &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

hey, just for the record you failed to reduce that fraction...it would be 1/2 of your pistons *** raping your valves, not 2/4.

haha </TD></TR></TABLE>
Im sure it wasnt meant to be a fraction. I think he means the fact that the crank spins the #1 and #4 pistons in sync and the #2 and #3 pistons in sync with each other. This means that theoretically either two or four cylinders will be affected depending on the possibility that the cam(s) open the valves up at just the right time for the piston to make contact. Thus comes the 2/4 "fraction".

forcefedferio

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hittnthebz &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Im sure it wasnt meant to be a fraction. I think he means the fact that the crank spins the #1 and #4 pistons in sync and the #2 and #3 pistons in sync with each other. This means that theoretically either two or four cylinders will be affected depending on the possibility that the cam(s) open the valves up at just the right time for the piston to make contact. Thus comes the 2/4 "fraction".</TD></TR></TABLE>

dude, it was a joke....BTW if an engine was spinning fast enough when said raping occured it would most likely be ALL of pistons *** raping your valves which would make that a whole number (1) or if you'd be more comfortable...4/4's