silvervtecrx

got a 2000 si nd i ran a 15.005
only got aem cai...

wats ur guy's best time....

Si Erik

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by silvervtecrx &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">got a 2000 si nd i ran a 15.005
only got aem cai...

wats ur guy's best time....</TD></TR></TABLE>


damn, what was your 60'?

My 99 Si with I/H/E and a 2.4 60' ran a 15.6 at 88.8

PRcivicHB

Thats hella fast for a 6th gen Si... You must be one hell of a driver....

edit: shyt thats GSR territory now that i think of it...

SiKid86

according to magazines and reviews i have read about our car's they are supposed to be a 15.6-15.7 second car.. Maybe some internal work you don't know about? But that is a nice time... I know some one who went out and bought a 01 gt stang, he thought it was stock. WHen he went to the track he ran a 13.8 and when down the first part sideways (they actually kicked him out because he either needed a helmet or a rollcage can't remember).. Tell me thats stock heh. Any how good run! I havn't brought my car to the track yet. but with what I have done i'd say its a 15.2ish right now it'll pretty much keep up with my friends 14.8 sec car.

silvervtecrx

my time slip is a little hazzy but i think its about 2.23

dohcbag

must be a short track for you to run a 15

oh wait you werent racing. you were doing drag

egOt

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by juanpwnz &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">must be a short track for you to run a 15

oh wait you werent racing. you were doing drag</TD></TR></TABLE>

Omg what a gayass remark. Drag racing is still racing, end of story. Btw, to the creator of this thread, do you gotta timeslip? I'm not callin bs, but a 15.005 for a 99-00 si with intake is hella good.

8krdline

i've seen a SI with intake and exhaust go 15.1, so 15.0 is possible with the right driver

Hybrid96EK

My best time was 15.1 with only intake and header. Did 15.5 with only intake, and 15.7 100% with less then 1,000 miles on the clock.

silvervtecrx

yeah i got a time slip...
ma fault i actually got wrong times

reaction .77
60 2.23
1/4 15.052@ 91.64

civtegra_hybrid

yeah its rare but 1 out of like 1000 cars made comes perfectly balanced, and thus, you have a quicker then norm. si. it's rare. cuz I know for a fact that there no way a stock SI (from the dealer) can run a 15.5 lol even with a pro driver. and an intake doesn't help alot either. check your piping, and your TB. for mods. that could be the way you ran that time..

hondaeg8

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SiKid86 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">according to magazines and reviews i have read about our car's they are supposed to be a 15.6-15.7 second car.. Maybe some internal work you don't know about? But that is a nice time... I know some one who went out and bought a 01 gt stang, he thought it was stock. WHen he went to the track he ran a 13.8 and when down the first part sideways (they actually kicked him out because he either needed a helmet or a rollcage can't remember).. Tell me thats stock heh. Any how good run! I havn't brought my car to the track yet. but with what I have done i'd say its a 15.2ish right now it'll pretty much keep up with my friends 14.8 sec car.</TD></TR></TABLE>

99+ GT stangs 5 speed are not notorious for going 13's all stock. its been done serveral times. my friend with a 00 GT automatic went 14.1 stock.

i have a 00 GT also...never took it to the track though

gezer

if it looks like ****, smells like **** then it must be ****......... excatly what i think about that 15.00 flat run on a stock motor and iam guessing with full interior as well..... until i see the time slips iam gonna have to say i highly doubt that a 99-00 si u hitting 15 flat is possible, timeslip plzzz

LOOKALIKe_eh2

yeah right u ran 15.00 with a stock si motor and full interior........... timeslip's, cause anyone can clame **** but until i see the timeslip then ur **** out of luck

00Red_SiR

ya that's faster than that car should have gone with only an intake on it for sure. Mine ran 15.7 stock, 15.4 with I/H/E, I had 60 foot times in the 2.4-2.5 range....most MPH was 89-90 mph too, your's would suggest that car has something more done to it with a slightly higher trap speed.

pearlcfcivic97

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gezer &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">if it looks like ****, smells like **** then it must be ****......... excatly what i think about that 15.00 flat run on a stock motor and iam guessing with full interior as well..... until i see the time slips iam gonna have to say i highly doubt that a 99-00 si u hitting 15 flat is possible, timeslip plzzz </TD></TR></TABLE>

maybe, just maybe some can drive better than you, maybe its possible that ordinary people can actualy drive better than a proffessional driver...there are some people that have a pecular talent at one thing or another, and maybe they just didnt have the same opportunity as the say proffessional driver did when they got the "proffessional" status. ive seen some pretty impressive driving from just people that i know of and know what they have i knew a guy that had a 00 ebp si and he ran a 14.9 with just and intake and cat back, some of you guys think your the best at driving when you have no idea how much better other people may in fact be at driveing...haters

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LOOKALIKe_eh2 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah right u ran 15.00 with a stock si motor and full interior........... timeslip's, cause anyone can clame **** but until i see the timeslip then ur **** out of luck</TD></TR></TABLE>

well hmmm anyone can clame ****, well i would seem to think that most people on this site know at least one person with a fast car and if they wanted to prolly could attain a timeslip and easily post it up here and most of you still wouldnt believe him....

Powered by Honda

damn, if you're telling the truth, that's a pretty fast Si.

cappa

Who does he have to prove it to? You are nobody and what you think doesnt matter. The poor kid is just asking what everyone elses times are, not for your non-professional opinion. Someone else was right there on the times with him anyways like .2 off his so its not impossible and Im sure the car was used so who know what else could have been done.

Powered by Honda

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cappa &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Who does he have to prove it to? You are nobody and what you think doesnt matter. The poor kid is just asking what everyone elses times are, not for your non-professional opinion. Someone else was right there on the times with him anyways like .2 off his so its not impossible and Im sure the car was used so who know what else could have been done.</TD></TR></TABLE>
what in the world are you babbling on about?

pearlcfcivic97

you dont have to validate yourself to anyone on honda-tech you have no idea who you are talking to...half the time i feel like 1/3 of the people on here are just 14 yr olds trying to feel important by telling other people that there full of ****...anyways nice car i wanted an si when i was like 17 dont anymore but there still cool

cappa

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Powered by Honda &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
what in the world are you babbling on about? </TD></TR></TABLE>
I wasnt talking about you I was just saying to LOOKALIKe_eh2 and gezer that he was only asking what everyone else ran. I was just sticking up for the kid. **** I know for a fact my civic couldnt even come close to that time. I have a p.o.s. ex with a extra 600 lbs of system in the trunk.

bluemax189

alright my 00ex with intake, exhaust and 55 shot ran 15.3 on half a bottle of nitrous. lets see your SI give me a run for my money. si's are definately not that fast stock

siblueg

i belive him yo, i don't know why but i believe him.
Just one, question what tires

dwchkypmp20

for all we know he could have been slicked up?

del_sol_tuner

I don't believe him ether. I have a del sol with a b16 engine, and the fastest I could get when I only had an Iceman intake was 15.3. And that was with good driving, with bad/slow launches I was running 15.5 - 15.6!