99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (stock)..
10-02-2004, 06:18 AM
#27
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (del_sol_tuner)
15.4 when I had my black si...
and all the rest of you guys don't know ****! his si could be electric blue for all you know. That right there knocks .4 sec off ur time.
and all the rest of you guys don't know ****! his si could be electric blue for all you know. That right there knocks .4 sec off ur time.
10-02-2004, 06:33 AM
#28
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 2.5 bar and corn, OH
Posts: 3,205
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (bluemax189)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bluemax189 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">alright my 00ex with intake, exhaust and 55 shot ran 15.3 on half a bottle of nitrous. lets see your SI give me a run for my money. si's are definately not that fast stock</TD></TR></TABLE>
you should deffenatly get a cam to help you out cause damn and get a header too. with a 55 shot i would expect 14's.
just my .02
you should deffenatly get a cam to help you out cause damn and get a header too. with a 55 shot i would expect 14's.
just my .02
10-02-2004, 06:59 AM
#29
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: On a constant bulk
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (robbieshonda)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bluemax189 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">alright my 00ex with intake, exhaust and 55 shot ran 15.3 on half a bottle of nitrous. lets see your SI give me a run for my money. si's are definately not that fast stock</TD></TR></TABLE>
You sir have a slow car...
You sir have a slow car...
10-02-2004, 07:16 AM
#30
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (gezer)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gezer »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">if it looks like ****, smells like **** then it must be ****......... excatly what i think about that 15.00 flat run on a stock motor and iam guessing with full interior as well..... until i see the time slips iam gonna have to say 
i highly doubt that a 99-00 si u hitting 15 flat is possible, timeslip plzzz </TD></TR></TABLE>
Doubt it all you want. I have people who witnessed the times and on top of that I backed it up with several runs. It IS possible if you know how to drive. Get over yourself.
i highly doubt that a 99-00 si u hitting 15 flat is possible, timeslip plzzz </TD></TR></TABLE>Doubt it all you want. I have people who witnessed the times and on top of that I backed it up with several runs. It IS possible if you know how to drive. Get over yourself.
10-02-2004, 07:18 AM
#31
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (00Red_SiR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 00Red_SiR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ya that's faster than that car should have gone with only an intake on it for sure. Mine ran 15.7 stock, 15.4 with I/H/E, I had 60 foot times in the 2.4-2.5 range....most MPH was 89-90 mph too, your's would suggest that car has something more done to it with a slightly higher trap speed.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I am sorry if you cannot drive. There is no reason that an Si with I/H/E should not be able to cut high 14's with a good driver. The times you are getting are only 1 tenth quicker then what I ran with only intake, think about it. And yes, all my times were done on the stock tires, no weight reduction, full interior.
I am sorry if you cannot drive. There is no reason that an Si with I/H/E should not be able to cut high 14's with a good driver. The times you are getting are only 1 tenth quicker then what I ran with only intake, think about it. And yes, all my times were done on the stock tires, no weight reduction, full interior.
10-02-2004, 07:20 AM
#32
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (bluemax189)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bluemax189 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">alright my 00ex with intake, exhaust and 55 shot ran 15.3 on half a bottle of nitrous. lets see your SI give me a run for my money. si's are definately not that fast stock</TD></TR></TABLE>
You ran a 15.3 WITH Nitrous and are comming in here swinging your dick. Please. Your car is slow as hell even with the bottle, so why would you be trying to challenge someone? Si's can run good times with good drivers. Thats all there is to it. Get over it.
You ran a 15.3 WITH Nitrous and are comming in here swinging your dick. Please. Your car is slow as hell even with the bottle, so why would you be trying to challenge someone? Si's can run good times with good drivers. Thats all there is to it. Get over it.
10-02-2004, 07:22 AM
#33
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (del_sol_tuner)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by del_sol_tuner »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I don't believe him ether. I have a del sol with a b16 engine, and the fastest I could get when I only had an Iceman intake was 15.3. And that was with good driving, with bad/slow launches I was running 15.5 - 15.6! 
</TD></TR></TABLE>
So wait a minute. You ran a whopping .2 slower then I run with a stock Si in your pig of a Del Sol and somehow my times (and the other guys) are bullshit? I fail to see the logic here.
</TD></TR></TABLE>So wait a minute. You ran a whopping .2 slower then I run with a stock Si in your pig of a Del Sol and somehow my times (and the other guys) are bullshit? I fail to see the logic here.
10-02-2004, 08:38 AM
#34
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Racine, WI, USA
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah how bout you put a 55 shot on your si and see what time you run...people that spray there stock cars and then want to think there big **** **** me off, go back to the fast and the furious.......
10-02-2004, 09:41 AM
#35
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (PLANBmotorsports)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by PLANBmotorsports »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">15.4 when I had my black si...
and all the rest of you guys don't know ****! his si could be electric blue for all you know. That right there knocks .4 sec off ur time.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
your ****** corny... and to the guy that ran a 15.3 on the bottle, give it to me and ill make better use of it
and all the rest of you guys don't know ****! his si could be electric blue for all you know. That right there knocks .4 sec off ur time.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
your ****** corny... and to the guy that ran a 15.3 on the bottle, give it to me and ill make better use of it
10-02-2004, 10:07 AM
#37
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 17,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (YOUR MAMA)
I'm going to have to show this thread to a friend, we went to the track with his 99 si with just an N1 and he ran a 15.8 and said that was horrible and that he didn't understand how my 93 SI was quicker(Just I/H/E).
10-02-2004, 10:22 AM
#38
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: socal, CA, USA
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (Hybrid93Eg)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hybrid93Eg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
You ran a 15.3 WITH Nitrous and are comming in here swinging your dick. Please. Your car is slow as hell even with the bottle, so why would you be trying to challenge someone? Si's can run good times with good drivers. Thats all there is to it. Get over it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
What now? Just because he had NITROUS, hes supposed to be hella fast? We're talking about a stock d16y8 here with only I/E in a heavyass 2000 ej coupe. Those bone stock are supposed to hit 16.7, so honestly, a 15.3 ain't too bad when you consider the other factors. With some better tires and a little practice that guy would be in the high 14's.
You ran a 15.3 WITH Nitrous and are comming in here swinging your dick. Please. Your car is slow as hell even with the bottle, so why would you be trying to challenge someone? Si's can run good times with good drivers. Thats all there is to it. Get over it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
What now? Just because he had NITROUS, hes supposed to be hella fast? We're talking about a stock d16y8 here with only I/E in a heavyass 2000 ej coupe. Those bone stock are supposed to hit 16.7, so honestly, a 15.3 ain't too bad when you consider the other factors. With some better tires and a little practice that guy would be in the high 14's.
10-02-2004, 10:38 AM
#39
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mobile, Al, United States
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (egOt)
Actually they run 16.4 stock (not trying to start any trouble) but that is a slow time...my old 98 ex with cai, header, axle back with gude cam went 15.4 on street tires...though that was with a 2.1 60'........supercharged at 10psi went 13.9 with 2.0 60' on 16" te37 and advan a032....so a 15.3 on the gas is a lil slow but to agree with you a lil practice goes a long way...I see guys at the track drop there times .5 second within 5-6 runs
10-02-2004, 11:41 AM
#40
Member
all this "i can drive" bullshit has got to stop.
the only thing that makes someone a better driver in drag racing than another person is launching, which is evident by 60' times. there's no magical technicque to shifting a ******* car at the red line that makes it somehow faster than it should be.
the only thing that makes someone a better driver in drag racing than another person is launching, which is evident by 60' times. there's no magical technicque to shifting a ******* car at the red line that makes it somehow faster than it should be.
10-02-2004, 11:48 AM
#41
All Motor Mentor
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 902, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,987
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (Hybrid93Eg)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hybrid93Eg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I am sorry if you cannot drive. There is no reason that an Si with I/H/E should not be able to cut high 14's with a good driver. The times you are getting are only 1 tenth quicker then what I ran with only intake, think about it. And yes, all my times were done on the stock tires, no weight reduction, full interior. </TD></TR></TABLE>
it seems you have an opinion on everything don't you.... First off, I can drive...which is why I posted my 60' times so people could see that traction was an issue in my times. Second, I should have clarified that I didn't actually have a true exhaust on my car at that time, it was only an axle back. Factor those 2 things in and I could have hit a high 14 quarter. The point I made in my post was his ending MPH which was 91+ mph, something that indicates the overall power an engine is making. Good driving will get you down the strip with a faster time but only more HP will give you a higher MPH. A relatively stock Si (maybe with a bolt on or 2)generally traps in the 89-90 mph range, his traped higher which indicates that more was done to it than was stated (or that he's aware of).
I am sorry if you cannot drive. There is no reason that an Si with I/H/E should not be able to cut high 14's with a good driver. The times you are getting are only 1 tenth quicker then what I ran with only intake, think about it. And yes, all my times were done on the stock tires, no weight reduction, full interior. </TD></TR></TABLE>
it seems you have an opinion on everything don't you.... First off, I can drive...which is why I posted my 60' times so people could see that traction was an issue in my times. Second, I should have clarified that I didn't actually have a true exhaust on my car at that time, it was only an axle back. Factor those 2 things in and I could have hit a high 14 quarter. The point I made in my post was his ending MPH which was 91+ mph, something that indicates the overall power an engine is making. Good driving will get you down the strip with a faster time but only more HP will give you a higher MPH. A relatively stock Si (maybe with a bolt on or 2)generally traps in the 89-90 mph range, his traped higher which indicates that more was done to it than was stated (or that he's aware of).
10-02-2004, 11:55 AM
#42
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (Hybrid93Eg)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hybrid93Eg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">So wait a minute. You ran a whopping .2 slower then I run with a stock Si in your pig of a Del Sol and somehow my times (and the other guys) are bullshit? I fail to see the logic here. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Plain in simple, you're a liar man. We MIGHT be able to believe you if maybe you had CAI, header, and catback exhaust. But an AEM intake isn't going to make you .5 seconds faster in a 1/4 mile. Get your head out of your ***.
Plain in simple, you're a liar man. We MIGHT be able to believe you if maybe you had CAI, header, and catback exhaust. But an AEM intake isn't going to make you .5 seconds faster in a 1/4 mile. Get your head out of your ***.
10-02-2004, 12:36 PM
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (del_sol_tuner)
Once again, I have a pig of an EM1 with a complete sound system and full interior, I ran 14.9 @ 90 mph at Carlsbad, CA, bone stock except my brand new clutch and a test pipe. This was my first time at the drag strip, ever. I only ran 3 times, the third time being fastest.
This car is very capable of high 14s stock (i did it myself, ****), you just need to get that power to the ground effectively, my suspension is done and I had falken azenis at the time.
I have since installed an AEM cai and a DC header but haven't ran it at the track since. I doubt those mods do much anyways... Putting a header on a Civic is a joke!! Anybody want to buy a DC 4-1 ceramic header? $120.
This car is very capable of high 14s stock (i did it myself, ****), you just need to get that power to the ground effectively, my suspension is done and I had falken azenis at the time.
I have since installed an AEM cai and a DC header but haven't ran it at the track since. I doubt those mods do much anyways... Putting a header on a Civic is a joke!! Anybody want to buy a DC 4-1 ceramic header? $120.
10-02-2004, 12:49 PM
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (YOUR MAMA)
Then again, 14's and 15's are all slow as **** anyways, why argue?
If I wanted to drag race, I would have bought a 5.0 cobra. Not a Honda Civic. You can build/boost your Civic to be decent, but that takes $$ and dedication. I drive an Si for the handling.
Seriously.
If I wanted to drag race, I would have bought a 5.0 cobra. Not a Honda Civic. You can build/boost your Civic to be decent, but that takes $$ and dedication. I drive an Si for the handling.
Seriously.
10-02-2004, 12:57 PM
#45
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New York, Ny
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (YOUR MAMA)
lol i dont understand y people hate on other cars that run better times than theirs .....some people are just better drivers than others and some cars happen to run better than others...
p.s this is just like saying no bone stock itr can hit a 14.5 and better with just a intake...but theres are like 100+ people on the itr forum hitting that
.....some people are just better drivers than others and some cars happen to run better than others...p.s this is just like saying no bone stock itr can hit a 14.5 and better with just a intake...but theres are like 100+ people on the itr forum hitting that
10-02-2004, 01:16 PM
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (Got Milk)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Got Milk »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">lol i dont understand y people hate on other cars that run better times than theirs </TD></TR></TABLE>
jealousy. straight up.
I would be angry too, if I dumped $$ into my motor and was anticipating a mustang killer, but my civic remained slow....
</TD></TR></TABLE>jealousy. straight up.
I would be angry too, if I dumped $$ into my motor and was anticipating a mustang killer, but my civic remained slow....
10-02-2004, 01:50 PM
#47
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: tHe LOnEsTar StAtE biches, TX
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (cappa)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cappa »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Who does he have to prove it to? You are nobody and what you think doesnt matter. The poor kid is just asking what everyone elses times are, not for your non-professional opinion. Someone else was right there on the times with him anyways like .2 off his so its not impossible and Im sure the car was used so who know what else could have been done.</TD></TR></TABLE>
HAHAHA! newbie defending newbiE.
HAHAHA! newbie defending newbiE.
10-02-2004, 02:08 PM
#48
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: cincinnati, oh
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (del_sol_tuner)
yeah, sometimes, which is extremely rare, you get a perfect motor. that might be your case. but my brother had a 94 dx coupe with i/e only and ran a 16.1
10-02-2004, 02:27 PM
#49
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New York, Ny
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (YOUR MAMA)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by YOUR MAMA »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
jealousy. straight up.
I would be angry too, if I dumped $$ into my motor and was anticipating a mustang killer, but my civic remained slow....
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yea thats what im saying...all the people hatin on the guy just live to the fact the dude just might be a 10x better driver than u are..and he was lucky to get a time like that.... dont hate just congradulate
silvervtecrx good shyt on the time
jealousy. straight up.
I would be angry too, if I dumped $$ into my motor and was anticipating a mustang killer, but my civic remained slow....
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yea thats what im saying...all the people hatin on the guy just live to the fact the dude just might be a 10x better driver than u are..and he was lucky to get a time like that.... dont hate just congradulate
silvervtecrx good shyt on the time
10-02-2004, 06:46 PM
#50
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 99-2000 si wat is ur best track time (del_sol_tuner)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by del_sol_tuner »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Plain in simple, you're a liar man. We MIGHT be able to believe you if maybe you had CAI, header, and catback exhaust. But an AEM intake isn't going to make you .5 seconds faster in a 1/4 mile. Get your head out of your ***. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Why would I have any reason to lie about the times my slow *** Si ran? I just don't see why you people have such a hard time with what other people have run. Sorry your car didn't run the same times. If anyone has thier "head in thier ***", its the people who get all butthurt over something so lame. Thats part of the reason I don't take time to scan the slips. Even if I did, you wouldn't believe me, so whats it matter? I no longer own the car and have moved on to faster things. I know the Si was slow and honestly don't give a damn what it ran. I was just replying to the topic with my results.
Plain in simple, you're a liar man. We MIGHT be able to believe you if maybe you had CAI, header, and catback exhaust. But an AEM intake isn't going to make you .5 seconds faster in a 1/4 mile. Get your head out of your ***.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Why would I have any reason to lie about the times my slow *** Si ran? I just don't see why you people have such a hard time with what other people have run. Sorry your car didn't run the same times. If anyone has thier "head in thier ***", its the people who get all butthurt over something so lame. Thats part of the reason I don't take time to scan the slips. Even if I did, you wouldn't believe me, so whats it matter? I no longer own the car and have moved on to faster things. I know the Si was slow and honestly don't give a damn what it ran. I was just replying to the topic with my results.