2000 Civic SI 15.1 @91mph.
03-14-2004, 05:46 PM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sterling, Va
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2000 Civic SI 15.1 @91mph.
went to the track today and my buddy ran a 15.1 with only an intake, full interior and some suspension stuff(nothing major). this was his first time to the track, what do you guys think. im amazed 
03-14-2004, 05:49 PM
#2
Risky Business
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Trackside with the smoking bee
Posts: 25,211
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes
on
39 Posts
Re: 2000 Civic SI 15.1 @91mph. (gtistile)
I am too...there are a few guys on this board who have gotten around there...most si's are high 15's so tell ur bud he's a kickass driver
03-14-2004, 05:51 PM
#4
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eastside ATL, GA
Posts: 2,590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2000 Civic SI 15.1 @91mph. (gtistile)
not jaw dropping results....stock is about 16.0 i believe...u sure nothing else has been done to the car....
edit: what kind of intake???
edit: what kind of intake???
03-14-2004, 05:53 PM
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 2000 Civic SI 15.1 @91mph. (Jswpstdoff)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jswpstdoff »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">stock is about 16.0 i believe...u sure nothing else has been done to the car....</TD></TR></TABLE>
he just has an intake. how often do you see people have just an intake drop them down to almost a whole second?
he just has an intake. how often do you see people have just an intake drop them down to almost a whole second?
03-14-2004, 05:55 PM
#6
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eastside ATL, GA
Posts: 2,590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2000 Civic SI 15.1 @91mph. (jL iLLuZiOnz 9)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jL iLLuZiOnz 9 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">how often do you see people have just an intake drop them down to almost a whole second?</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BauleyCivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">there are a few guys on this board who have gotten around there </TD></TR></TABLE>
it's not impossible... and a car with suspension modifications will run lower numbers than the same car on stock suspension....
slammed si, with a cai.... 15.8-16.0 = stock to 15.1 = not impossible...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BauleyCivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">there are a few guys on this board who have gotten around there </TD></TR></TABLE>
it's not impossible... and a car with suspension modifications will run lower numbers than the same car on stock suspension....
slammed si, with a cai.... 15.8-16.0 = stock to 15.1 = not impossible...
03-14-2004, 05:59 PM
#7
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eastside ATL, GA
Posts: 2,590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2000 Civic SI 15.1 @91mph. (Jswpstdoff)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by STEALTHMODECOUPE »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">00 Si..AEM short ram intake..street tires and no weight reduction
2.3 60'
15.3@91 mph
adaM</TD></TR></TABLE>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=671738
2.3 60'
15.3@91 mph
adaM</TD></TR></TABLE>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=671738
Trending Topics
03-14-2004, 06:34 PM
#9
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2000 Civic SI 15.1 @91mph. (Jswpstdoff)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jswpstdoff »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">not jaw dropping results....stock is about 16.0 i believe...u sure nothing else has been done to the car....
edit: what kind of intake???</TD></TR></TABLE> um actually my stock d16y8 in a ex coupe ran a 16.1 so a b16a2 is def not 16.. its more like a low to mid 15's car
edit: what kind of intake???</TD></TR></TABLE> um actually my stock d16y8 in a ex coupe ran a 16.1 so a b16a2 is def not 16.. its more like a low to mid 15's car
03-14-2004, 06:38 PM
#10
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2000 Civic SI 15.1 @91mph. (ekb18cCivic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ekb18cCivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> um actually my stock d16y8 in a ex coupe ran a 16.1 so a b16a2 is def not 16.. its more like a low to mid 15's car</TD></TR></TABLE>
hahah ive seen plenty si's run high 15- low 16's, they are not fast at all unless nicly modded
hahah ive seen plenty si's run high 15- low 16's, they are not fast at all unless nicly modded
03-14-2004, 06:40 PM
#11
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2000 Civic SI 15.1 @91mph. (SleepnCiViC)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SleepnCiViC »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
hahah ive seen plenty si's run high 15- low 16's, they are not fast at all unless nicly modded</TD></TR></TABLE> those are some horrible drivers then.. that car should easily pull a mid 15
hahah ive seen plenty si's run high 15- low 16's, they are not fast at all unless nicly modded</TD></TR></TABLE> those are some horrible drivers then.. that car should easily pull a mid 15
03-14-2004, 07:02 PM
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's pretty hard to believe that a SI w/ just an intake can run 15.1. Even with a great driver, running 15.1 is pretty tough on a car that does high 15s stock. But, eh... what do I know. Things happen. =]
60ft times?
60ft times?
03-14-2004, 07:04 PM
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: GO LEAFS GO, NY, USA
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Nexx)
TIREs also make a HUGE difference........when i ran my '00 Si back in 2000 (wow, 4 years ago) i could only muster a 15.6 @ 88
THE STOCK michelins are HORRIBLE, then again, im sure he doenst have 4 year old tires on his car. none the less, with only an intake, this Si owner gives your buddy a
THE STOCK michelins are HORRIBLE, then again, im sure he doenst have 4 year old tires on his car. none the less, with only an intake, this Si owner gives your buddy a
03-14-2004, 07:13 PM
#16
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sterling, Va
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Mr. Vapor)
it was my buddies run, 1st time at the track as well. i remember the trap speed being around 90-91 mph but i dont have the timeslip with me and he's asleep, but i will post it up tommorow, and i assure you it DID happen, i have it on video and will try to post it up tommorow. and all he has is an intake (AEM cold air i believe, i will find out specifics tommorow). another buddy of mine let me take his SI down the track for the first time. he has intake and exhaustm big system and i pulled a 15.8 around 88.5 mph and was happy with that, considering i hadnt driven in a month(suspended license 
) and first time driving his car, but we are talking about close to 1 full second faster here. i still cant figure out how he did it 
the more i think about it, the harder it is for me to believe. for this fast stock SI
) and first time driving his car, but we are talking about close to 1 full second faster here. i still cant figure out how he did it the more i think about it, the harder it is for me to believe. for this fast stock SI
03-14-2004, 08:09 PM
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NE
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2000 Civic SI 15.1 @91mph. (Dj Villain)
That's what a good driver at elevation should run w/ an intake. Obviously not everytime though. I ran high 14's in an Si with I/H/E, suspension and good rubber. I've seen people have freak runs of like 14.6-14.7 too, but I would never quote those times as normal.
03-14-2004, 08:12 PM
#22
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North MIA, FL, USA
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2000 Civic SI 15.1 @91mph. (SleepnCiViC)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SleepnCiViC »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
hahah ive seen plenty si's run high 15- low 16's, they are not fast at all unless nicly modded</TD></TR></TABLE>
its all driver i went to the track and saw an si with intake and exhuast get beat by an si with a short ram which ran 15.3 , im not exactly sure what the stock 1/4 mile time is but i think its 15.7 im not sure
hahah ive seen plenty si's run high 15- low 16's, they are not fast at all unless nicly modded</TD></TR></TABLE>
its all driver i went to the track and saw an si with intake and exhuast get beat by an si with a short ram which ran 15.3 , im not exactly sure what the stock 1/4 mile time is but i think its 15.7 im not sure
03-15-2004, 04:02 PM
#25
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beatin Up Bums, USA, USA
Posts: 4,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: (eghatch4sale)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by eghatch4sale »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i agree si's are not fast at all!!!!!!!!!!! i have been to many different tracks and seen many si's and 15.1 ......no!!!!!!!!!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Really? And what info do you have to back that up? 15.1 is impressive but definately believable. I don't know where you get the idea that Si's are not fast at all but maybe you need to check your sources because they may not be fast but they are definately not slow...people just need to learn how to drive them.
Really? And what info do you have to back that up? 15.1 is impressive but definately believable. I don't know where you get the idea that Si's are not fast at all but maybe you need to check your sources because they may not be fast but they are definately not slow...people just need to learn how to drive them.