onetwothreelookatme

OK first off, I tryed searching but am still fairly new and had no luck. Second, I'm not sure of the exact chasis code for a 96-00 Coupe so I just put EK? sorry if that's wrong. Anyways, I was wondering what the stock for stock 1/4th mile times would be for an EX 96-00 Coupe and a Si/(next best trim) 92-95 Hatch. Both would be 100% stock. Thanks.

=GAME=

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ty_ &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> Anyways, I was wondering what the stock for stock 1/4th mile times would be for an EX 96-00 Coupe and a Si/(next best trim) 92-95 Hatch. Both would be 100% stock. Thanks.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

if the 92-95 si is white it will be faster

-too many variables
-too many of the dumb questions
-search is on the top right corner
-better yet a little past the search button on the top right of the monitor is a X. help yourself out

onetwothreelookatme

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by =GAMEOVER= &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

if the 92-95 si is white it will be faster

-too many variables
-too many of the dumb questions
-search is on the top right corner
-better yet a little past the search button on the top right of the monitor is a X. help yourself out</TD></TR></TABLE>

There is genrally an average time.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BauleyCivic &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">new si --&gt; 16.0 in the 1/4
WRX --&gt; 14.2 in the 1/4</TD></TR></TABLE>

as BauleyCivic writes, 16.0 for a new Si and 14.2 for a WRX. So why don't you do your self a favor and instead of trying to make your self look cool and thug your wanna-be mod **** out. Click the little X you so gracefully explained to me.

=GAME=

hold up where the **** a new si and a wrx came from?

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ty_ &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
as BauleyCivic writes, 16.0 for a new Si and 14.2 for a WRX. So why don't you do your self a favor and instead of trying to make your self look cool and thug your wanna-be mod **** out. Click the little X you so gracefully explained to me.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

you asked about a 96+ Ex and 92-95 eg si.

get your mind right playa

I'll cut ya!

Who gives a ****? Theyre both slow.

onetwothreelookatme

Just pulling that up from another post on here to show you that it's fesible to estimate 1/4th times. Obviously they won't be exact as there are alot of variables, but unless you got some idiot driving the car stock for stock the times won't vary that much.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by I'll cut ya! &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Who gives a ****? Theyre both slow.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Trying to figure out wich is slower or if one will be a complete dog to daily driver until I swap it.

=GAME=

https://honda-tech.com/zerosearch

look thru em and youll find an average time

Street Ghost

My 93 EX Coupe (same motor as a 92-95 SI Hatch) did a 15.908 in the quarter mile with a completely stock motor. My 60' time was a 2.3; with a 2.2 60' time, my 1/4 mile might be slightly faster.

screwballz

i guess i'll help out if noone else wants to..

-96-00 EX's usually run mid to low 16's, high 15's with some bolt-ons and a good driver

-99-00 Si's i've seen anywhere from high 15's to low 15's.

those are from personal expierences. 92-95 i'm not sure but from reading around here mid/high 15's - low 16's for the Si. a little slower for the coupes. (high 15's to mid 16's). but again, thats just from memory from reading around here. and of course it does depend on a lot of factors. all those times are with good drivers. my friend ran 17.8's with his CX EK hatch but as he got better his times did also. his best is a 16.6 with just an intake. i'm just giving you very rough estimates..


check out https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=858511 for SOHC 1/4 times and https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=858510 for DOHC 1/4 times

onetwothreelookatme

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by screwballz &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i guess i'll help out if noone else wants to..

-96-00 EX's usually run mid to low 16's, high 15's with some bolt-ons and a good driver

-99-00 Si's i've seen anywhere from high 15's to low 15's.

those are from personal expierences. 92-95 i'm not sure but from reading around here mid/high 15's - low 16's for the Si. a little slower for the coupes. (high 15's to mid 16's). but again, thats just from memory from reading around here. and of course it does depend on a lot of factors. all those times are with good drivers. my friend ran 17.8's with his CX EK hatch but as he got better his times did also. his best is a 16.6 with just an intake. i'm just giving you very rough estimates..


check out https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=858511 for SOHC 1/4 times and https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=858510 for DOHC 1/4 times</TD></TR></TABLE>

Thanks! helped alot.

Jamez

Actually the EG Si and EX pretty much run the same time. The fact that the Si doesn't have a trunk is compensated by the rear disc brakes (discs are heavier than drums). They both run in between 15.9 to 16.1sec. Of course that's if the EX is not a slowmatic.

The EK EX coupe weighs in near 300lbs more and run in between 16.1 to 16.3.

Of couse there are exceptions to everything.

Deemeetree

If you're going to leave them stock for now, they're both ******* slow, enough said.