Function and Form coilover thread
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 1
From: OOOOOREGON.
Function and Form coilover thread
Well i'm gonna be ordering some soon and would like people to post their setup along with ride height and comments/reviews on this product...thanks!!.. (and please don't tell me to search because I didn't really find what i was looking for)
Re: Function and Form coilover thread (usdmEHboy)
If you are gonna get them from around town, try http://www.PRERacing.com... good shop, they have a lot of nice parts there... 
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 1
From: OOOOOREGON.
Re: Function and Form coilover thread (Nate047)
cool i'll check it out..a sponsor on h-t has them on sale for a super good price right now...o yea you HAVE to let me know when you guys have a meet there so i can cruise down and meet some new people
![^Sammy]!.'s Avatar](https://honda-tech.com/forums/customavatars/avatar999313983_1.gif){kind=avatar}
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 0
From: 9/11/01 WTC Never Forget, United States Of America
Re: Function and Form coilover thread (usdmEHboy)
Here are 2 pics of my hatch tucked 15" SiR wheels suspension is funtion/form type 2 ITR spec
I love them they ride hella good
I love them they ride hella good
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 0
From: 9/11/01 WTC Never Forget, United States Of America
Re: Function and Form coilover thread (usdmEHboy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by usdmEHboy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nice...is there a reason you went with the type II's instead of I's..looks awesome btw</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanx
Well I had the type I's and then when the type II's came out i decided to upgrade
Thanx
Well I had the type I's and then when the type II's came out i decided to upgrade
Trending Topics
B*a*n*n*e*d
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Re: (waddy41)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by waddy41 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hows the quality</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 1
From: OOOOOREGON.
Re: (foam)
yea i'm just wondering if it's better for me to get the type II's since cost doesn't really matter...just want to know if there are any advantages of the II's instead of the I's
Sweet Title
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Re: (usdmEHboy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by usdmEHboy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yea i'm just wondering if it's better for me to get the type II's since cost doesn't really matter...just want to know if there are any advantages of the II's instead of the I's</TD></TR></TABLE>
I know one thing about the IIs over the Is, the dampening selector **** actually clicks into place now. Not sure what else, I was considering these for a while, might go with them in the future, but I think it might be ksports for me for now.
I know one thing about the IIs over the Is, the dampening selector **** actually clicks into place now. Not sure what else, I was considering these for a while, might go with them in the future, but I think it might be ksports for me for now.
Re: (usdmEHboy)
pics wont do anything more. its a verbal or real life experience thing. you could have cut springs and wouldn't SEE the difference.
Had the version ones on my integra, felt great for 600 bucks. The dampening on the version 2 is much better. Slightly lower spring rates but a much better ride quality and as mentioned above, more evident stiffness adjustment.
Had the version ones on my integra, felt great for 600 bucks. The dampening on the version 2 is much better. Slightly lower spring rates but a much better ride quality and as mentioned above, more evident stiffness adjustment.
Re: (Le)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Le »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why is type II better then type I? 
Modified by Le at 10:17 PM 12/14/2006</TD></TR></TABLE>
serious?! haha read above
Modified by Le at 10:17 PM 12/14/2006</TD></TR></TABLE>
serious?! haha read above
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
From: Liger Land, CA, USA
Re: (Mr.OB*GYN_Rhett)
my friend has the type I on his Dc2 and it rides liek a dream. He's tucking by about 1 finger in the front and it's sitting flush w/the tire in the rear [just for DD]. The dampening adjustment [although it does not cliick like the type II] is still very useful and practical. Can't beat riding semi-dumped with a close-to-stock ride quality.
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
From: somewhere in INGLEWOOD chillin in tha hood, CA
Re: Function and Form coilover thread (SickAssLy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SickAssLy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">F&F type 1 on my DC5 rides very smooth, but the only thing i dont like is that for my
application the shock body is not adjustable..
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Something we changed for the type II adjustable shock body. i know that probably doesnt help you but when your ready for an upgrade let me know. 
And for the original poster if money isnt the issue get the TYPE II SWIFT springs edition with custom rates...
application the shock body is not adjustable..
</TD></TR></TABLE>Something we changed for the type II adjustable shock body.
i know that probably doesnt help you but when your ready for an upgrade let me know. And for the original poster if money isnt the issue get the TYPE II SWIFT springs edition with custom rates...
