Mugen Thread
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 0
Re: (NIKE SB'd)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NIKE SB’d »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
That can't possibly be true because the VX/CX are a different weight than the DX... so how can the DX sedan be two different weights at once?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
whatever is equivalent or similar to the VX hatch.
That can't possibly be true because the VX/CX are a different weight than the DX... so how can the DX sedan be two different weights at once?
</TD></TR></TABLE>whatever is equivalent or similar to the VX hatch.
Rotary Lift Specialist
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 15,298
Likes: 0
Re: (asiandoood)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by asiandoood »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
whatever is equivalent or similar to the VX hatch. </TD></TR></TABLE>
cx/vx hatch is not the same as a dx sedan, no way in hell. IIRC CX/VX came from the factory at 2080 or something like that, the dx sedan was maybe 2300, now I am curious so I'm gonna have to look it up.
Edit, I was close 2094 for the 2 hatches, 2275 for the sedan
whatever is equivalent or similar to the VX hatch. </TD></TR></TABLE>
cx/vx hatch is not the same as a dx sedan, no way in hell. IIRC CX/VX came from the factory at 2080 or something like that, the dx sedan was maybe 2300, now I am curious so I'm gonna have to look it up.
Edit, I was close 2094 for the 2 hatches, 2275 for the sedan
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 12,290
Likes: 1
From: above 5k
Re: (Cain Marko)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Cain Marko »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
cx/vx hatch is not the same as a dx sedan, no way in hell. IIRC CX/VX came from the factory at 2080 or something like that, the dx sedan was maybe 2300, now I am curious so I'm gonna have to look it up.
Edit, I was close 2094 for the 2 hatches, 2275 for the sedan</TD></TR></TABLE>
I have to agree with him. I remeber having this discussion a while back about the 96-00 civic sedan vs. hatch. I know it seems the other way.
I found this: 1997 LX sedan 2405, 1997 hatch 2238/2304
<U>1998 DX sedan 2319, 1998 hatch 2392</U>
cx/vx hatch is not the same as a dx sedan, no way in hell. IIRC CX/VX came from the factory at 2080 or something like that, the dx sedan was maybe 2300, now I am curious so I'm gonna have to look it up.
Edit, I was close 2094 for the 2 hatches, 2275 for the sedan</TD></TR></TABLE>
I have to agree with him. I remeber having this discussion a while back about the 96-00 civic sedan vs. hatch. I know it seems the other way.
I found this: 1997 LX sedan 2405, 1997 hatch 2238/2304
<U>1998 DX sedan 2319, 1998 hatch 2392</U>
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 14,715
Likes: 1
From: Turning the haters into likers
Re: (asiandoood)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by asiandoood »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
whatever is equivalent or similar to the VX hatch. </TD></TR></TABLE>
No that's wrong. The CX/VX is 2094... The DX sedan is 2275 which is the same as a DX hatch, but it's still 181 pounds heavier than a VX.
whatever is equivalent or similar to the VX hatch. </TD></TR></TABLE>
No that's wrong. The CX/VX is 2094... The DX sedan is 2275 which is the same as a DX hatch, but it's still 181 pounds heavier than a VX.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 12,290
Likes: 1
From: above 5k
Re: (NIKE SB'd)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NIKE SB’d »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
No that's wrong. The CX/VX is 2094... The DX sedan is 2275 which is the same as a DX hatch, but it's still 181 pounds heavier than a VX. </TD></TR></TABLE>
you can strip 180 lbs almost.
No that's wrong. The CX/VX is 2094... The DX sedan is 2275 which is the same as a DX hatch, but it's still 181 pounds heavier than a VX. </TD></TR></TABLE>
you can strip 180 lbs almost.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,299
Likes: 0
From: selling YOU a Honda or Acura
Re: (dEXstar)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dEXstar »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Getting ready for the start of the autox season tomorrow.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Mugen + R Comps = me happy.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Mugen + R Comps = me happy.
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Re: (spooncvc)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by spooncvc »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
-Mugen STYLE Wide Body for the Honda Fit
-CRX with M7s</TD></TR></TABLE>
Fixed
-Mugen STYLE Wide Body for the Honda Fit
-CRX with M7s</TD></TR></TABLE>
Fixed
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,394
Likes: 0
From: Armed and Ready
Re: (get RIGHT)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by get RIGHT »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Mugen + R Comps = me happy. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah baby.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Yeah baby.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 0
Re: (just Touge)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by just Touge »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I have to agree with him. I remeber having this discussion a while back about the 96-00 civic sedan vs. hatch. I know it seems the other way.
I found this: 1997 LX sedan 2405, 1997 hatch 2238/2304
<U>1998 DX sedan 2319, 1998 hatch 2392</U></TD></TR></TABLE>
you guys are right. I did not remember correctly. However, the 98 specs were what I did somewhat remember where the sedan was lighter than the hatch. I got the generations mixed up. I believe it was the same discussion you were referring to a while back.
I have to agree with him. I remeber having this discussion a while back about the 96-00 civic sedan vs. hatch. I know it seems the other way.
I found this: 1997 LX sedan 2405, 1997 hatch 2238/2304
<U>1998 DX sedan 2319, 1998 hatch 2392</U></TD></TR></TABLE>
you guys are right. I did not remember correctly. However, the 98 specs were what I did somewhat remember where the sedan was lighter than the hatch. I got the generations mixed up. I believe it was the same discussion you were referring to a while back.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
From: Inna Woods, Canada
Re: (dEXstar)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dEXstar »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
</TD></TR></TABLE>
wheel #4?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
wheel #4?
Bloody Beaver
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 16,621
Likes: 0
Re: (acura_el2000)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by acura_el2000 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
wheel #4? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Are you blind?
wheel #4?
</TD></TR></TABLE>Are you blind?
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,299
Likes: 0
From: selling YOU a Honda or Acura
Re: (acura_el2000)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by acura_el2000 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
wheel #4? </TD></TR></TABLE>
You gotta look in MY trunk for it.
wheel #4?
</TD></TR></TABLE>You gotta look in MY trunk for it.
Re: (asiandoood)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by asiandoood »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
you guys are right. I did not remember correctly. However, the 98 specs were what I did somewhat remember where the sedan was lighter than the hatch. I got the generations mixed up. I believe it was the same discussion you were referring to a while back. </TD></TR></TABLE>
96 EX sedan = 2319lbs
96 CX hatch = 2238lbs
net difference of 81 lbs.
you guys are right. I did not remember correctly. However, the 98 specs were what I did somewhat remember where the sedan was lighter than the hatch. I got the generations mixed up. I believe it was the same discussion you were referring to a while back. </TD></TR></TABLE>
96 EX sedan = 2319lbs
96 CX hatch = 2238lbs
net difference of 81 lbs.
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 14,715
Likes: 1
From: Turning the haters into likers
Re: (Brice.Hayden)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Brice.Hayden »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
96 EX sedan = 2319lbs
96 CX hatch = 2238lbs
net difference of 81 lbs.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
That's not right, the EX sedan weighed 2568, the DX sedan is the one that weighed 2319 and that's only the AT version, the manual version weighed 2370... Furthermore the CX hatch weighs 2222lbs, NOT 2238. I don't know where you're getting those numbers from lol.
So your figure should actually read
96 EX sedan = 2568
96 CX hatch = 2222
net difference of 346 lbs in favor of the hatch, NOT the sedan.
96 EX sedan = 2319lbs
96 CX hatch = 2238lbs
net difference of 81 lbs.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
That's not right, the EX sedan weighed 2568, the DX sedan is the one that weighed 2319 and that's only the AT version, the manual version weighed 2370... Furthermore the CX hatch weighs 2222lbs, NOT 2238. I don't know where you're getting those numbers from lol.
So your figure should actually read
96 EX sedan = 2568
96 CX hatch = 2222
net difference of 346 lbs in favor of the hatch, NOT the sedan.
