** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
Hi everyone. After a month and a week, my car is finally running. The project took longer than expected due ordering parts and getting the right parts. Time was also an issue due to work. Anyways, all I need now is a steering wheel alignment and wheel alignment.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sirash/6010391245/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sirash/6010927534/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sirash/6010928524/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sirash/6010928274/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sirash/6010391245/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sirash/6010927534/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sirash/6010928524/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sirash/6010928274/
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
I was not even considering tire wear. It is unsafe to operate the vehicle at specs outside of what the manufacturer recommends. Camber kits exist for a necessary reason, not to save tires. If someone chooses to drive their car at any settings other than manufacturer recommended, then they should understand that it is not in the norm. to deviate from spec. and any number of unforseen consequences can occur at the fault of the alignment. It should not be ok to mess with the alignment as a matter of course. It should be done for specific reasons. If you can't afford lowering the car properly, beware of risks.
A car with a slight amount of negative camber will generally grip the road during turns better than a car with zero camber as the car will "roll" during turns; the negative camber will cause the inside tires to become close to vertical, allowing them to maintain better grip. The exact angles needed will vary depending on driving conditions, driving style, etc, but a slight amount of negative camber will not hinder a car's performance. Along with that, camber won't outright wear a car's tires; provided the car has a toe alignment ("toe" being the angle being adjusted), the car should see very little premature wear over the life of the tires. I was running three degrees of negative camber at all four corners on my civic and didn't encounter any noticeable premature tire wear. That being said, negative camber in excess will cause the inside of the tire to wear faster than the outside.
Sir Ash - glad you fixed your car, new parts are looking fresh!
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: DREAMWERKZ_garage, souff CHINA
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
If it's not manufacturer recommendation, it is not as design intention and therefore less safe than factory spec. If you are attempting to reach a goal that is not a factory intended purpose for the car, alignment specs outside of what the manufacturer specifies may be necessary.
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
It's not "extreme", it's appropriate. Just because you do something unique on your car does not mean it's safe and therefore acceptable for others. If camber did not matter, there would not be a specification for it.
Quit assuming. I have only adjusted my camber once. When the car was aligned.
Quit assuming. I have only adjusted my camber once. When the car was aligned.
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
What benefit do you get from telling others not to install safety items on their car when it is a industry accepted practice to utilize such parts? What do you gain from being so confrontational about your opinions and the expression of facts by others? Properly educate yourself on items related to safety if you intend to give other people advice. Peoples lives could be at stake.
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
If it's not manufacturer recommendation, it is not as design intention and therefore less safe than factory spec. If you are attempting to reach a goal that is not a factory intended purpose for the car, alignment specs outside of what the manufacturer specifies may be necessary.
It's not "extreme", it's appropriate. Just because you do something unique on your car does not mean it's safe and therefore acceptable for others. If camber did not matter, there would not be a specification for it.
Quit assuming. I have only adjusted my camber once. When the car was aligned.
Quit assuming. I have only adjusted my camber once. When the car was aligned.
Honda also specifies 10w-30 or Honda MTF in the transmission, but many people use GM Syncromesh with better results. Speaking of assuming, the assumption that everything Honda specifies must be the best for the car goes against modifying a Honda.
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
I don't know, ask the manufacturer.
When a cars ride height is changed in any way, all 3 parts of the alignment are affected. It should be taken into consideration that some of these settings may fall out of spec. as a result of the modification. If the settings fall out of spec. in your case, the alignment should be adjusted back to factory recommended settings to retain drivability. Failure to make such adjustments and compensate for changes may lead to operating behavior which is unfamiliar to the operator and not as factory designed.
When a cars ride height is changed in any way, all 3 parts of the alignment are affected. It should be taken into consideration that some of these settings may fall out of spec. as a result of the modification. If the settings fall out of spec. in your case, the alignment should be adjusted back to factory recommended settings to retain drivability. Failure to make such adjustments and compensate for changes may lead to operating behavior which is unfamiliar to the operator and not as factory designed.
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
What benefit do you get from telling others not to install safety items on their car when it is a industry accepted practice to utilize such parts? What do you gain from being so confrontational about your opinions and the expression of facts by others? Properly educate yourself on items related to safety if you intend to give other people advice. Peoples lives could be at stake.
While you are replying to me about people's lives at stake, aftermarket UCAs (like the name-brand Skunk2) often have reviews of the balljoints failing prematurely as well as it hitting their shock tower, sometimes denting it.
https://honda-tech.com/forums/honda-civic-del-sol-1992-2000-1/another-skunk2-camber-kit-story-571666/
http://www.d-series.org/forums/suspe...ock-tower.html
I will say this again, I'm just here for a debate with facts, not to start an e-fight over camber kits. So please don't get offended if I say something contrary to what you say, just prove me wrong.
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
What are the consequences of having slightly more negative camber - "unsafe"? Better grip in corners? I'm not talking about extreme cases here either.
I'm not saying camber does not matter, but rather camber isn't changed to a point that a camber kit is necessary, unless the owner needs to adjust camber to fine tune the suspension (track, autocross).
Honda also specifies 10w-30 or Honda MTF in the transmission, but many people use GM Syncromesh with better results. Speaking of assuming, the assumption that everything Honda specifies must be the best for the car goes against modifying a Honda.
I'm not saying camber does not matter, but rather camber isn't changed to a point that a camber kit is necessary, unless the owner needs to adjust camber to fine tune the suspension (track, autocross).
Honda also specifies 10w-30 or Honda MTF in the transmission, but many people use GM Syncromesh with better results. Speaking of assuming, the assumption that everything Honda specifies must be the best for the car goes against modifying a Honda.
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
I would think that once a car is lowered the suspension geometry is changed slightly, thus using OEM specs would not be the optimum settings as they weren't designed for a lowered car.
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
I never told anyone to do anything or use any parts. I explained facts and offered information related to my car. I never tell anybody to use any parts other than OEM unless I specify a specific reason for it. If I do, I make sure to express that it's my opinion and not factory recommended.
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: DREAMWERKZ_garage, souff CHINA
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
Cmon now, you guys are talking about natural camber on a lowered dd, not on a race car taking tight turns at 60+ mph, it will not be so far out of spec where it will be dangerous.
Domani, it would be cool to have two different fronts to swapp around with. But if you're really planning on having an orthia front, good luck with swapping radiator support every time you change front ends.
Domani, it would be cool to have two different fronts to swapp around with. But if you're really planning on having an orthia front, good luck with swapping radiator support every time you change front ends.
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
When you go to get an alignment, they adjust the car to what the factory recommends unless you request otherwise. I'm not the crazy one here. You are.
I never said OEM spec. was "optimum" for a "lowered" car.
I never said OEM spec. was "optimum" for a "lowered" car.
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
Originally Posted by portfl0w
If you are attempting to reach a goal that is not a factory intended purpose for the car, alignment specs outside of what the manufacturer specifies may be necessary.
If you have facts to prove it otherwise I'd be happy to hear it. So far my opinion hasn't changed. And as for being confrontational, I'll let the quotes do the talking
What benefit do you get from telling others not to install safety items on their car when it is a industry accepted practice to utilize such parts? What do you gain from being so confrontational about your opinions and the expression of facts by others? Properly educate yourself on items related to safety if you intend to give other people advice. Peoples lives could be at stake.
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
Fair enough, I learned enough through researching my posts. One way to determine the correct amount of camber is to measure heat temperatures in all your tires and adjust accordingly.
portfl0w wins by default though, he's an 05'er
portfl0w wins by default though, he's an 05'er
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
You are trying to put words in my mouth and make it seem as though I have a specific angle. I have no angle. I am merely instructing people to use the factory approved method. If you have another perspective that varies from the OEM, that's completely fine. Do not attempt to insinuate or suggest that your opinions are facts based on testing and empirical data unless you can supply proof.
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ** The offical 96-00 civic 4dr thread ** PART 2
I didn't insinuate my opinions are based on testing. You haven't provided any proof, I provided several links where other people agreed with me. I'm done arguing, your opinion is obviously hard to change despite others agreeing with me.
Here's my car from a 5 hr trip today
Here's my car from a 5 hr trip today