what would you bore to?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 07:13 AM
  #26  
hypa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
From: somewhere in the valley,, BC.
Default Re: what would you bore to? (DroppedGSR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DroppedGSR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Yeah and so does 84mm</TD></TR></TABLE>

That's what I was thinking too.
A motor is something you can take from chassis to chassis, and I plan to do that with this setup. Of course, if the **** really hits the fan, no amount of boring can save a block.

Does anyone know why it's not recommended (by many import motor builders) to go past 86mm?
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 07:21 AM
  #27  
liam821's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,749
Likes: 26
From: Portland, OR
Default Re: what would you bore to? (DroppedGSR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DroppedGSR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Yeah and so does 84mm</TD></TR></TABLE>

Go 84mm, that will give you a nice big bore, with some room to grow if there are problem like you melt a piston!

liam
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:30 AM
  #28  
turbofodo's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Ankeny, Iowa, u.s.
Default

ok... you tell me im wrong for thinking it's cooling, but you gave absolutely no other reason...i think that if you want to argue then you should have a point... and who is talking about a naturally aspirated setup?
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 10:29 AM
  #29  
BodyKits NW's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,468
Likes: 0
From: Carbon Fiber Land, USA
Default Re: (turbofodo)

83mm
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 10:34 AM
  #30  
g2turbo's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,273
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Default Re: (turbofodo)

Benson sleeves and 81mm bore here

Instead of gaining an extra 15 hp with a heavier rotating assembly (not by much, i know) I can just raise the boost 1 psi haha j/k. To each his own.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 10:45 AM
  #31  
ekb18c's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,140
Likes: 0
From: nj
Default Re: what would you bore to? (hypa)

Stay at 81mm. You can still make great power on 81mm..
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 01:43 PM
  #32  
Trak_Day's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
From: st pete, fl, usa
Default Re: what would you bore to? (liam821)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by liam821 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Go 84mm, that will give you a nice big bore, with some room to grow if there are problem like you melt a piston!

liam</TD></TR></TABLE>

Way I see it is, if i really mess something up i will bore and build it NA and get another motor to build and boost!
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 02:43 PM
  #33  
hypa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
From: somewhere in the valley,, BC.
Default Re: what would you bore to? (ekb18c)

Does anyone have any idea as to why it's not recommended to bore over 86mm?

Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 10:33 AM
  #34  
.RAven's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: sleepyEG made me change my avatar
Default Re: what would you bore to? (hypa)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hypa &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The 81mm are 280 grams, and the 84mm are 286 grams.
Is it really that big of a difference, especially when running aftermarket rods and studs?

I'm thinking that an additional 15hp would be worth the small addition in weight, but I could be wrong.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

and I would like to live forever! I say do what ever you want. If you want more powr then you know the answer.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 10:37 AM
  #35  
trbob16a's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: washington, dc, usa
Default Re: (g2turbo)

I went 84.5mm and run over a bar daily with a 60-1. Works well. I can still go up to 85mm if I need to one day. Why "stay at 81mm ... you can make great power at 81mm" when you can go to 84mm at the same or close to it cost and make even greater power?

Go big. You won't regret it.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 11:30 AM
  #36  
Mr. Softee's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 0
From: Islip, CA, USA
Default Re: (99blackcivicSi)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 99blackcivicSi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Why wouldn't you bore a <U>AFTERMARKET SLEEVED</U> block over 82???????????? none is talking about stock sleeves aftermarket sleeves like GE, AEBS, Darton. those sleeves have been tested up to 55+ PSI so there should be no worries about running 20psi on them.</TD></TR></TABLE>

You are aware that just becuase 20psi of air pressure comes into the combution chamber, that does not mean that 20psi of force is the maximum exerted on the sleeved when combution takes place...
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 12:11 PM
  #37  
AngelTeg's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: The Route, NY, United States
Default Re: (turbofodo)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbofodo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the factory b-series has iron ductile sleeves...... so what kind of sleeves do you have?
</TD></TR></TABLE>

actually stock honda sleeves are a shitty, cast iron type... also typically refferred to as "Gray Iron."

when you say "Iron Ductile" I'm assuming you are refferring to Ductile Iron.. which is a very strong grade of Iron, with many of the same properties as a hardened steel... This is the material that most atermarket sleeve companies (including Darton) make there sleeves out of.

just FYI.
-Mike
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 12:52 PM
  #38  
Adriano's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
From: Vila Velha, Brasil
Default Re: (AngelTeg)

I'm going with 81mm also. I figured it like this. The more displacement (83, 84mm...) the more low end torque the motor will produce, right? With my stock motor @9lbs, traction is already an issue. I could see it only getting worst with more low end torque. Unless you it's a full race car, i would stay at 81mm. And for those of you that disagree...hey...we all have our different opinion.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 01:16 PM
  #39  
X2BOARD's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 1
From: Trinidad, W.I.
Default Re: (AngelTeg)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbofodo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ok... you tell me im wrong for thinking it's cooling, but you gave absolutely no other reason...</TD></TR></TABLE>

One word: COST

Producing an open-deck block is much more inexpensive... it's a single cast, saves time and quite a bit of money.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AngelTeg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
when you say "Iron Ductile" I'm assuming you are refferring to Ductile Iron.. which is a very strong grade of Iron...</TD></TR></TABLE>


I think that's why he referenced the fact that his sleeves are 'iron ductile'....that was established early in the thread.


As to why most builders don't recommend going over 86mm ? One of the probable reasons is that the larger you bore the cylinder, the more force is exerted by the piston onto the cylinder wall. As you increase the bore, you alter the angle of the incidence of rod/wrist pin/piston combination to the cylinder wall, so yes, you would create more power, but at the cost of increased wear on the engine.... vastly increased.... tear it apart early and you'd probably notice increased chances of scarring or the cylinder wall going 'out of round' much quicker than a smaller bore.

On top of that, at such a large bore, you begin to lose headgasket area between cylinders, making the sealing properties of the headgasket drop due to the loss of h/g area. Put simply, the sleeves can hold all the pressure in the world, but if the headgasket is unable to seal well enough... you'll blow them every few passes.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 02:35 PM
  #40  
tegasaurus's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ, usa
Default Re: (g2turbo)

eleventy billion mm.

-Ryan
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 06:23 PM
  #41  
boostedsol's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,663
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: (X2BOARD)

GE 84.5mm. I've had no problems. O-ringed.

Reply
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 08:49 AM
  #42  
hypa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
From: somewhere in the valley,, BC.
Default Re: (AngelTeg)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AngelTeg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

actually stock honda sleeves are a shitty, cast iron type... also typically refferred to as "Gray Iron."

when you say "Iron Ductile" I'm assuming you are refferring to Ductile Iron.. which is a very strong grade of Iron, with many of the same properties as a hardened steel... This is the material that most atermarket sleeve companies (including Darton) make there sleeves out of.

just FYI.
-Mike</TD></TR></TABLE>

This is worth repeating.
Thanks Mike.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 08:53 AM
  #43  
hypa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
From: somewhere in the valley,, BC.
Default Re: (hypa)

I'll stick with an 84mm bore.
I can live with 1.9L, and if things break, there's always the ability to go a bit bigger.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
delsol8017
Forced Induction
31
Nov 7, 2019 08:00 AM
dezerte
Acura Integra
8
Feb 26, 2007 08:48 PM
H22Luda720
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
2
Mar 20, 2006 01:33 PM
penjaja
Forced Induction
10
Mar 23, 2003 08:17 PM
KooK
Acura Integra
3
Mar 27, 2002 05:37 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:06 AM.