Turbo? Yes / No

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 29, 2004 | 10:25 PM

Nippon

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 242

Likes: 0

From: Torrance, Cali, La

Turbo? Yes / No

I have a Eg6 Si and I was wondering whether or not i should add a turbo to it. The motor itself has around 100,000 miles on it. Its a b16a " first gen" do you recommend i add the turbo and take it off when my engine blows? Or should i just replace the whole motor w/ a turbo kit. Thanks

Oct 29, 2004 | 10:45 PM

Luserkid

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Oct 2002

Posts: 12,653

Likes: 7

From: Cali

Re: Turbo? Yes / No (mUrked179)

What do you want to do? If you have a EG6 i would just leave it alone.

Oct 29, 2004 | 10:57 PM

Street Ghost

Member

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 3,047

Likes: 1

From: CA, USA

Re: Turbo? Yes / No (Luserkid)

Compression test...

Oct 29, 2004 | 10:58 PM

PhreeStyleHB

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts: 1,546

Likes: 0

From: nashville, tn, usa

Re: Turbo? Yes / No (mUrked179)

umm, build it and turbo.... and you dont have a eg6 =P

Oct 29, 2004 | 11:05 PM

=GAME=

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 2,121

Likes: 3

From: You Dont Want nO Problem in New Hoeleans

Re: Turbo? Yes / No (mUrked179)

if the motor is healthy, boost it.

Oct 29, 2004 | 11:54 PM

murmur9

Trial User

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 1,016

Likes: 1

From: louisville, ky, USA

Re: Turbo? Yes / No (=GAMEOVER=)

Boost is always fun. 100K isn't bad, it isn't good. Check everything out, if its still strong, throw a FI set on. No need in spending money on another motor. unless you just want to run massive ammounts of boost, and use the other as a quick replacement.

Oct 30, 2004 | 01:07 AM

Nippon

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 242

Likes: 0

From: Torrance, Cali, La

Re: Turbo? Yes / No (murmur9)

thanks appreciate all the help.

Trending Topics

ITR 01-0431 Modification Thread

135

12.4k
99 Honda civic ( Iâ€™m a woman trying to do it all myself. I literally have...

6

2.4k
1999 Civic D15Z6 - spark plug colors? high HC on emissions

10

438
08-12 Accord P0339 Starter heat shield?

4

563
Hello, I'm Crumple, I am trying to rebuild my 83 civic.

2

232

Oct 30, 2004 | 01:23 AM

yoshi_1r

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 181

Likes: 0

From: Florence, Kentucky, USA

boost it but just 7 psi...no intercooler..kinda like a sleeper

Oct 30, 2004 | 01:45 AM

duh blacksheep

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 223

Likes: 0

From: walnut/orange, california, Cuba

Re: (yoshi_1r)

i boosted my motor with 90k milkes on it (d16z6). i did a compression test 3k miles ago and read ~200psi across the board, so age doesnt necessarily mean poorer than new performance

and i drove the turbo kit non-intercooled and no BOV for 1.5 years before i installed both. greddy turbo kit

Oct 30, 2004 | 04:09 AM

#10

Ricey McRicerton

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jan 2002

Posts: 15,334

Likes: 1

From: Raleigh, NC

Re: (yoshi_1r)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by yoshi_1r »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">boost it but just 7 psi...no intercooler..kinda like a sleeper</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yeah, because boosting with no intercooler is the only way to be low profile... Also, it's not the least bit inefficent...

I'm boosted at 130k (have put close to 25k on the turbo setup) and BauleyCivic just got himself boosted at right about 180k. Compression test it, and if everything looks good, boost.

Oct 30, 2004 | 04:22 AM

#11

Pete_SI

Junior Member

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 567

Likes: 0

From: shediac, NB, Canada

Re: (Ricey McRicerton)

If you keep the grill and paint the intercooler black it's not that bad.

Oct 30, 2004 | 05:17 AM

#12

mildly.interesting

Joined: Oct 2002

Posts: 2,657

Likes: 1

From: in the woods, NC, USA

the learning curve for boost is steep, and expensive...

Oct 30, 2004 | 06:03 AM

#13

EdLeake

Joined: Feb 2004

Posts: 307

Likes: 1

From: England

What are you guys pushing from 7 psi horsepower wise?

I was tempted by a bolt-on GReddy kit intercooled and ran at 5psi but many tuners in the UK put me off simply because of the torque stress on the engine and transmission.

Oct 30, 2004 | 06:23 AM

#14

Del Sizzle

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 1,916

Likes: 0

Re: (EdLeake)

7psi for most set-ups should be somewhere around 50-60 hp

Oct 30, 2004 | 06:23 AM

#15

Maverik4k

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 398

Likes: 0

From: Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: Turbo? Yes / No (mUrked179)

Cars aren't cheap, if you want fast, theres no questions about it...turbo!
i would just turbo it then when something goes bad just rebuild it.

Oct 30, 2004 | 06:27 AM

#16

Del Sizzle

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 1,916

Likes: 0

Re: Turbo? Yes / No (Maverik4k)

That's not good advise. I've seen whole motors ruined over forced induction. Who has money to spend like that. It's always better to know your limits, and if you want to step past those limits you should do some upgrading first.

Oct 30, 2004 | 08:07 AM

#17

menkio

B*a*n*n*e*d

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 3,904

Likes: 1

From: Malt in yor moulth, boston

Re: Turbo? Yes / No (Del Sizzle)

1.B. Posting of topics relating to forced induction (N20, Turbo, SC) in EG+ Civic / Del Sol is not allowed. We have an entire forum dedicated to forced induction.
Forced Induction Forum: https://honda-tech.com/zeroforum?id=16

Oct 30, 2004 | 08:11 AM

#18

specv5150

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 3,116

Likes: 0

From: San Marcos, TX

Re: Turbo? Yes / No (Del Sizzle)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Del Sizzle »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">That's not good advise. I've seen whole motors ruined over forced induction. Who has money to spend like that. It's always better to know your limits, and if you want to step past those limits you should do some upgrading first.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Forced induction doesnt kill motors...people who dont know what they are doing usually destroy motors. While there are some rare cases where a motor is tuned and still blows is the exception not the rule. Turbo is the most cost efficient way to gain power in teh long run. Nitrous has a lower initial entry cost but refilling your bottel will add up. So anyway I say boost it. D series are easy to come by and I assume that is what you have so it isnt like you would have spend thousands of dollars for anoyher longblock

Oct 30, 2004 | 08:40 AM

#19

TheShodan

Moderator

iTrader: (14)

Joined: Jan 2002

Posts: 24,555

Likes: 242

From: City of Wind, IL, USA

Re: (Ricey McRicerton)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ricey McRicerton »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Yeah, because boosting with no intercooler is the only way to be low profile... Also, it's not the least bit inefficent...

I'm boosted at 130k (have put close to 25k on the turbo setup) and BauleyCivic just got himself boosted at right about 180k. Compression test it, and if everything looks good, boost.</TD></TR></TABLE>

People, people.. Intercooler helps prevent detonation... That's like saying that only gurgling water and not using a toothbrush keeps your teeth clean..