<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BoostedEG6 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

that is no where near the same wastegate placement as the OP's </TD></TR></TABLE>

That makes since...but what is no point in running a top mount on 8psi...?

 

because thats what all the cool kids are doing

 

pffft boost creeep is cool at low boost anyway. peak tq at 8k!

 

dont have that info man, sorry.

usually guys that are running these manifolds have a WG spring at 14psi and they are shooting for 600+

All the WG looks in the same place to me, but what do i know, i only make them

 

i do have a dyno of a guy locally with this same manifold, at 9psi on a stock GSR with a T3 super 60 making 280whp.

no boost creep either

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by VtecKiDD &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">All the WG looks in the same place to me, but what do i know, i only make them </TD></TR></TABLE>

you fn kidding me right?

oh yeah I forgot that the two extra elbows in it makes it in the same place and same amount of tube and bends

 

as i stated, same place off the runners, little longer on the one posted by the OP.

so what, still no boost creep issues

 

I am not talking about the placement off the runners I am talking about the length of the tube leading to the wastegate and how many bends are in it

 

the point is that in the future i will be running more boost than 8psi and I dont feel spending money on a log manifold and then buying a top mount, money is something I dont have to waste. Also instead of sleeving the block ill spend it on the LS head getting the P&P.

 

i'm only looking for 330whp and i'm running a topmount...