Should I switch tuners :/ ?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Suprdave »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
What are you talking about...he's right. Except I think he meant low vacuum when he said high...You can't just throw a 'hondata basemap' on a big injector car and expect it to fire up and run awesome...Now...if you have a basemap of previous tuned cars that are similar...speeds the process along very well.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Of course you can never expect a basemap to run fine, that's stupid obvious.
Now if you say that you can NEVER expect a car to run good with big injectors and should not adjust part throttle close to a 14.7 a/f...then there is something wrong with you.
Maybe you misunderstood what i tried to say?
anyways who cares...
I guess everybody tunes different this days, that's why everybody gets different results..
What are you talking about...he's right. Except I think he meant low vacuum when he said high...You can't just throw a 'hondata basemap' on a big injector car and expect it to fire up and run awesome...Now...if you have a basemap of previous tuned cars that are similar...speeds the process along very well.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Of course you can never expect a basemap to run fine, that's stupid obvious.
Now if you say that you can NEVER expect a car to run good with big injectors and should not adjust part throttle close to a 14.7 a/f...then there is something wrong with you.
Maybe you misunderstood what i tried to say?
anyways who cares...
I guess everybody tunes different this days, that's why everybody gets different results..
in defense of the orginal tuner this car was a little tricky. this car took me longer than most cars that are similar injector size/power level etc. i did drive the car before i touched it, and it was dead rich from idle to full throttle, and the plugs def. showed it. the program was at 99% duty cycle at 12psi, which explained a lot. timing map looked ok other than being very agressive. i ended up making peak power with about 8 degree's less timing. due to an ignition missfire problem we had to cut short on boost, but with the small amount i got to increase the boost i think we are going to be able to meet the customers HP goals. this car also has a very busy engine bay and suffers from heat soak pretty bad...so lots of cool down time is needed between runs. the idle is a little leaner than i want it to be at the moment, but that will be adressed next week.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



