Rod question
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Land Down, Under, Australia
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rod question
I want to lower the compression of my h23 to about 8-8.5 so that I can get boost!
Is the best way to do this by getting new rods? I want to reinforce the engine at the same time...
If so can anyone recommend a good brand to use?
Is the best way to do this by getting new rods? I want to reinforce the engine at the same time...
If so can anyone recommend a good brand to use?
#4
Re: Rod question (earl)
Just put on a thicker headgasket. Shorter rods would drop your engine size
However it is a bad way to try and lower compression, as you'll also kill quench area with the piston not reaching the same TDC point (same goes for thicker head gaskets). You could also potentially run into clearance issues between the piston skirt and crankshaft. The best way to lower compression is with properly designed aftermarket pistons, which are now readily available in a variety of compression ratios.
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Trinidad, W.I.
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Rod question (texan)
Just put on a thicker headgasket. Shorter rods would drop your engine size
Shorter rods have no effect on engine displacement.
However it is a bad way to try and lower compression, as you'll also kill quench area with the piston not reaching the same TDC point (same goes for thicker head gaskets). You could also potentially run into clearance issues between the piston skirt and crankshaft. The best way to lower compression is with properly designed aftermarket pistons, which are now readily available in a variety of compression ratios.
Shorter rods have no effect on engine displacement.
However it is a bad way to try and lower compression, as you'll also kill quench area with the piston not reaching the same TDC point (same goes for thicker head gaskets). You could also potentially run into clearance issues between the piston skirt and crankshaft. The best way to lower compression is with properly designed aftermarket pistons, which are now readily available in a variety of compression ratios.
X2
#6
Re: Rod question (X2BOARD)
It's the H22, or any FRM cylinder liner for that matter. You need iron sleeves for aftermarket pistons on the H22, which is just fine because the stock pistons (especially on the H22A4) are about the weakest ones to be found in any Honda 4 cylinder.
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Land Down, Under, Australia
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Rod question (texan)
thanks for the flood of input! Much appreciated.
So I have learned that aftermarket pistons are the way to go, but can anyone recommend a brand that woul dbe best suited to lower compression to about 8-8.5:1? I want something that is bulletproof...
Cheers!
So I have learned that aftermarket pistons are the way to go, but can anyone recommend a brand that woul dbe best suited to lower compression to about 8-8.5:1? I want something that is bulletproof...
Cheers!
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Secret Tweaker Pad
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Rod question (texan)
yeah, it definitely depends how much you want to boost on the motor. but i agree the thicker head gasket (cometic) is the cheap route, but you nneed the adjustable cams. If you want to make power and do it right, the pistons are the weakest link on a honga engine.
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Rod question (texan)
Shorter rods have no effect on engine displacement.
If you reread the original question, the guy only wanted to change the length of the rod to lower the compression, not install a shorter rod and change the pin height.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Land Down, Under, Australia
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Rod question (texan)
Basically, I would like to shave 1.5-2 seconds off my 0-60mph times (get it down to about 6 seconds) and hopefully run quarters in the low 12's.
I have no idea how realistic these goals are, but in the end, I don't want to kill my engine! What would I need to do to the engine (in terms of reinforcing) to run 10psi at a 9:1 compression ratio?
keeping in mind that i can really only afford a stage 1 setup (for the mean time, I plan to upgrade over the next year or so) are those results I want possible?
I have no idea how realistic these goals are, but in the end, I don't want to kill my engine! What would I need to do to the engine (in terms of reinforcing) to run 10psi at a 9:1 compression ratio?
keeping in mind that i can really only afford a stage 1 setup (for the mean time, I plan to upgrade over the next year or so) are those results I want possible?
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: elizabethton, tn, USA
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Rod question (Arch-Angel)
you will have to buy crower rods for the h23 which are about 650 dollars. eagle does not make a rod for this motor, only the h22
#13
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: St Eustache, QC, Canada
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Rod question (speedworks)
Rod length doesn't change ci the piston goes up and down the same length exept it come s down further and goes up less.
The stroke of the crank determines the amount of movement
Example: if you have 4 inch stroke then the piston travels 4 inches and changing the rod length doesn't change that the piston goes up and down 4 inches,it changes the position where it goes up and down
Remember CI=bore x bore x stroke x # of cyls x .7854
Not rod length.
Rod length only changes the rod ratio and the speed of the movement
The stroke of the crank determines the amount of movement
Example: if you have 4 inch stroke then the piston travels 4 inches and changing the rod length doesn't change that the piston goes up and down 4 inches,it changes the position where it goes up and down
Remember CI=bore x bore x stroke x # of cyls x .7854
Not rod length.
Rod length only changes the rod ratio and the speed of the movement
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Trinidad, W.I.
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Rod question (JDMB16ACRX)
lowering compression with a thicker head gasket, brings un necessary risks. Basically more chances of leaking. IMO
If you're not breakin' stuff, you're not making enough power...
#18
Re: Rod question (X2BOARD)
With that train of thought... we shouldn't do anything to increase the power on our cars
If you're not breakin' stuff, you're not making enough power...
If you're not breakin' stuff, you're not making enough power...
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Land Down, Under, Australia
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Rod question (texan)
OK OK!!! I will get new pistons!! We had already established that, but where can I get H23 pistons that will lower compression to 8:1?! I live in Australia, and no one down here has done much to hondas... It's finding out which brands do this sort of thing that I am having trouble with!
Is it worth doing the head gasket AS WELL AS the pistons for extra safety's sake?
If I want to run 10 pound boost safely can I run a 9:1 compression ratio?
AND
Will 10psi be enough to shave 1.5 seconds off 0-60mph and 2 seconds off quarter?
[Modified by Arch-Angel, 7:09 AM 10/24/2002]
Is it worth doing the head gasket AS WELL AS the pistons for extra safety's sake?
If I want to run 10 pound boost safely can I run a 9:1 compression ratio?
AND
Will 10psi be enough to shave 1.5 seconds off 0-60mph and 2 seconds off quarter?
[Modified by Arch-Angel, 7:09 AM 10/24/2002]
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Trinidad, W.I.
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Rod question (texan)
With that train of thought... we shouldn't do anything to increase the power on our cars
If you're not breakin' stuff, you're not making enough power...
That's not at all what he said. What he's saying (as am I) is that if you're going to do it, do it right. If you want to build the bottom end and lower compression, do it with pistons and not a thicker head gasket that partially negates it's own purpose by destroying quench tolerance. It will lower compression but at the same time increases the chances of detonation; the principle reason to drop compression in the first place.
If you're not breakin' stuff, you're not making enough power...
That's not at all what he said. What he's saying (as am I) is that if you're going to do it, do it right. If you want to build the bottom end and lower compression, do it with pistons and not a thicker head gasket that partially negates it's own purpose by destroying quench tolerance. It will lower compression but at the same time increases the chances of detonation; the principle reason to drop compression in the first place.
The only thing that I know a thicker H/G promotes is being blown. But that's was H/G's are for... they are the 'fuse' before you blow the motor anyway. Admittedly, thicker H/Gs is not the ideal way to go as it is not a stock H/G (stock rules) and affects the cam timing and belt fitment, but it does work as some members of this board will testify.
As far as where or who to get pistons from.... the majority of piston companies out there will make a piston for ANYTHING as long as you give them measurements such as bore size, desired CR and the like. Hell, I just had some custom JE's delivered, 40 over, 11.5:1 for a GSR, it took almost 6 weeks with delivery time and ran me a hair under $600 shipped. Getting a piston to spec will not be a problem.
9:1 will go 10psi on aftermarket pistons with NO problem, you can even go up to 9.5:1 with only 10psi safely. (Remember, tuning is everything, regardless) Haven't you heard of people boosting 7 and 8 psi on stock GSR bottom ends ? 10:1 CR !!! Of course, that's pretty crazy... but it can be done... WOW, it's late... am I tired..... ZZZZZZzzzzzzzz......
#21
Re: Rod question (X2BOARD)
X2BOARD- In order for quench area to be effective at increasing the knock tolerance of a combustion chamber, the piston needs to get as close to the quench pad as possible (and properly mate up to it). Without very tight tolerances here (KB Pistons feels anything over .080" removes any measurable effect), the point is lost. Most of the really good engine builders aim for a tolerance of .040-.050". In order to drop his 9.8:1 static CR to 9:1 with a thicker head gasket, he'd have to run a head gasket approx. 9mm taller than stock. In fact, just to drop his CR to 9.5:1, he'd still need to run a gasket 5mm thicker than stock. Either way, he'll remove every bit of the quenching effect, thus lowering detonation resistance. Many engine builders feel that dropping a 1/2 point of compression but losing quench effect results in a net loss of detonation resistance, meaning you're worse off than before. This is what I term as "doing it wrong".
Arch-Angel- Actually I never said you needed pistons, the honest truth is there are very few people who have built H23 turbos, and I know of no one with firsthand experience as to how strong the internals are. Honda tends to make the internals stronger as RPM limit drops (because they no longer need to be so light), and in that regard there are other DOHC non-VTEC Honda motors running 20 psi on the stock internals without encountering problems (thus far). It's a commonly held notion that anything remotely nearing 10psi of boost requires a built motor, and its also a false one. A friend of mine ran at least 12psi on a stock B16A for 2 years and never had a problem (his daily driver too), when he did finally smoke the motor (which had nothing to do with the boost) he built it up, dropped the compression, and regretted it dearly. Less power, less response, less fun AND he spent more money in the process. If you're just planning to run 8psi of boost, and you don't abuse the motor all day long, there's no really compelling reason to build it up IMO. You just have to know the limits of driving a turbocharged Honda, which means basically use it once in a while, but not constantly. Not even a built bottom end will handle constant flogging, the heat involved will still cause a meltdown.
And no, you won't be running low 12's on such a setup. That will require about 350-400hp on 4th gen Prelude, which wouldn't be found until 15-18psi on an H23. You should fairly easily run high 5 second 0-60 times though. You'll be looking at around 220-250hp to the wheels with 8-10 psi of well tuned boost. Of course all of this is just my opinion, I could be wrong.
Arch-Angel- Actually I never said you needed pistons, the honest truth is there are very few people who have built H23 turbos, and I know of no one with firsthand experience as to how strong the internals are. Honda tends to make the internals stronger as RPM limit drops (because they no longer need to be so light), and in that regard there are other DOHC non-VTEC Honda motors running 20 psi on the stock internals without encountering problems (thus far). It's a commonly held notion that anything remotely nearing 10psi of boost requires a built motor, and its also a false one. A friend of mine ran at least 12psi on a stock B16A for 2 years and never had a problem (his daily driver too), when he did finally smoke the motor (which had nothing to do with the boost) he built it up, dropped the compression, and regretted it dearly. Less power, less response, less fun AND he spent more money in the process. If you're just planning to run 8psi of boost, and you don't abuse the motor all day long, there's no really compelling reason to build it up IMO. You just have to know the limits of driving a turbocharged Honda, which means basically use it once in a while, but not constantly. Not even a built bottom end will handle constant flogging, the heat involved will still cause a meltdown.
And no, you won't be running low 12's on such a setup. That will require about 350-400hp on 4th gen Prelude, which wouldn't be found until 15-18psi on an H23. You should fairly easily run high 5 second 0-60 times though. You'll be looking at around 220-250hp to the wheels with 8-10 psi of well tuned boost. Of course all of this is just my opinion, I could be wrong.
#23
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Land Down, Under, Australia
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Rod question (texan)
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this topic!! It has given me a lot to think about. I know I am only a newb, but all the info helps.
Ok, so just to make sure we are on the same level here...
My plan is to go for a 9:1 CR with new pistons, and use a T3 turbo with a custom exhaust mani ( I am sure it would be too much trouble to try to find a prefab one here)
The aim is to run 10psi, and keep the stock clutch, fuel pump, injectors and oil/water feeders (till I can afford a better ones!)
I want to get a new computer, and will probably go for a Power FC. (No one can tune Hondata down here).
How does this sound? Not exactly high performance, but I just want her to hold together, while having a bit of fun.
Ok, so just to make sure we are on the same level here...
My plan is to go for a 9:1 CR with new pistons, and use a T3 turbo with a custom exhaust mani ( I am sure it would be too much trouble to try to find a prefab one here)
The aim is to run 10psi, and keep the stock clutch, fuel pump, injectors and oil/water feeders (till I can afford a better ones!)
I want to get a new computer, and will probably go for a Power FC. (No one can tune Hondata down here).
How does this sound? Not exactly high performance, but I just want her to hold together, while having a bit of fun.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JalopySiR
Forced Induction
25
07-03-2005 06:02 PM