low compression before turbo??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2005 | 05:57 PM
  #1  
jdmstreethatch's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: Evansville, IN, USA
Default low compression before turbo??

Im about to pick up a usdm b18c1 gsr swap. the motor has 95K on it so I'm going to go ahead and put new pistons, rods, and rings in it while its out on a stand. Im planning to go turbo down the road, maybe 6 months. I want to use some forged pistons between 9.5-9.8:1 compression and I was wondering how much power I'm gonna loose from running low compression on a stock gs-r motor. Is it gonna be REALLY slow? The motor also has CTR cams, will they work well with the low compression before i boost it??


thanks
chris
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2005 | 07:10 PM
  #2  
cnydc2's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
From: The Burn, NY, USA
Default Re: low compression before turbo?? (jdmstreethatch)

It is going to be very, very slow and very unresponsive. The engine will pick up rpms very slowly. I would recommend turbo then build.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2005 | 07:12 PM
  #3  
USDM 4G VTEC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,834
Likes: 1
From: OH
Default Re: low compression before turbo?? (cnydc2)

i lowered the compression on my engine before i went turbo
and i notice not big power loss... drove the same as before... as a matter of fact, a bit more torque on low end
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2005 | 07:37 PM
  #4  
_entropy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Default Re: low compression before turbo?? (cnydc2)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cnydc2 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It is going to be very, very slow and very unresponsive. The engine will pick up rpms very slowly. I would recommend turbo then build. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Way to not have a god damn clue what you're talking about This is good as a foreign Math prof trying to help you with your english work. God, I get sick and tired of people chirping in when they don't have any first hand experience, and when they're just going by the **** they heard on here.

10:1 - 9.8:1 is .2:1 of a point drop in compression. For a FULL point in compression you're looking at around a 3% drop in power, so that 170 HP GSR will be putting out around 165 horsepower at 9:1 compression. If you think you're going to notice a 1 horsepower drop, you're lying to yourself. For that matter, if you think you're really even going to notice the drop from 10:1 to 9:1, you are also lying to yourself. On the street there is no discernable difference in throttle response between 10:1 and 9:1, and power feels almost exactly the same.

My motor is currently sitting at a little over 10:1 compression, and if I had to do it again for a street motor I would do 9:1, no questions asked. As a matter of fact, I found a set of 9:1 Wiseco's for cheap, and it's really tempting to buy them and swap em out.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2005 | 09:52 PM
  #5  
PrettyLude's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,493
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, LA, USA
Default Re: low compression before turbo?? (USDM 4G VTEC)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by USDM 4G VTEC &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i lowered the compression on my engine before i went turbo
and i notice not big power loss... drove the same as before... as a matter of fact, a bit more torque on low end</TD></TR></TABLE>

i didn't notice that much of a difference either, i was still smoking civic si's
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2005 | 10:50 PM
  #6  
jdmstreethatch's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: Evansville, IN, USA
Default

cool thats really good news, thanks.

anything else i should replace while i have it all apart??
It has a clutch masters stage II clutch already.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2005 | 07:00 AM
  #7  
cnydc2's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
From: The Burn, NY, USA
Default Re: low compression before turbo?? (Napoleon Dynamite)

In my GS-R I have 9.0:1 Comp pistons, I blew an intercooler line off and the car became extremely slow. It was very unresponsive, maybe everyones car reacts different, I don't know. I would eat my brothers BMW with boost without I had no chance, so please don't tell me I know what I am talking about. Maybe It was the turbo in the exhaust disrupting flow, or I was running entirely too rich w/o boost,I don't know. I don't need to get flamed b/c my car reacted diff than yours, have you ever ran 9.0:1 n/a?
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2005 | 07:44 AM
  #8  
_entropy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Default Re: low compression before turbo?? (cnydc2)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cnydc2 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">In my GS-R I have 9.0:1 Comp pistons, I blew an intercooler line off and the car became extremely slow. It was very unresponsive, maybe everyones car reacts different, I don't know. I would eat my brothers BMW with boost without I had no chance, so please don't tell me I know what I am talking about. Maybe It was the turbo in the exhaust disrupting flow, or I was running entirely too rich w/o boost,I don't know. I don't need to get flamed b/c my car reacted diff than yours, have you ever ran 9.0:1 n/a? </TD></TR></TABLE>

Blowing off an intercooler hose and still driving the car hard is not only
A) Entirely retarded because you can destroy your turbo, but
B) Nothing close to an indication of how it would perform naturally aspirated.

See how small that turbine housing is? Pretty damn restrictive. Yes, I have had actual experience driving a 9:1 car with a header and a normal exhaust system on it. Feels basically exactly the same as my 10:1 car does.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2005 | 08:44 AM
  #9  
ChillOutWayne's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 1
From: Blown, il, usa
Default Re: low compression before turbo?? (Napoleon Dynamite)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Napoleon Dynamite &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Way to not have a god damn clue what you're talking about This is good as a foreign Math prof trying to help you with your english work. God, I get sick and tired of people chirping in when they don't have any first hand experience, and when they're just going by the **** they heard on here.

10:1 - 9.8:1 is .2:1 of a point drop in compression. For a FULL point in compression you're looking at around a 3% drop in power, so that 170 HP GSR will be putting out around 165 horsepower at 9:1 compression. If you think you're going to notice a 1 horsepower drop, you're lying to yourself. For that matter, if you think you're really even going to notice the drop from 10:1 to 9:1, you are also lying to yourself. On the street there is no discernable difference in throttle response between 10:1 and 9:1, and power feels almost exactly the same.

My motor is currently sitting at a little over 10:1 compression, and if I had to do it again for a street motor I would do 9:1, no questions asked. As a matter of fact, I found a set of 9:1 Wiseco's for cheap, and it's really tempting to buy them and swap em out.</TD></TR></TABLE>

This is very accurate. I had my GSR bored to 81.5mm and ran CP 9:1 pistons for 6 months before boosting, and noticed no difference at all in driveability, acceleration, revving, nothing. Car ran just as before, if not better.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2005 | 09:21 AM
  #10  
dornon13's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga, TN
Default Re: low compression before turbo?? (cnydc2)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cnydc2 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">In my GS-R I have 9.0:1 Comp pistons, I blew an intercooler line off and the car became extremely slow. It was very unresponsive, maybe everyones car reacts different, I don't know. I would eat my brothers BMW with boost without I had no chance, so please don't tell me I know what I am talking about. Maybe It was the turbo in the exhaust disrupting flow, or I was running entirely too rich w/o boost,I don't know. I don't need to get flamed b/c my car reacted diff than yours, have you ever ran 9.0:1 n/a? </TD></TR></TABLE>

yeah dude that turbo was restricting the **** out of your engine..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
90teg
Forced Induction
31
Nov 22, 2017 07:02 PM
MyEGisBad
Forced Induction
3
Jan 19, 2011 10:12 AM
scUba-stEve
Forced Induction
3
Apr 2, 2005 06:23 PM
Doug684
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
5
Dec 30, 2003 09:59 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:54 PM.