Long time no Post
09-06-2006, 06:06 PM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Long time no Post
hey guys. Been a while since my post. heres some recent things
hit my best time so far 12.8@112mpg slick. 13.4@110 on street tires (spinning)
hit my best time so far 12.8@112mpg slick. 13.4@110 on street tires (spinning)
09-09-2006, 06:14 AM
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: (aaro-boost)
(quick run down)
b18b aebs sleeves. 84mm spec
weisco pistons 9.0:1
eagle h beam rods
5 angle intake 3 angle exhust head job
full race cam gears adj.
skunk2 mani
3" dp to 14" resonator and 3" exhaust pipes to Magniflow muffler
super tech dual valve springs and tianium retainers
crp equal lenght mani
garrett t3/04e57 trim
Ls tranny w/ quaif lsd
island motorsport 500 hp axles
full race traction bar.
hasport mounts.
335whp 300 tq tuned by jeff evans w/ neptun
the fuel line from the filter to the rail I had custom made @ a local shop.
b18b aebs sleeves. 84mm spec
weisco pistons 9.0:1
eagle h beam rods
5 angle intake 3 angle exhust head job
full race cam gears adj.
skunk2 mani
3" dp to 14" resonator and 3" exhaust pipes to Magniflow muffler
super tech dual valve springs and tianium retainers
crp equal lenght mani
garrett t3/04e57 trim
Ls tranny w/ quaif lsd
island motorsport 500 hp axles
full race traction bar.
hasport mounts.
335whp 300 tq tuned by jeff evans w/ neptun
the fuel line from the filter to the rail I had custom made @ a local shop.
Trending Topics
09-09-2006, 10:22 AM
#8
official honda whore
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: not tellin you where, pa, usa
Posts: 8,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (BigStu)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BigStu »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">(quick run down)
335whp 300 tq tuned by jeff evans w/ neptun
the fuel line from the filter to the rail I had custom made @ a local shop.</TD></TR></TABLE>
thats weird that you put down that much power but yet only trapped 110 with street tires, i was trapping around 110-112 with my built 81.5mm ls that i supposedly only put down 210whp with.... and all that in my full weight 95 ls, making me think that either evans dyno reads high or the dyno i went to read really low
nice times btw
335whp 300 tq tuned by jeff evans w/ neptun
the fuel line from the filter to the rail I had custom made @ a local shop.</TD></TR></TABLE>
thats weird that you put down that much power but yet only trapped 110 with street tires, i was trapping around 110-112 with my built 81.5mm ls that i supposedly only put down 210whp with.... and all that in my full weight 95 ls, making me think that either evans dyno reads high or the dyno i went to read really low
nice times btw
09-14-2006, 01:11 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (BigStu)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by urbansi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I wouldnt call that an Ultimate sleeper...
Now this i would call a sleeper. 706whp!
</TD></TR></TABLE>
That car is in a class by it's self.
Now this i would call a sleeper. 706whp!
</TD></TR></TABLE>That car is in a class by it's self.
09-14-2006, 03:38 PM
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago area, us
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (BigStu)
Was that 1.9 60' on a slick? if so thats also not that impressive considering i have done better on stock suspension and a drag radial...
I am really not trying to be an *** i am just wondering why 335whp wont go faster than 12.8 (while the trap speed does say something), expecially on a slick, there really isnt wheel spin to blame for the most part.
Either way nice looking car, clean too.
I am really not trying to be an *** i am just wondering why 335whp wont go faster than 12.8 (while the trap speed does say something), expecially on a slick, there really isnt wheel spin to blame for the most part.
Either way nice looking car, clean too.
09-14-2006, 04:36 PM
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 7,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (SPNFEDEH)
Times do seem off for the power level. Even for a coupe. Should be trapping a lot higher than 112. Well not a lot, you know what im saying lol.
09-14-2006, 06:02 PM
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Right Here, MI, world
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (boostedej1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BigStu »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hey guys. Been a while since my post. heres some recent things
hit my best time so far 12.8@112mpg slick. 13.4@110 on street tires (spinning)
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I wish i could get that kinda mileage outta my turbo dammmmnnnnnn!!! j/k
I don't know, nice car, i went 13.003 @ 109 mph, on street tires. But that was a eg hatch weighing in at 2200 lbs with me in it. So i guess depends on his weight, and someone mentioned trans.
My buddie, hatch too, with a b16 vs my d16, i was runnnig 5 more psi, and he was killing me when i shifted to fourth and that was with my si tranny. So, that could have a huge effect too.
hit my best time so far 12.8@112mpg slick. 13.4@110 on street tires (spinning)
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I wish i could get that kinda mileage outta my turbo dammmmnnnnnn!!! j/k
I don't know, nice car, i went 13.003 @ 109 mph, on street tires. But that was a eg hatch weighing in at 2200 lbs with me in it. So i guess depends on his weight, and someone mentioned trans.
My buddie, hatch too, with a b16 vs my d16, i was runnnig 5 more psi, and he was killing me when i shifted to fourth and that was with my si tranny. So, that could have a huge effect too.
09-15-2006, 09:03 AM
#23
ME LOVE U LONG TIME
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (qfast817)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by qfast817 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nice hatch 
</TD></TR></TABLE>
too bad its a coupe man!!!!!!!!!!!!!
</TD></TR></TABLE>too bad its a coupe man!!!!!!!!!!!!!
09-15-2006, 04:54 PM
#24
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
hehe....thanks for the compliments, critiqueing, & modest understatements lol.
I actually do belive I should be faster with the slicks. It was my 1st run out there with slicks and wasnt really hammering off the line. Still have the "chills" from destroying my last diff and having to pay for a $500 flatbed home.
I plan on upgrading to a gt35r install my cranes stage 2 cams and retune for more power. I actally met a guy w/ a coupe ls turbo running 11.8 w/ slicks (not sure of his mph)and his car was only slightly lighter than mine and i believe making allittle less power. Guess i need to work on the lauching part and get the times down.
thanks for replys
I actually do belive I should be faster with the slicks. It was my 1st run out there with slicks and wasnt really hammering off the line. Still have the "chills" from destroying my last diff and having to pay for a $500 flatbed home.
I plan on upgrading to a gt35r install my cranes stage 2 cams and retune for more power. I actally met a guy w/ a coupe ls turbo running 11.8 w/ slicks (not sure of his mph)and his car was only slightly lighter than mine and i believe making allittle less power. Guess i need to work on the lauching part and get the times down.
thanks for replys
