Largest intercooler on a honda
Smarter than you
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,240
Likes: 2
From: Third Coast, united states
Get the Precision core model #- AA1129
27.80 X 12.75 X 5.00
Good for 1775hp
Should be able to make it fit.
http://www.precisionturbo.net/...er=no
27.80 X 12.75 X 5.00
Good for 1775hp
Should be able to make it fit.

http://www.precisionturbo.net/...er=no
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mrbsponge »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">heres mine works pretty well compared to my old DRAG model
</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol, that one just looks way too big.
lol, that one just looks way too big.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by -iLLuZioN-B18C1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
lol, that one just looks way too big.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i really mean no offense to you or your car but jesus christ thats huge.
if i was you i would go and find a section of the bumper you cut out"rigght near the top" and fit that witha piece of another bumper with a bunch of little holes in it"for air flow" but it looks really awkward with out that part of the bumper.but either way it still looks nice.
lol, that one just looks way too big.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i really mean no offense to you or your car but jesus christ thats huge.
if i was you i would go and find a section of the bumper you cut out"rigght near the top" and fit that witha piece of another bumper with a bunch of little holes in it"for air flow" but it looks really awkward with out that part of the bumper.but either way it still looks nice.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DIRep972 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">lol. at least it would look cool! go big or go home.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
haha.that's funny ****.
</TD></TR></TABLE>haha.that's funny ****.
If I see one more retard using a ******* intercooler that is almost as wide and wall as the entire front of their car I am going to **** on it if I see it. Why do you want to lose efficiency? Use the proper sized IC for your application please. 300whp does NOT require a huge IC and you will NOT benefit from it. Infact you will lose performance.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Blazin Civic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> If I see one more retard using a ******* intercooler that is almost as wide and wall as the entire front of their car I am going to **** on it if I see it. Why do you want to lose efficiency? Use the proper sized IC for your application please. 300whp does NOT require a huge IC and you will NOT benefit from it. Infact you will lose performance.</TD></TR></TABLE>
none of us have wimpy 300 hp cars.my last car put down 500 + and my kia is easily pushing 600 whp.the proffesor will most definitly hit the 1000 mark
none of us have wimpy 300 hp cars.my last car put down 500 + and my kia is easily pushing 600 whp.the proffesor will most definitly hit the 1000 mark
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 0
From: not riding any bandwagons in, massachusetts, usa
unfortunately all these huge cores arent doing as much as your hoping. airflow doesnt make a 90 degree turn, travel 10 more inches, then make another 90 to get to the upper rows without some help.
just lots of turbulence in there. the tanks are all wrong.
just lots of turbulence in there. the tanks are all wrong.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1025699
this is the exact same one on that car. it's still for sale
this is the exact same one on that car. it's still for sale
well most of us like homey said up there get the big intercoolers ofr the bling factor..........i know for exxperience mine (the green hatch above) works better than my DRAG model just by hondata IAT temps. sometimes it is about heat soak level which is what a larger surafce area is for, hence a 1g DSM sidemount being heat wshed by 3rd gear.
and to whoever said air wont turn this-a-way and that-a-way, cmon, look at the side to side and top to bottom intercoolers, i would like to say that it will, it will do what ever it is pushed to do, and in a boosted situation, it will fill an intercooler.
and yes i make more than 300 hp
and to whoever said air wont turn this-a-way and that-a-way, cmon, look at the side to side and top to bottom intercoolers, i would like to say that it will, it will do what ever it is pushed to do, and in a boosted situation, it will fill an intercooler.
and yes i make more than 300 hp
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 0
From: not riding any bandwagons in, massachusetts, usa
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mrbsponge »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
and to whoever said air wont turn this-a-way and that-a-way, cmon, look at the side to side and top to bottom intercoolers, i would like to say that it will, it will do what ever it is pushed to do, and in a boosted situation, it will fill an intercooler.
and yes i make more than 300 hp</TD></TR></TABLE>
if you mean that air will go in and air will go out, then i wont argue. if you mean to say that adding row upon row without altering the tanks is efficient, i will disagree. im not qualified to explain the intricate details to anyone as i struggle to understand them, but fluid flow is very complex and not really related to common sense as much as we would like. i certainly wish it was a 'bigger is better' situation.
here is a summary of a fluid dynamics course that i often refer to. i think its pretty good if you care to look.
http://www.efm.leeds.ac.uk/CIV....html
and to whoever said air wont turn this-a-way and that-a-way, cmon, look at the side to side and top to bottom intercoolers, i would like to say that it will, it will do what ever it is pushed to do, and in a boosted situation, it will fill an intercooler.
and yes i make more than 300 hp</TD></TR></TABLE>
if you mean that air will go in and air will go out, then i wont argue. if you mean to say that adding row upon row without altering the tanks is efficient, i will disagree. im not qualified to explain the intricate details to anyone as i struggle to understand them, but fluid flow is very complex and not really related to common sense as much as we would like. i certainly wish it was a 'bigger is better' situation.
here is a summary of a fluid dynamics course that i often refer to. i think its pretty good if you care to look.
http://www.efm.leeds.ac.uk/CIV....html
that core sizing isnt that bad except for the thickness. maybe if it was 3" thick, then it would be worth it.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DIRep972 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Get the Precision core model #- AA1129
27.80 X 12.75 X 5.00
Good for 1775hp
Should be able to make it fit.
http://www.precisionturbo.net/...er=no
</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DIRep972 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Get the Precision core model #- AA1129
27.80 X 12.75 X 5.00
Good for 1775hp
Should be able to make it fit.

http://www.precisionturbo.net/...er=no
</TD></TR></TABLE>
the intercooler on my car is perfect. it looks big but my AIT temperatures never goes about 77 degrees. Any yes I my pushing over 300whp. He is a picture of what my car looks like with the bumper on. This was before I painted the intercooler black. this is the same 00 black SI from page 2
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by -iLLuZioN-B18C1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">lol, that one just looks way too big.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Those pictures are deceiving
It doesnt look that big in person. Dont get me wrong. It's big but not as big as it looks in those pictures.
Those pictures are deceiving
It doesnt look that big in person. Dont get me wrong. It's big but not as big as it looks in those pictures.





[/QUOTE]That sure is one sexy bitch!