how would this do on a poor mans type r?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 10:13 PM
  #1  
rough_draft's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
From: dirty asia
Default how would this do on a poor mans type r?

gsr block with itr pistons, b16 head with b16 cams. a garret t3/t4 57 trim .63 a/r 4 bolt with stage3 wheel. i'm thinking 6-8 psi max because of the high compression (10.6). what kind of power could i put down? i would be very happy with anything over 250whp. My intercooler of choice is a johhny race car 6 inch and i ahve a 3inch downpipe. it will prolly be open dp until i can afford a 3inch exhaust. injectors will be dsm 450cc, fuel pump will be upgraded to walbro and tuning will be p28 with uberdata or crome(? can't decide? dont know). PLease critique my setup. thank you
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 10:44 PM
  #2  
rough_draft's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
From: dirty asia
Default

anyone know where i can buy a thicker headgasket to lower compression a few points? thanks and bump
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 11:04 PM
  #3  
adseguy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,992
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN, U.S.A
Default Re: (Lmaonade)

don't limit yourself on PSI alone. limit yourself on WHP because that is the determining factor to a long lasting and safe engine. Why do you want to lower compression....do you even know why? All it means is the margin from peak power to detonation is smaller, but if you get a good tuner you will be just fine. Go get a tuner adn talk with him
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 11:15 PM
  #4  
rough_draft's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
From: dirty asia
Default Re: (adseguy)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by adseguy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">don't limit yourself on PSI alone. limit yourself on WHP because that is the determining factor to a long lasting and safe engine. Why do you want to lower compression....do you even know why? All it means is the margin from peak power to detonation is smaller, but if you get a good tuner you will be just fine. Go get a tuner adn talk with him </TD></TR></TABLE>

thanks for the input, the reason i want to lower is that there will be more room for error tuning wise. thats why i can't decide if i want to go wtih crome or uberdata 1.7. I would like to tune with hondata or aem ems but funds do not permit. thanks for the input though do you think 260ish or so is reasonable with that turbo? thanks
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 05:49 AM
  #5  
Erik B's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne, WY, USA
Default

I ran something close to your setup in my type R.

T3/T4 60 trim .63 ar housing stage 3 wheel
Vortech 12.1 FMU
VAFC
OBD1
GSR cams

It made 254whp (tuned by Tony1) at 5psi. Stock compression, headgasket, etc.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 08:30 AM
  #6  
adseguy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,992
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN, U.S.A
Default Re: (Erik B)

yeah you'l make your 260whp pretty easily. Uberdata/Crome/Hondata all work the same way and control ignition and fuel in the same manner so I would personally stick with the free ones!

Although the tuner can't change the margin of safety he can make it go to the safer side and not opt for peak power, which is just fine.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 08:34 AM
  #7  
rough_draft's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
From: dirty asia
Default

thanks for the input, would you guys suggest the 57 trim or the 54?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 08:35 AM
  #8  
adseguy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,992
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN, U.S.A
Default Re: (Lmaonade)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Lmaonade &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thanks for the input, would you guys suggest the 57 trim or the 54?</TD></TR></TABLE>

not much difference. If you want quicker spool go for a .48 A/R on the turbine side
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 08:57 AM
  #9  
rough_draft's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
From: dirty asia
Default

i have been told that the .48 a/r is a lil too small.. would this be suitable for my goals and my motor? i dont want it to fall off on the top end. I plan on buying my turbo from camp1320 and i can chose T3/T4E .50, .54 , .57, .60 trim compressor 4 bolt stage 3 .48 or .63 a/r.

I was thinking 54 or 57 trim and .63 a/r but idk. what do you suggest?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 09:35 AM
  #10  
Erik B's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne, WY, USA
Default

man at boost levels as low as what you are planning for you won't see ANY lag what so ever. My 60 trim was great....with the comp being that high it'll help your low end and you wont see ANY lag..trust me.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AcroSilme
Forced Induction
14
Apr 11, 2016 09:35 AM
97_coupe
Forced Induction
11
Feb 21, 2008 07:02 AM
polska11111
Forced Induction
8
Dec 24, 2007 09:59 AM
hotimportcrx
Forced Induction
2
Mar 5, 2005 05:08 PM
teamrocket si
Forced Induction
4
Feb 26, 2002 06:43 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:40 PM.