So after getting all my turbo parts installed went to the dyno today
heres my setup

stock b16a3
full race stage 2 kit
t3-60-1
3 inch down pipe to 2 1/2 inch exhaust for right now
precision 780 injectors
tuned on crome

hp 281
torque 197

[URL]


lemme know what ya think

 

Looks like it was tuned pretty rich, also what boost was this at?

 

10 psi
tuner said he tuned it a lil rich due to it being stock and running that much boost to be a bit safer

 

Thats alittle too rich imo, but u still made good power

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SpdFrk &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Thats alittle too rich imo, but u still made good power </TD></TR></TABLE>

Agreed...

Anything in the 10range is rich imo, dipping below 10's is wasting fuel. Especially @ sub 300whp.

 

I agree a little to rich. true it is better safe than sorry but lets say 11:5:1 to 12:1:1
is still very safe youll make a little more power and your gas mileage will improve. Just make shure you dont go nuts with the timing.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gunslinger &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I agree a little to rich. true it is better safe than sorry but lets say 11:5:1 to 12:1:1
is still very safe youll make a little more power and your gas mileage will improve. Just make shure you dont go nuts with the timing. </TD></TR></TABLE>

 

Good numbers on a Mustang dyno

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dunkd &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Good numbers on a Mustang dyno </TD></TR></TABLE>

should do 11's with hook in a light chassis.

 

i think people are taking these conservative tunes way to far. isnt there a point where it starts to hurt the engine due to too much fuel. correct me if im wrong but anything richer than like 11.4-11.5 is pretty much pointless.

 

edit: drunk posting....not reading numbers correctly.

Lean it out a little and you will be good


Modified by SOHC_MShue at 11:56 AM 12/30/2006

 

not bad

 

Looks like you made decent numbers! It does look like it is running rich... I guess this tuner goes by the saying "I rather be Safe then Sorry!"

 

I really dont know, but a 60-1 in a full rce kit should make more than that at 10psi

 

I think it should have as well.

Heres my Turbonetics 60-1 @ 7psi

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 93supercoupe &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I really dont know, but a 60-1 in a full rce kit should make more than that at 10psi</TD></TR></TABLE>

also car is on a mustang dyno.. dynojet #'s would be higher

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by T4eg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

also car is on a mustang dyno.. dynojet #'s would be higher</TD></TR></TABLE>

x2
Im running pretty much the same set-up but I believe I was around 290-295ish on 10psi on a super safe tune(timing wise) But good numbers man

 

thanks

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by juda7 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think it should have as well.

Heres my Turbonetics 60-1 @ 7psi

</TD></TR></TABLE>

and you have a GSR motor right? This is on a 1.6, car is def right where it should be...

 

It is a little fat from atmospheric pressure to about 4psi. After that i thiink it is ok by looking at how smooth the torque curve is. Fuel density in just as important as air density. There is nothing wrong with running that rich on pump *** if the combustion is clean. I would lean it out a little before peak torque to help response and spool time.

Then again, im drunk and live in utah so I dont know much.

It looks lik you have a stock B16 intake manifold, ive seen that same curve about 20 times. lol