Garrett 57 trim .63ar vs Borg Warner 57 trim .55ar on stock B18B1
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Garrett 57 trim .63ar vs Borg Warner 57 trim .55ar on stock B18B1
I am trying to make my decision between a Garrett 57 trim w/ .63ar or a Borg warner .55ar, I am going to be running it on a completely stock B18B1 at about 10 psi. My goals are around 200-250hp I was wondering if the Borg warner will spool up faster than the Garrett. I tried looking for people running the borg warner turbo but i couldnt find much about it. I was planning on wither getting a Garrett 57 trim w/ .48 a/r or .63a/r but now that i found the borg warner w/ .55a/r it seems like it might be a good option. pretty much i'm looking for the most perfect turbo for my set up.
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: poopfacepartytime, ca, usa
Posts: 5,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (mike93eh2)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mike93eh2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you dont need a turbo that big if youre goals are only 200hp</TD></TR></TABLE>
hell you dont even need a turbo if your goals are 200
hell you dont even need a turbo if your goals are 200
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: missouri
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (blinx9900)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blinx9900 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
hell you dont even need a turbo if your goals are 200</TD></TR></TABLE>
LOL, good point.
hell you dont even need a turbo if your goals are 200</TD></TR></TABLE>
LOL, good point.
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Quakertown,pa
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (98-DC4)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98-DC4 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">im not trying to make 200hp more like around 250. i only said 200-250 because i dont want crazy power.</TD></TR></TABLE>then why would want to turbo you car then?i don't get it you can make 300 on stock ls motor with the right set up.200-250 you might as well look into all motor.
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (HondaCivicSiR1)
im not going to make 250 hp with a b18b all motor for the price of a full turbo setup. I am looking for a somewhat relieble street car and go bigger later on. I dont want to do a swap either.
Trending Topics
#8
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Re: (98-DC4)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98-DC4 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">im not going to make 250 hp with a b18b all motor for the price of a full turbo setup. I am looking for a somewhat relieble street car and go bigger later on. I dont want to do a swap either.</TD></TR></TABLE>
In this case, I would use the Garrett 50 trim, not even the 57 trim turbocharger, reason being that the BW unit uses a much larger exhaust wheel than the Garrett model. Especially for those goals. If your budget can afford a little more the GT3251 could work as well.
In this case, I would use the Garrett 50 trim, not even the 57 trim turbocharger, reason being that the BW unit uses a much larger exhaust wheel than the Garrett model. Especially for those goals. If your budget can afford a little more the GT3251 could work as well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post