do i need datalogging?
#2
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Posts: 3,961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: do i need datalogging? (1.8)
I would say that if you are planning on racing the car on the track and you want to know what the car is doing, then yes I would get it. If you are not worried about it, and just want to go off of what your tuner tells you, then you won't need datalogging. Datalogging basically allows you to log air intake temps, timing, pounds of boost, redline, etc. which is beneficial to those on the track so they can make adjustments accordingly.
#3
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: lost...
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: do i need datalogging? (Bulldogg83)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bulldogg83 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I would say that if you are planning on racing the car on the track and you want to know what the car is doing, then yes I would get it. If you are not worried about it, and just want to go off of what your tuner tells you, then you won't need datalogging. Datalogging basically allows you to log air intake temps, timing, pounds of boost, redline, etc. which is beneficial to those on the track so they can make adjustments accordingly. </TD></TR></TABLE>
when you say "log", u mean in a computer?
when you say "log", u mean in a computer?
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: do i need datalogging? (1.8)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1.8 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
when you say "log", u mean in a computer?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Your are correct.
when you say "log", u mean in a computer?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Your are correct.
#6
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Posts: 3,961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: do i need datalogging? (1.8)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1.8 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">basically, i'm better off with S100 since i'm not tuning anything by myself?
S100=tune by tuner
S200=tune by self or tuner
?</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah you would be fine with the s100.
S100=tune by tuner
S200=tune by self or tuner
?</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah you would be fine with the s100.
Trending Topics
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: do i need datalogging? (1.8)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1.8 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">u guys tune it yourself or have someone else tune?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I have kpro...basically same thing. I use my datalogging quite a bit. Just to make sure everything is going well under boost while at the track.
I had mine tuned by the guys at VSV in Dallas, Texas
If I adjust anything, it's maybe ignition when/if I put higher octane at the track.
I have kpro...basically same thing. I use my datalogging quite a bit. Just to make sure everything is going well under boost while at the track.
I had mine tuned by the guys at VSV in Dallas, Texas
If I adjust anything, it's maybe ignition when/if I put higher octane at the track.
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Re: do i need datalogging? (02SilverSiHB)
Dataloggin is now standard with Hondata (well, with the s200)! Check out the link: http://www.hondata.com/
#13
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA
Posts: 3,104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: do i need datalogging? (tub_sephiroth)
Go with the S200. Eventually if you ever decide you want to tune your car you can use the s200 while s100 you will need to upgrade.
That link is correct, s200s now come standard with datalogging.
to hondata for hooking us all up with that.
That link is correct, s200s now come standard with datalogging.
to hondata for hooking us all up with that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JSR3STS
Audio / Security / Video
8
11-06-2003 08:13 AM