i was jsut curious as to which one is gonna be more accurate at reading boost levels? because my boost guage which is tee'd off the fpr reads 11 psi when crome says my boost peaks at 7psi. the gauge is out of a guys srt-4 and it might be off a few psi cuz when my car is off the gauge reads a lil over 2. anyways, any help or input would be great

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 92eg6lsvtec &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i was jsut curious as to which one is gonna be more accurate at reading boost levels? because my boost guage which is tee'd off the fpr reads 11 psi when crome says my boost peaks at 7psi. the gauge is out of a guys srt-4 and it might be off a few psi cuz when my car is off the gauge reads a lil over 2. anyways, any help or input would be great</TD></TR></TABLE>

An engine managment system with a quality map sensor will be more accurate than a digital/analog guage every day of the week and twice on Sunday. GL.

 

im gonna say the gauge is bad.

 

yea. i really do think the gauge is bad. i ordered a new gauge that will be here anyday so i hope it reads a lil closer to what crome is saying. and prolly later this week putting on a motorola 2.5 bar map.

 

well..there ya go

 

Gl

 

new autometer phantom gauge in. reads same as crome. srt gauge was 4psi off. thats good news!

 

my defi and crome read different as well on my car it's not bad it's about 1 to 2 psi off