Notices

Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2002, 07:31 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
civicmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boulder, CO, USA
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost

OK, I know this is kinda a noob question, but here goes. Feel free to correct me anytime i go wrong.
The lower the compression ratio (8.5:1) the more lbs of boost you can run safely?
And if that's true, which makes more power: Lots of boost(22lbs) and low compression, or high compression 11:1 and above, and fewer lbs of boost?
sorry if this is a stupid question, but i hope u guys can help
thanks
Old 07-15-2002, 07:35 AM
  #2  
 
reXem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary, BC, Canada
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (civicmark)

Try these links

http://www.hondalife.com/articles/tu...ompression.htm

http://www.hondalife.com/effectivecompression.htm
Old 07-15-2002, 07:40 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
 
civicmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boulder, CO, USA
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (reXem)

ok, i basically knew everything that was on those site, and i know that high compression is much better, however i still didnt get my questions answered!
thanks anyways


[Modified by civicmark, 4:48 PM 7/15/2002]
Old 07-15-2002, 07:41 AM
  #4  
 
CovertFI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: lafayette, la, usa
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (reXem)

well the bottom line is more air+fuel = more power, but there is always a trade off from one thing to another. lower compression will give you more lag. higher compression will not allow you to boost as much. you just have to find what will suit your needs best.
Old 07-15-2002, 08:50 AM
  #5  
 
b18cya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Westminster, CO, USA
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (CovertFI)

now that i've read those two articles, I have the same questions that he posted at first...

Old 07-15-2002, 08:51 AM
  #6  
 
b18cya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Westminster, CO, USA
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (b18cya)

Civicmark, have you ever been to http://www.highaltitudeimports.com ? there is a good forum there to
Old 07-15-2002, 08:52 AM
  #7  
 
reXem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary, BC, Canada
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (b18cya)

Dunno how you guys missed it.....

Bottom line...a higher compression motor, pound for pound, will make more power, than a low compression motor
You just have to have the best tuning......
Old 07-15-2002, 09:43 AM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
 
boosted hybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (reXem)

I was running a built 11:1 b16a turbo, just sold that long block to build my next project. 2.0L gsr block, b16a head and 11.5:1 compression...turbo, daily driven. Ever since i switched from 9:1 to 11:1 I will never go underneath 11:1 compression. The entire rpm band is filled with power, transition into boost is awesome and its allows me to run larger turbos and have the same spool up time as smaller ones.
Old 07-15-2002, 10:03 AM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
 
apexii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EDITED, PA
Posts: 2,264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (civicmark)

I think heat becomes one of the most relevant factors. Efficiency also comes to mind.
Old 07-15-2002, 11:03 AM
  #10  
 
b18cya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Westminster, CO, USA
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (boosted hybrid)

I was running a built 11:1 b16a turbo, just sold that long block to build my next project. 2.0L gsr block, b16a head and 11.5:1 compression...turbo, daily driven. Ever since i switched from 9:1 to 11:1 I will never go underneath 11:1 compression. The entire rpm band is filled with power, transition into boost is awesome and its allows me to run larger turbos and have the same spool up time as smaller ones.
so, how much boost did you run on the b16a turbo? & what hp/tq did it produce?

a smaller turbo would suffice on a higher compression setup...allowing a lower boost threshold, quicker spool-up time, etc.

flow restriction causing heat at high rpm is the only problem i'd see with that setup.

a larger turbo could still be used because the high compression give you plenty of power before the turbo spools up

i'm just thinking out loud, so please correct me

on a high compression/lower boost setup there is actually less air volume going into the combustion chamber, correct?

this idea just threw a wrench into my turbo plans

so this goes back to the original question
"Which is better, high compression/low boost or low compression/high boost?"
Old 07-15-2002, 11:18 AM
  #11  
 
reXem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary, BC, Canada
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (b18cya)

I believe in the articles above the answer to that question is that there is no one that is truely better.....a low comp/high boost in the end will cost you less, be more reliable, and less risky.... high comp/low boost will cost more (due to tuning), make more power and overall perform better....they gave an example as to how much is needed to make up the lower compression....

A motor with a 10.0:1 static CR boosting 10psi
10psi/14.7psi = .68
.68 + 1 = 1.68
1.68 x 10 = 16.8 effective CR

A motor with an 8.5:1 static CR boosting 10psi
10psi/14.7psi = .68
.68 + 1 = 1.68
1.68 x 8.5 = 14.28 effective CR

Now tell me who is going to make more power? The higher CR motor, or the lower CR motor?

So, maybe add more boost to the lower CR motor, right? Wrong...

A motor with an 8.5:1 static CR boosting 13psi
13psi/14.7psi = .88
.88 + 1 = 1.88
1.88 x 8.5 = 15.98 effective CR

Now you see, even adding 3psi of boost, still does not equal the effective CR of the higher compression, lower boost motor.
Old 07-15-2002, 12:37 PM
  #12  
 
b18cya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Westminster, CO, USA
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (reXem)

what is the highest effective CR that can be run on pump gas?
Old 07-15-2002, 12:54 PM
  #13  
Honda-Tech Member
 
bretx0r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 6,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (civicmark)

high compression is better in any case, but you are more likely to blow up your motor running 13psi stock internals B18C vs B18B, and not all of us can afford to have a full blown drag car every day of the week.


[Modified by bretx0r, 9:55 PM 7/15/2002]
Old 07-15-2002, 01:20 PM
  #14  
 
b18cya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Westminster, CO, USA
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (bretx0r)

high compression is better in any case, but you are more likely to blow up your motor running 13psi stock internals B18C vs B18B, and not all of us can afford to have a full blown drag car every day of the week.


[Modified by bretx0r, 9:55 PM 7/15/2002]
however, at stock compression, the b18c1 will produce a lot more power at the same amount of boost. so we can turn the boost down until the power level evens out. now the boost isnt as likely to blow up the engine, and less fuel is required because the mass of air is less. higher octane fuel is needed tho, because of the CR
Old 07-15-2002, 01:22 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
 
civicmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boulder, CO, USA
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (reXem)

I dont know how i missed that, but thanks
Old 07-15-2002, 03:28 PM
  #16  
pub
Honda-Tech Member
 
pub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: DC Suburbs, USA
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (civicmark)

Yeah at a high C/R with a fully built engine I could only imagine your weakest link would be when the combustion starts to detonate. Race gas would most likely have to be used. I would love to have a high C/R and get the whole powerband, but for a daily driver, I sadly don't think it'll be my cup of tea for right now. Maybe a project auto-xer after I get out of college?!
Old 07-15-2002, 07:33 PM
  #17  
Honda-Tech Member
 
boosted hybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (b18cya)

I ran 8lbs on pump gas, 14lbs on race gas. I also use methanol injection as well to cool the combustion chamber down, as well as a huge spearco core.

I tuned the car myself on haltech, tuning is free for me. It doesnt take that much to tune a car, just general knowledge, a egt and wideband...and some dyno time.

I never got the car to the dyno. I just street wideband'd it, probably like 30-40hr of tuning. I would say over 300whp on 8lbs, and a bit over 400whp on 14lbs.

Heat is a good thing when it comes to spooling up turbo's. The more heat in the burnt gas, the faster the turbo will spool up.

As long as you run the high compression engine rich, and take out timing when its needed there is no reason its not as reliable as low compression engine.

I will never go back to low compression again.
Old 07-15-2002, 09:29 PM
  #18  
 
SimonsTeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (boosted hybrid)

this information is good to know, but on 91 octane pump gas, boosting 10 psi, how high of a compression can be run???
Old 07-22-2002, 09:05 AM
  #19  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Charlie Moua's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MN
Posts: 12,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (civicmark)

so what would be a medium #(cr) to go by? 9.1:1 or 10.5:1 in a B series motor daily driven?
Old 07-22-2002, 10:04 AM
  #20  
Honda-Tech Member
 
CheezeFrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,678
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost (boosted hybrid)

So how many gallons per mile did you get? :D
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
white2draccord
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002)
1
04-28-2008 03:26 AM
slowcrx954
Forced Induction
38
11-23-2006 07:49 AM
Silverbullet86
Forced Induction
1
02-10-2006 04:12 PM
TehMoonRulz
Forced Induction
11
05-16-2005 01:15 PM
thinkbrianthink bu
Forced Induction
32
10-13-2002 10:47 AM



Quick Reply: Compression ratio vs. lbs of boost



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:44 PM.