Cams....which are you using/what do you prefer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #1  
Schister66's Avatar
Thread Starter
Man U FTW
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default Cams....which are you using/what do you prefer?

Currently i am looking for a new set of cams for my stock motor turbo GSR. I'm going to be in the 325whp range once my exhaust is done and i get tuned. I'm looking for a very streetable cam...much like the ITRs.

Does anyone have any dyno graphs of any of these cams or experience with them? I'm leaning towards one already based on the expert advice of a close friend, but i want to know who else has used these cams.

Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 09:59 AM
  #2  
Schister66's Avatar
Thread Starter
Man U FTW
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

STOCK GSR : b17a and b18c1 (Chilled Cast Core)

INTAKE lift - 10.6 mm,duration - 230 @1mm
EXHAUST lift - 9.4mm, duration - 227@1mm


1. ITR/CTR (Chilled Cast Cores)

- STOCK 1997-1999 ITR ($500-580/price, ITR intake cam $250-290)

INTAKE lift - 11.5 mm, duration 240 @1mm
EXHAUST lift - 10.5mm, duration 235 @1mm


- STOCK CTR and 2000-2001 ITR (CTR intake cam $300-350)

INTAKE lift - 11.5 mm, duration 243 @1mm
EXHAUST lift - 10.5mm, duration 235 @1mm

AFTERMARKET CAMS (LISTED IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER)


2. Blox (no @1mm specs available)

( MSRP $750 US/price for Tuner Series not Competition Series, Chill Cast Cores )

http://www.bloxracing.com

- Type A , Tuner Series($450-535 US / price)

INTAKE lift - 11.7 mm, duration 247 @ 0.05 in.
EXHAUST lift - 10.7mm, duration 239 @0.05 in.

- Type B, Tuner Series ($450-540 US /price)

INTAKE lift - 12.4 mm, duration 266 @0.05 in.
EXHAUST lift - 12.0 mm, duration 266 @0.05 in.

- Type C, Competition Series ( $ 450 - 550 US/price)

INT 60 (240) 6.5 76 (304) 12.0 63 (252) 9.0 0.17
EXH 63 (252) 8.7 76 (304) 11.5 60 (240) 6.2 0.19

Primary, Vtec, and secondary lobes measured at .050â€

- Type HSL, Competition Series ($510-570 US /price)

INTAKE lift - 12.6 mm, duration 255 @0.05 in.
EXHAUST lift - 12.5 mm, duration 256 @0.05 in.


no available specs for Tuner Series Type HSL or Turbo, Competition Series Type B , 10124 Race, or Turbo yet.


3. Buddy Club

- Spec 3 Plus ($549 US / price)

INTAKE lift - 11.2 mm, duration 250 @1mm
EXHAUST lift - 11.5mm, duration 245 @1mm

- Spec 4 ($600 US /price)

INTAKE lift - 12.3 mm, duration 269 @1mm
EXHAUST lift - 11.8 mm, duration 274 @1mm


4. Cat from Europe ($485 US / price)

These 2501606 billet VTEC road racing cams come from the Euporean import scene and Cat are cam makers for some of the Honda British Touring Car Championship teams. They require a VTEC/fuel controller like the Apex VAFC for tuning the idle and have an aggressive ramp and more aggressive nonVTEC lobes, despite the relatively mild specs on the VTEC lobe. Thanks goes to Steve at Johnston Research & Performance for the info.

http://www.jrponline.com/

INTAKE lift - 11.1 mm, duration 242 @1mm
EXHAUST lift - 10.32mm, duration 240 @1mm

5. Crane Standard Tappet & Race Only Roller Follower Cams

The specs listed on the Crane Cams website are at 0.05 in. valve lift. Thanks to Dave Maxwell at Crane for forwarding the duration @1mm valve lift specs for the Stage 1 cams.

http://www.cranecams.com/import/avteccams.htm

- Stage 1 (part no. 2530010 - $773.33/price)

INTAKE lift- 11.6 mm, duration 243 @ 1mm
EXHAUST lift - 10.8mm, duration 237 @ 1mm

- Stage 2 (part no. 2530012)

INTAKE lift- 11.99 mm, duration 248 @ 0.05 in.
EXHAUST lift - 11.6 mm, duration 242 @0.05 in.

- Stage 3 (part no. 2530016)

INTAKE lift- 12.39 mm, duration 254 @ 0.05 in.
EXHAUST lift - 11.99 mm, duration 248 @ 0.05 in.

Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 10:13 AM
  #3  
tepid1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,357
Likes: 5
From: CT
Default Re: Cams....which are you using/what do you prefer? (Schister66)

I run CTR's. So far they are by far the best bang for the buck cam out there if you ask me. Plus they have the reliability of OEM hardware.

The rest of my head is complimented with Manley hardware and valves.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 11:27 AM
  #4  
boostedcivicsir's Avatar
Mr. Badwrench
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 14,146
Likes: 2
From: stranger in a strange land
Default Re: Cams....which are you using/what do you prefer? (tepid1)

if my head ever gets done i will be putting my maz cams back in.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #5  
Schister66's Avatar
Thread Starter
Man U FTW
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Mazworx cams are probably a little bit overkill for me, not to mention the price...
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 07:38 PM
  #6  
1158's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,591
Likes: 29
From: Burnination
Default

I swapped out my GSRs for CTRs and picked up 9 whp. But I like them better. On the graph I gained more area under the curve and decreased spool time by about 500 rpm. This is on an otherwise internally stock GSR with SC34 creeping between 8 and 9 psi. I think the difference between the CTRs and GSRs would become more pronounced as boost increases.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 07:49 PM
  #7  
vtec.dc2's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,112
Likes: 0
Default Re: (1158)

i prefer stock in my case itr..no cam gears stock everytning as far as head goes.. 315whp and 9k revs ftw 100k miles on the head.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 07:49 PM
  #8  
Boostedb20EH2's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
From: Ohio, Us
Default Re: (1158)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1158 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I swapped out my GSRs for CTRs and picked up 9 whp. But I like them better. On the graph I gained more area under the curve and decreased spool time by about 500 rpm. This is on an otherwise internally stock GSR with SC34 creeping between 8 and 9 psi. I think the difference between the CTRs and GSRs would become more pronounced as boost increases.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Like what better? You lost me.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 08:24 AM
  #9  
Schister66's Avatar
Thread Starter
Man U FTW
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

well i am hoping to find either 00-01 ITR or CTR cams and just swap them with stock cam gears...i know i'll see a gain, but it may not be as pronounced as it would be if i got the gears and dialed them in a little better....

still looking for a set though.....
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 10:46 AM
  #10  
Schister66's Avatar
Thread Starter
Man U FTW
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

what do you guys think about Blox Type B's with stock cam gears??
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 11:50 AM
  #11  
alpha's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 1
From: A Place in, Florida, USA
Default Re: Cams....which are you using/what do you prefer? (Schister66)

We have used Skunk2 Turbo's, Si's, CTR's, ITR's, GSR's and Crower 62404's on a non-vtec setup. The Skunk2 Turbo's were horrible. The Si's are what they are. The CTR and ITR's made the most power. And the GSR's were great if you didnt have access and/or money to CTR/ITR cams. On our EG I am going to try out a set of Mazworx V1 cams. Maybe do a comparison between them and the CTR's that are in the Integra
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 03:01 PM
  #12  
1158's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,591
Likes: 29
From: Burnination
Default Re: (Boostedb20EH2)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Boostedb20EH2 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Like what better? You lost me.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Sorry, didn't make that very clear. I like the CTRs better. I think I need to flow more air to notice large power gains sometimes seen from swapping in CTR cams for GSR cams. With the CTR cams the car feels quicker, revs quicker, and builds boost quicker.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 03:03 PM
  #13  
Schister66's Avatar
Thread Starter
Man U FTW
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

aren't the 00-01 ITR and CTR cams the same thing??

Also, aren't the changes between the 97-99 and the 00-01 cams marginally different for turbo setups??
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 01:12 AM
  #14  
bzyq2001's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: POLAND, POLAND
Default Re: Cams....which are you using/what do you prefer? (alpha)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by alpha &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">We have used Skunk2 Turbo's, Si's, CTR's, ITR's, GSR's and Crower 62404's on a non-vtec setup. The Skunk2 Turbo's were horrible. The Si's are what they are. The CTR and ITR's made the most power. And the GSR's were great if you didnt have access and/or money to CTR/ITR cams. On our EG I am going to try out a set of Mazworx V1 cams. Maybe do a comparison between them and the CTR's that are in the Integra</TD></TR></TABLE>

skunk2 turbo cams was stage1 or stage2 ??
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 02:11 AM
  #15  
almostboostedgsr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Schister66)

ive heard people using one itr intake cam and one gsr exhaust cam. Or is it the other way around.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ra GS-R
Acura Integra
14
Aug 10, 2007 03:50 PM
Mr.Fairlady
Acura Integra Type-R
2
May 30, 2002 11:21 PM
PnX-R
Acura Integra
7
Apr 25, 2002 09:28 PM
hybridreams
Hybrid / Engine Swaps
8
Feb 1, 2002 06:58 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:17 PM.