i was gonna do a restrictor setup on my turbo but i couldnt find the right fittings so i took it to my local race shop to get fittings and they told me dont use a restrictor . the -3an line already restricts it enough. its only a small t3/t4 turbo xs turbo but does anyone else do alright with no restrictor ?

 

As far as I have been told if its 3 an it doesnt need it only if its 4 an. I have been running my 3 with no fitting and have had no problems

 

ok . i assume they know what they are talking about since they are chris rados tech crew and build his race cars but well see.

 

Look just ask flamenco t and search and you will see what people tell you and as far as the sarcasm goes it isnt going to get you nowhere

 

3 AN here, never a problem. No restrictor needed, I will probably get one with the new setup for peace of mind.

 

3an here for about 4000miles

 

just wondering...

most restrictors i see are .06" at the opening...

a -3 line is about .1875" and a -4 line is .25"

if the person with the -4 is using a restrictor it goes down to .06

if a -3 uses it, its the same...

so does it matter if you have -4 or -3 and then run the restrictor... in the end its still coming out of a .06 opening..

i was just thinking, not stating a fact. if im wrong please let me know cuz i am wondering this

im running a -3 line and oil is starting to come out my compressor inlet and sometimes it smokes after long drives..

i about to buy one so if im wrong someone let me know

i dont wanna starve my turbo

 

I would think with the smaller line and the restrictor it would boost the pressure through the restrictor but I could be wrong lets see what everyone else thinks?

 

????

 

i'm using a -3an line with no resticter. no problems yet

 

nobody else?

 

i had my drag kit with no restrictor for 4 years, no problems, with my new t3t67, i asked geoff or javier, i cant rememebr, at f-r, and they said the -3 is enough.