Aeromotive 13101 Question
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aeromotive 13101 Question
Hey guys,
i have a an aeromotive 13101 model....well please dont ask me to sell this and get another one since am overseas and have no other choice but to work with this one....well this version has two -8 inlets and one -6 return (well my setup is -8 feed up to the fpr and -6 return to the tank)....since it has two inlets i should be blocking it with a bolt or something right (thats what i assume) or i should route it somewhere else? and should the vacum nipple on the fpr be 1/4" (well am asking cause it came with a 1/8 nipple!)
let me know guys,
Kamal
Modified by IntegraTypeR at 10:18 PM 8/7/2006
i have a an aeromotive 13101 model....well please dont ask me to sell this and get another one since am overseas and have no other choice but to work with this one....well this version has two -8 inlets and one -6 return (well my setup is -8 feed up to the fpr and -6 return to the tank)....since it has two inlets i should be blocking it with a bolt or something right (thats what i assume) or i should route it somewhere else? and should the vacum nipple on the fpr be 1/4" (well am asking cause it came with a 1/8 nipple!)
let me know guys,
Kamal
Modified by IntegraTypeR at 10:18 PM 8/7/2006
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Aeromotive 13101 Question (IntegraTypeR)
vac on mine was a 1/8 off the top of my head.
just cap the other inlet.
If gives you a choice of which you want to use
just cap the other inlet.
If gives you a choice of which you want to use
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Aeromotive 13101 Question (PM-Performance)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by PM-Performance »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I dont know why you are trying to run a different size?</TD></TR></TABLE>
because i use an aftermarket vacum manifold and all the vacum tubes i qm using are 1/4! am not using a stock fpr any more and not even a stock fuel rail....well actually i dont have any 1/8" tubes on my car any more!
because i use an aftermarket vacum manifold and all the vacum tubes i qm using are 1/4! am not using a stock fpr any more and not even a stock fuel rail....well actually i dont have any 1/8" tubes on my car any more!
Trending Topics
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Aeromotive 13101 Question (PM-Performance)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by PM-Performance »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">tooo **** dude, just use the 1 1/8th line and call it a day. </TD></TR></TABLE>
hmm would a 1/8 tube fit on a 1/4 fitting?
i have a fitting already machined a 1/4 fiting for my fpr to fit my 1/4 tube to the 1/4 fitting on the vacum manifold! whats wrong with this way? i dont want to strain/stretch the outer diammemeter of the the tube at the fpr side allot then it would make it leak/crack in the future from the engine bay heat after a few months!
wanna know the reason why you dont think using a 1/4 fitting could be a bad idea? am interested to know though! well if you are telling to use a 1/8 fitting on the vacum mani side then i dont have one and dont know where to get one, so thats why i machined a fitting!
hmm would a 1/8 tube fit on a 1/4 fitting?
i have a fitting already machined a 1/4 fiting for my fpr to fit my 1/4 tube to the 1/4 fitting on the vacum manifold! whats wrong with this way? i dont want to strain/stretch the outer diammemeter of the the tube at the fpr side allot then it would make it leak/crack in the future from the engine bay heat after a few months!
wanna know the reason why you dont think using a 1/4 fitting could be a bad idea? am interested to know though! well if you are telling to use a 1/8 fitting on the vacum mani side then i dont have one and dont know where to get one, so thats why i machined a fitting!
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Aeromotive 13101 Question (IntegraTypeR)
IM saying either way is no difference dude. Its not going to affect anything whatsoever.
IMO, I wouldnt have even went thru the hassle. I would have just stuck a 1/8 line on it and called it a day.
All it is is a vac line.
IMO, I wouldnt have even went thru the hassle. I would have just stuck a 1/8 line on it and called it a day.
All it is is a vac line.
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Aeromotive 13101 Question (PM-Performance)
ok i get your point i dont have to use the vacum off the vacum manifold for the fpr and i could take it frmo another souorce like the intake manifold
thanks for the info man
thanks for the info man
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
s2kkk
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
3
02-24-2004 01:18 PM
hotboi850
Forced Induction
8
08-26-2003 02:46 PM
13101, 6an, aeromotive, fir, fuel, honda, install, installation, installing, kit, lightning, line, pt, sale, supra