Notices

81.5mm gsr or lsvtec

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2006, 09:42 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
IGotVTECyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fredericksburg, Va, USA
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 81.5mm gsr or lsvtec

Basically im trying to find out which is better for turbo a 81.5mm Gsr, or a 81.5mm LSvtec? Im sending off my motor in about a little over a month, an im just going to get the motor bored out to 81.5mm an im not sure if i should just leave it gsr or throw in ls crank. So basically is there like a huge difference between the two as in spool times when your turbo, or power period. I mean i already know a lsvtec will make more torque flat out period an i know a good bit about the swap. But does it make a huge difference compared to a gsr if both were 81.5mm? The turbo that is going to be on the setup is a sc61 by the way if anyone cared to know.
Old 02-03-2006, 05:14 AM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Finland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 81.5mm gsr or lsvtec (IGotVTECyo)

Honda motors were made to spin...go with the GSR crank
Old 02-03-2006, 07:01 AM
  #3  
Member
 
drumking15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: northern, ma, US
Posts: 2,933
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i personally love the added low end torque...and extra displacement never hurts...i love my boosted ls/vtec w/ my hx35 turbo...somewhat very similar to the sc61...mine is bored out to 81.5 also w/ about 6k on it so far...rips like a bat outa hell! only spinning it to 8k tho...keep things under control
Old 02-03-2006, 07:42 AM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
mike1114's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: I drink Seafoam and poo into catch cans, USA
Posts: 3,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: (drumking15)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by drumking15 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i personally love the added low end torque...and extra displacement never hurts...i love my boosted ls/vtec w/ my hx35 turbo...somewhat very similar to the sc61...mine is bored out to 81.5 also w/ about 6k on it so far...rips like a bat outa hell! only spinning it to 8k tho...keep things under control</TD></TR></TABLE>

cept my turbo is a t3/t4 57 trim!!
to the LS crank!!
Old 02-03-2006, 08:46 AM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
 
sloweredcivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: gering, ne, usa
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i guess i don't under stand is this a gsr block you want to put an ls crank into? or are you just useing a ls bottom end instead of a gsr bottom end. what kind of power differences foes this make?
Old 02-03-2006, 09:11 AM
  #6  
Member
 
drumking15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: northern, ma, US
Posts: 2,933
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: (sloweredcivic)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sloweredcivic &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i guess i don't under stand is this a gsr block you want to put an ls crank into? or are you just useing a ls bottom end instead of a gsr bottom end. what kind of power differences foes this make?</TD></TR></TABLE>

you can do either...only benefit is stickin w/ the gsr block you have an oem girdle...w/ the ls you wouldnt

its not power...but more or less low end torque...just compare some ls/vtec to gsrs and youll see the slight increase in torque
Old 02-03-2006, 11:23 AM
  #7  
BCICAN
 
Dunc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: (drumking15)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by drumking15 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

you can do either...only benefit is stickin w/ the gsr block you have an oem girdle...w/ the ls you wouldnt

its not power...but more or less low end torque...just compare some ls/vtec to gsrs and youll see the slight increase in torque</TD></TR></TABLE>

^^^x2 ls/vtec all the way in my mind. Also if you're engine is apart and everything, you could just go with the ERL 5-main girdle which will then far out-shine the GSR OEM girdle.
Old 02-03-2006, 12:09 PM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
mike1114's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: I drink Seafoam and poo into catch cans, USA
Posts: 3,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: (Dunc)

GSR also has internal oil line for vtec, where LS block needs an external oil line to the head.
Old 02-03-2006, 12:41 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
saver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: haha, California, USA
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (mike1114)

ive always wanted to ask this question but i didnt know how to say it. well from wat i have learned is that with the r/s ratio on the full gsr block would be more reliable then the ls/vtec. for me i rather go wit the one thats more reliable and also quick. but then again i would do both so im stuck also.
Old 02-03-2006, 01:20 PM
  #10  
Member
 
boosted92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,411
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: (saver)

The LS crank is barely any longer of a throw than a GSR crank. These huge torque gains you guys are thinking of are 99% in your head, because it really doesn't make that huge of a difference. On a 300 WHP setup you're looking at realisticly about 5 ft-lbs of torque, maybe 10 tops.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by saver &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ive always wanted to ask this question but i didnt know how to say it. well from wat i have learned is that with the r/s ratio on the full gsr block would be more reliable then the ls/vtec. for me i rather go wit the one thats more reliable and also quick. but then again i would do both so im stuck also. </TD></TR></TABLE>

If by "what you have learned" you mean "the banter you've heard on the internet", then yes, the LS has a "worse" rod/stroke ratio at 1.54:1 vs. 1.58:1 for the GSR. You really should learn about how the rod/stroke ratio of a motor impacts it's reliability and longevity. That is a tiny difference, and the R/S ratio of the LS motor is not going to impact how long your motor lasts significantly. Same goes for thinking the added stroke of the LS crank is going to effect how high your motor will rev, both cranks with the proper turbo, cylinder head, and camshafts will make power to 10000+ RPM's, and at that point I'm much more concerned with the terrible inaccuracies of a distributor setup rather than my motor having an extra tenth of an inch of stroke.
Old 02-03-2006, 10:51 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
saver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: haha, California, USA
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (boosted92)

good way of putting it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
s032105k
Acura Integra
40
01-11-2011 08:17 AM
EG_SICKZ
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
4
09-21-2008 07:35 PM
4CDFED
Acura Integra
15
08-17-2006 08:29 AM
G-Phi
Forced Induction
22
10-21-2005 09:22 AM
koucex
Acura Integra
41
01-19-2005 08:28 PM



Quick Reply: 81.5mm gsr or lsvtec



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:40 PM.