300 whp /w JRSC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2001 | 10:56 AM
  #1  
pstreck's Avatar
Thread Starter
New User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: Akron, OH, USA
Default 300 whp /w JRSC

Is it possible to get 300 whp out of the JRSC?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2001 | 10:57 AM
  #2  
pstreck's Avatar
Thread Starter
New User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: Akron, OH, USA
Default Re: 300 whp /w JRSC (pstreck)

ack, on a b18C1
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2001 | 11:27 AM
  #3  
Arturbo's Avatar
Better than steak
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,859
Likes: 0
Default Re: 300 whp /w JRSC (puffy)

Not untill the intercooler is made. If it works, which I hope it does work out for the SC guys. 12psi non intercooled is not good.

art
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2001 | 11:30 AM
  #4  
jinxproof99's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,141
Likes: 0
From: VIRGINIA
Default Re: 300 whp /w JRSC (pstreck)

if your motor was built, you had a 11lb pulley, had they correct fuel management/tuning, and sprayed a 50 shot, you would be close to that figure......but why would you want to? it would be risky and probably not cost effective......especially if your just "trying to be different"
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2001 | 11:51 AM
  #5  
VaporTrail's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Default Re: 300 whp /w JRSC (jinxproof99)

GSR +12psi + intake + quality header + no exhaust/cat + 25shot wet + clutch = 320hp/260tq. Stock everything else. Been there, done that, ran a 11.2@123mph in a Civic on slicks with that.

But, if you want it reliable, I'd highly recommend pistons, rods, and a management system like Hondata.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2001 | 02:31 PM
  #6  
iceman's Avatar
Trial User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Redwood City, CA, USA
Default

That much boost on a M62 would be problematic without an intercooler of some kind (NOS).
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2001 | 09:23 PM
  #7  
DIRep972's Avatar
Smarter than you
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,240
Likes: 2
From: Third Coast, united states
Default Re: (iceman)

i was thinking about it once and if i had a JRSC i would do the ENDYN upgrade for 9lbs of boost, of course the JRSC intercooler when it comes out, header w/ a 2.5" collector, high flow cat, and apex N1 exhaust.. and CAI... that set up could be around 275hp i think if the intercooler works out nice..
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2001 | 10:18 PM
  #8  
SpoonCivic's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
Default Re: (DIRep972)

some dude in toronto is running an ITR with JRSC, built bottom, 100shot, and is running like 350whp
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2001 | 05:47 AM
  #9  
TypeC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS, USA
Default Re: (SpoonCivic)

some dude in toronto is running an ITR with JRSC, built bottom, 100shot, and is running like 350whp
but what happens when you run out of Nitrous (it's not like you spray everytime at WOT)? That's a draw back of pully driven boost. I say DRAG baby, DRAG!
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2001 | 07:08 AM
  #10  
lundgren's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO, USA
Default Re: 300 whp /w JRSC (pstreck)

Your HP may not be that high, but you can generate a huge amount of torque accross a wider range than most turbo kits making 300 whp that's for sure. For a drag race car that wouldn't do, but for the street, a broad range torque band is much more usuable, that a car making only 300 whp, unless of course you drive your car from 7-8k all the time.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2001 | 10:24 AM
  #11  
H23 Power's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Default Re: 300 whp /w JRSC (TypeRgirly)

autocrossing/road racing...torque is god

well, for honda/acura's it is...too much is bad...but if you have good tires, its hard to have too much torque


[Modified by 01GSR, 1:25 PM 8/21/2001]
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2001 | 02:20 PM
  #12  
lundgren's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO, USA
Default Re: 300 whp /w JRSC (TypeRgirly)

I'd rather have 150 ft-lbs of torque at the wheels from 3-7k than 120 from 3-5, and 170 from 5-7k. Even if the later makes more HP, the torque in the previous is better used for a daily driver and autox, and really that large surge is what creates traction problems.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hondaapi
Forced Induction
2
Jul 12, 2006 03:50 AM
jxj220z28
Forced Induction
1
Aug 23, 2005 04:35 PM
2K Teggy
Forced Induction
7
Oct 16, 2003 06:26 PM
siis2fast
Forced Induction
4
Jun 25, 2003 09:22 AM
Dustin98lude
Forced Induction
4
Jun 1, 2003 07:00 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:32 PM.